What depth stands behind this price?

XRP against USDC · GBXRPL…PRDTD5

How much can this asset safely back?

The ceiling is the lower of two independent limits. Which one binds is the part a lender acts on, so both are shown.

Low
Medium
High
Critical — this asset

Criticalpartial confidence

A band marked partial is a floor. At least one high-severity check could not be evaluated, so the real band can only be worse than the one shown, never better.

346.24 USDC (shortened; full value 346.24663807514970328044363 USDC)

Limited by manipulation cost

Liquidation term: 597.30 USDC (shortened; full value 597.301184132581017072717046431968377222125836209359 USDC)
Sell-side depth at the liquidation delta, times the haircut.
Manipulation termbinds: 346.24 USDC (shortened; full value 346.24663807514970328044363 USDC)
Order-book-only manipulation cost at the critical delta, times the safety margin.

These bands come from thresholds that were chosen, not calibrated

The thresholds were chosen based on the magnitude of the Blend incident of February 2026 and on conservative judgement, not calibrated against a set of incidents. Every flag is reported separately so that consumers can apply their own thresholds.

Every threshold, as the engine serves it

Where this number comes from

Source: GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → maxSafeCollateral, maxSafeCollateralLiquidation, maxSafeCollateralManipulation
What it is: Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for: Awaiting methodology copy.

What this computation could not do

maxReachablePrice and costToMaxReachablePrice are null because an active pool is present: under a constant product curve the price tends to infinity as the base reserve tends to zero, so every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning

Served by the engine with this response and shown as written.

Where does the price come from?

Two venues can disagree. Both readings are shown, not only the one that won.

Mid price: 1.32026772 USDC (shortened; full value 1.32026772179858155 USDC)
Source: order book mid
Spread: 0.1999 % (shortened; full value 0.19999999999998007222356072 %)
Undefined unless the price came from a two-sided book
Pool spot price: 1.32028647 USDC (shortened; full value 1.320286471826897 USDC)
Reported whenever an active pool exists, whichever source won
Divergence between the two: 0.0014 % (shortened; full value 0.0014201484841017381590224 %)
Null means there is no pool to diverge from, not that the sources agree

Where this number comes from

Source: GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → midPrice, priceSource, spreadPct, poolSpotPrice, priceDivergencePct
What it is: Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for: Awaiting methodology copy.

What volume can it absorb before the price moves?

Three rungs at 2, 5 and 10 per cent, in each direction. The buy side matters for oracle manipulation and the sell side for liquidation.

SDEX
AMM
Sell side, composition not reported

2% from mid

Buy side

1,298.45 USDC

Sell side

991.78 USDC

5% from mid

Buy side

1,320.69 USDC

Sell side

999.60 USDC

10% from mid

Buy side

1,345.74 USDC

Sell side

1,194.60 USDC

Bars share one scale. The venue split decomposes the buy side; the sell side is drawn as an outline because its composition is not reported.

Where this number comes from

Source: GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → depth[]
What it is: Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for: Awaiting methodology copy.

What would it cost to move the price?

Read cost together with reachability: a figure on an unreachable rung says how far the book goes, not what the move costs.

Cost to move the price by each delta, through all venues and through the order book alone, with whether the target is reachable at all.
Move	Target price	Cost, all venues	Cost, order book only
0.5%	1.980401 USDC (shortened; full value 1.980401582697872325 USDC)	1,500.79 USDC (shortened; full value 1500.7955188781736141432870099525 USDC)	1,384.98 USDC (shortened; full value 1384.98655230059881312177452 USDC)
1%	2.640535 USDC (shortened; full value 2.6405354435971631 USDC)	2,930.33 USDC (shortened; full value 2930.3339103205939410867877538629 USDC)	2,716.89 USDC (shortened; full value 2716.89038393859881312177452 USDC)
10%	14.522944 USDC (shortened; full value 14.52294493978439705 USDC)	238,107.92 USDC (shortened; full value 238107.9283261790406439260156761195 USDC)	236,914.15 USDC (shortened; full value 236914.15880583549331312177452 USDC)
100%	133.347039 USDC (shortened; full value 133.34703990165673655 USDC)	566,998.88 USDC (shortened; full value 566998.8828376084521832473538185833 USDC)	562,335.42 USDC (shortened; full value 562335.42142511632497312177452 USDC)

Reachability on the all-venues ladder is unconditionally true whenever an active pool exists, because a constant product curve has no upper price bound. The order-book-only column is the one that answers whether a target is attainable, and it is the one Keel itself uses.

How far the book actually goes

Furthest price the book reaches: not computed
Null by structure, not by failure: an active pool means every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning
Cost to walk it that far: not computed
Null for the same reason as the price above

Against genuine volume

Not reported for this asset. Without it there is no comparison between the cost of an attack and the genuine trading it would have to hide inside.

Where this number comes from

Source: GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → manipulationCostCombined[], manipulationCostOrderbookOnly[], oracleResistance
What it is: Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for: Awaiting methodology copy.

Which checks fired, and which could not run?

An unevaluated check is not a check that came back clear. The two never share a treatment.

Triggered(2)

MANIPULATION_CHEAP
THIN_DEPTH_5PCT

Could not be evaluated(6)

MANIPULATION_RATIO_LOW
NO_GENUINE_TRADE_30D
HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREME
NO_GENUINE_TRADE_7D
HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH
WASH_TRADE_SUSPECTED

Where this number comes from

Source: GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → flags[], unevaluatedFlags[], bandConfidence
What it is: Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for: Awaiting methodology copy.

Who holds it, and is it genuinely traded?

Concentration and wash trading bound how much of the depth above is real.

Largest holder: not computed
Top ten holders: not computed
Concentration index: not computed
Herfindahl–Hirschman, over the holder distribution
Volume excluded as not genuine: not computed
Of 30 day volume. A high share indicates suspected wash trading
Volume to supply, 30 day: not computed
Last genuine trade: not computed
No genuine trade was found in the window

Where this number comes from

Source: GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → holderTop1Pct, holderTop10Pct, holderHhi, volumeToSupply, lastGenuineTrade, tradesExcludedPct
What it is: Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for: Awaiting methodology copy.

How has this moved over time?

A single reading cannot separate a thin asset from one that just got thin. This is a stored series, not the historical replay that health reports as unavailable — those are different endpoints.

WindowLast 24 hours Last 7 days Last 30 days

ResolutionHourly Daily

SourceHorizon Hubble Offers implied Trades implied

8 readings from horizon, with no gaps reported. One source per chart.

Band at each reading

Critical: 8 of 8

Which checks were firing

Whether a finding has been there all along or started recently. Only checks that fired at least once appear.

MANIPULATION_CHEAP

throughout

THIN_DEPTH_5PCT

throughout

ZERO_DEPTH_2PCT

1 of 8

Price

Lowest: 1.28407441 USDC (shortened; full value 1.2840744198272894 USDC)
Highest: 1.42135903 USDC (shortened; full value 1.4213590331142693 USDC)

2026-09-11T23:48:33Z — 2026-09-18T12:01:08Z

Mid price: 1.32075641 USDC (shortened; full value 1.3207564144457314 USDC)

Buy-side depth

What an order can absorb before the price moves against a buyer. The rungs are nested, so one scale covers all three, and the lines darken as the rung widens.

Lowest: 10.93 USDC (shortened; full value 10.939681297921291622534237781 USDC)
Highest: 5,488.08 USDC (shortened; full value 5488.0847008882257291924434033201 USDC)

2026-09-11T23:48:33Z — 2026-09-18T12:01:08ZOne scale across every line on this chart

2% from mid: 1,299.43 USDC (shortened; full value 1299.4354435053181089703818108374 USDC)
5% from mid: 1,321.68 USDC (shortened; full value 1321.6806298599131314477788925049 USDC)
10% from mid: 1,346.72 USDC (shortened; full value 1346.7289555916024624477732967595 USDC)

Cost to move the price by half

The series carries one manipulation rung, at the half per cent delta the engine treats as critical. A reading the engine could not produce breaks the line rather than sitting at zero.

Lowest: 91.65 USDC (shortened; full value 91.6571016716296 USDC)
Highest: 6,986.53 USDC (shortened; full value 6986.5337743833619282857791 USDC)

2026-09-11T23:48:33Z — 2026-09-18T12:01:08Z

Manipulation cost, 0.5%: 1,385.87 USDC (shortened; full value 1385.87199378515460576330648 USDC)

Collateral ceiling

Lowest: 22.91 USDC (shortened; full value 22.9142754179074 USDC)
Highest: 585.07 USDC (shortened; full value 585.076728616607359058780397093854400312471984866176 USDC)

2026-09-11T23:48:33Z — 2026-09-18T12:01:08Z

Max safe collateral: 346.46 USDC (shortened; full value 346.46799844628865144082662 USDC)

Where this number comes from

Source: GET /asset/{assetId}/history → points[], gaps[], dataSource
What it is: Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for: Awaiting methodology copy.

What was this computed from?

Ledger: 64,489,598
Closed at 2026-09-18T12:16:08Z
Computed at: 2026-09-18T12:16:16.079582Z
Data source: horizon
Methodology: 1.0.8-draft
The version that produced these figures, not the one this page was built against