Skip to content
Keel
Ledger
64,488,694
Methodology
1.0.8-draft
Age
7s

What depth stands behind this price?

RCW against USDC · GCEDS7…6CFYXG

How much can this asset safely back?

The ceiling is the lower of two independent limits. Which one binds is the part a lender acts on, so both are shown.
  1. Low
  2. Medium
  3. High — this asset
  4. Critical

Highpartial confidence

A band marked partial is a floor. At least one high-severity check could not be evaluated, so the real band can only be worse than the one shown, never better.

8.00 USDC (shortened; full value 8.006530157352208054970875907129501235550443956436 USDC)

Limited by liquidation depth

Liquidation termbinds
8.00 USDC (shortened; full value 8.006530157352208054970875907129501235550443956436 USDC)

Sell-side depth at the liquidation delta, times the haircut.

Manipulation term
not applicable

Not applied: the critical target is not reachable through the order book.

These bands come from thresholds that were chosen, not calibrated

The thresholds were chosen based on the magnitude of the Blend incident of February 2026 and on conservative judgement, not calibrated against a set of incidents. Every flag is reported separately so that consumers can apply their own thresholds.

Every threshold, as the engine serves it

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → maxSafeCollateral, maxSafeCollateralLiquidation, maxSafeCollateralManipulation
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What this computation could not do

  • maxReachablePrice and costToMaxReachablePrice are null because an active pool is present: under a constant product curve the price tends to infinity as the base reserve tends to zero, so every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning
  • manipulation to delta 0.5 is unreachable through the order book; the manipulation term was not applied

Served by the engine with this response and shown as written.

Where does the price come from?

Two venues can disagree. Both readings are shown, not only the one that won.
Mid price
2.23573782 USDC (shortened; full value 2.2357378285788313 USDC)

Source: AMM pool spot

Spread
not computed

Undefined unless the price came from a two-sided book

Pool spot price
2.23573782 USDC (shortened; full value 2.2357378285788313 USDC)

Reported whenever an active pool exists, whichever source won

Divergence between the two
not computed

Null means there is no pool to diverge from, not that the sources agree

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → midPrice, priceSource, spreadPct, poolSpotPrice, priceDivergencePct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What volume can it absorb before the price moves?

Three rungs at 2, 5 and 10 per cent, in each direction. The buy side matters for oracle manipulation and the sell side for liquidation.
  • SDEX
  • AMM
  • Sell side, composition not reported

2% from mid

Buy side
3.12 USDC (shortened; full value 3.1237043382339811527380607031 USDC)
Sell side
3.13 USDC (shortened; full value 3.136198510096783898945844401552452236392524893 USDC)

5% from mid

Buy side
7.75 USDC (shortened; full value 7.752390902964355351649520297 USDC)
Sell side
7.90 USDC (shortened; full value 7.901126289428087944059086560542760324396488448158 USDC)

10% from mid

Buy side
15.32 USDC (shortened; full value 15.3222958863126517880803072724 USDC)
Sell side
16.01 USDC (shortened; full value 16.013060314704416109941751814259002471100887912872 USDC)

Bars share one scale. The venue split decomposes the buy side; the sell side is drawn as an outline because its composition is not reported.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → depth[]
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What would it cost to move the price?

Read cost together with reachability: a figure on an unreachable rung says how far the book goes, not what the move costs.
Cost to move the price by each delta, through all venues and through the order book alone, with whether the target is reachable at all.
MoveTarget priceCost, all venuesCost, order book only
0.5%3.353606 USDC (shortened; full value 3.35360674286824695 USDC)70.55 USDC (shortened; full value 70.5529334842838349877304803363 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 0 USDC
1%4.471475 USDC (shortened; full value 4.4714756571576626 USDC)130.03 USDC (shortened; full value 130.0318077713915727711205770894 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 0 USDC
10%24.593116 USDC (shortened; full value 24.5931161143671443 USDC)727.24 USDC (shortened; full value 727.2454037770062094871134977524 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 0 USDC
100%225.809520 USDC (shortened; full value 225.8095206864619613 USDC)2,840.97 USDC (shortened; full value 2840.9781668632077001728734162445 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 0 USDC

Reachability on the all-venues ladder is unconditionally true whenever an active pool exists, because a constant product curve has no upper price bound. The order-book-only column is the one that answers whether a target is attainable, and it is the one Keel itself uses.

How far the book actually goes

Furthest price the book reaches
not computed

Null by structure, not by failure: an active pool means every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning

Cost to walk it that far
not computed

Null for the same reason as the price above

Against genuine volume

Not reported for this asset. Without it there is no comparison between the cost of an attack and the genuine trading it would have to hide inside.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → manipulationCostCombined[], manipulationCostOrderbookOnly[], oracleResistance
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Which checks fired, and which could not run?

An unevaluated check is not a check that came back clear. The two never share a treatment.

Triggered(3)

  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREME
  • THIN_DEPTH_5PCT
  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH

Could not be evaluated(5)

  • PRICE_SOURCE_CONFLICT
  • SPREAD_EXTREME
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_30D
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_7D
  • WASH_TRADE_SUSPECTED
Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → flags[], unevaluatedFlags[], bandConfidence
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Who holds it, and is it genuinely traded?

Concentration and wash trading bound how much of the depth above is real.
Largest holder
96.4270 % (shortened; full value 96.42701591564272466907881962 %)
Top ten holders
99.9893 % (shortened; full value 99.989351426069169195031564 %)
Concentration index
9,300.80 (shortened; full value 9300.8047866062835720533468831205439247042539441594856286)

Herfindahl–Hirschman, over the holder distribution

Volume excluded as not genuine
not computed

Of 30 day volume. A high share indicates suspected wash trading

Volume to supply, 30 day
not computed
Last genuine trade
not computed

No genuine trade was found in the window

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → holderTop1Pct, holderTop10Pct, holderHhi, volumeToSupply, lastGenuineTrade, tradesExcludedPct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

How has this moved over time?

A single reading cannot separate a thin asset from one that just got thin. This is a stored series, not the historical replay that health reports as unavailable — those are different endpoints.

162 readings from horizon, with no gaps reported. One source per chart.

Band at each reading

Medium
18 of 162
High
144 of 162

Which checks were firing

Whether a finding has been there all along or started recently. Only checks that fired at least once appear.

THIN_DEPTH_5PCTthroughout
HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREME144 of 162
HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH144 of 162

Price

Lowest
2.09479608 USDC (shortened; full value 2.094796080038899 USDC)
Highest
2.31800818 USDC (shortened; full value 2.3180081872071475 USDC)
2026-09-11T17:48:12Z2026-09-18T10:45:43Z
Mid price
2.23573782 USDC (shortened; full value 2.2357378285788313 USDC)

Buy-side depth

What an order can absorb before the price moves against a buyer. The rungs are nested, so one scale covers all three, and the lines darken as the rung widens.

Lowest
3.02 USDC (shortened; full value 3.0232342568621843222068637339 USDC)
Highest
15.59 USDC (shortened; full value 15.5960059296760802424596555498 USDC)
2026-09-11T17:48:12Z2026-09-18T10:45:43ZOne scale across every line on this chart
2% from mid
3.12 USDC (shortened; full value 3.1237043382339811527380607031 USDC)
5% from mid
7.75 USDC (shortened; full value 7.752390902964355351649520297 USDC)
10% from mid
15.32 USDC (shortened; full value 15.3222958863126517880803072724 USDC)

Cost to move the price by half

The series carries one manipulation rung, at the half per cent delta the engine treats as critical. A reading the engine could not produce breaks the line rather than sitting at zero.

No point in this range carried a value.

Collateral ceiling

Lowest
7.74 USDC (shortened; full value 7.749010030825218300920172037471798498327554469806 USDC)
Highest
8.14 USDC (shortened; full value 8.149554918968846735605735444384039379012907147432 USDC)
2026-09-11T17:48:12Z2026-09-18T10:45:43Z
Max safe collateral
8.00 USDC (shortened; full value 8.006530157352208054970875907129501235550443956436 USDC)
Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/history → points[], gaps[], dataSource
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What was this computed from?

Ledger
64,488,694

Closed at 2026-09-18T11:00:48Z

Computed at
2026-09-18T11:00:55.054773Z
Data source
horizon
Methodology
1.0.8-draft

The version that produced these figures, not the one this page was built against