What depth stands behind this price?

XLMFISHz against USDC · GBLLGU…75SLGZ

How much can this asset safely back?

The ceiling is the lower of two independent limits. Which one binds is the part a lender acts on, so both are shown.

Low
Medium
High — this asset
Critical

Highpartial confidence

A band marked partial is a floor. At least one high-severity check could not be evaluated, so the real band can only be worse than the one shown, never better.

10.32 USDC (shortened; full value 10.32185660206936499545374425127905357167094995161 USDC)

Limited by liquidation depth

Liquidation termbinds: 10.32 USDC (shortened; full value 10.32185660206936499545374425127905357167094995161 USDC)
Sell-side depth at the liquidation delta, times the haircut.
Manipulation term: not applicable
Not applied: the critical target is not reachable through the order book.

These bands come from thresholds that were chosen, not calibrated

The thresholds were chosen based on the magnitude of the Blend incident of February 2026 and on conservative judgement, not calibrated against a set of incidents. Every flag is reported separately so that consumers can apply their own thresholds.

Every threshold, as the engine serves it

Where this number comes from

Source: GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → maxSafeCollateral, maxSafeCollateralLiquidation, maxSafeCollateralManipulation
What it is: Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for: Awaiting methodology copy.

What this computation could not do

maxReachablePrice and costToMaxReachablePrice are null because an active pool is present: under a constant product curve the price tends to infinity as the base reserve tends to zero, so every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning
manipulation to delta 0.5 is unreachable through the order book; the manipulation term was not applied

Served by the engine with this response and shown as written.

Where does the price come from?

Two venues can disagree. Both readings are shown, not only the one that won.

Mid price: 0.45132264 USDC (shortened; full value 0.4513226411786262 USDC)
Source: AMM pool spot
Spread: not computed
Undefined unless the price came from a two-sided book
Pool spot price: 0.45132264 USDC (shortened; full value 0.4513226411786262 USDC)
Reported whenever an active pool exists, whichever source won
Divergence between the two: not computed
Null means there is no pool to diverge from, not that the sources agree

Where this number comes from

Source: GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → midPrice, priceSource, spreadPct, poolSpotPrice, priceDivergencePct
What it is: Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for: Awaiting methodology copy.

What volume can it absorb before the price moves?

Three rungs at 2, 5 and 10 per cent, in each direction. The buy side matters for oracle manipulation and the sell side for liquidation.

SDEX
AMM
Sell side, composition not reported

2% from mid

Buy side

4.02 USDC

Sell side

4.04 USDC

5% from mid

Buy side

9.99 USDC

Sell side

10.18 USDC

10% from mid

Buy side

21.34 USDC

Sell side

20.64 USDC

Bars share one scale. The venue split decomposes the buy side; the sell side is drawn as an outline because its composition is not reported.

Where this number comes from

Source: GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → depth[]
What it is: Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for: Awaiting methodology copy.

What would it cost to move the price?

Read cost together with reachability: a figure on an unreachable rung says how far the book goes, not what the move costs.

Cost to move the price by each delta, through all venues and through the order book alone, with whether the target is reachable at all.
Move	Target price	Cost, all venues	Cost, order book only
0.5%	0.676983 USDC (shortened; full value 0.6769839617679393 USDC)	1,607.63 USDC (shortened; full value 1607.639939699231931993333842684 USDC)	unreachablebook ends at 1,516.68 USDC (shortened; full value 1516.68452605960519 USDC)
1%	0.902645 USDC (shortened; full value 0.9026452823572524 USDC)	1,684.31 USDC (shortened; full value 1684.3189003948682465703839846831 USDC)	unreachablebook ends at 1,516.68 USDC (shortened; full value 1516.68452605960519 USDC)
10%	4.964549 USDC (shortened; full value 4.9645490529648882 USDC)	2,454.23 USDC (shortened; full value 2454.2345789257933729914980870262 USDC)	unreachablebook ends at 1,516.68 USDC (shortened; full value 1516.68452605960519 USDC)
100%	45.583586 USDC (shortened; full value 45.5835867590412462 USDC)	5,179.21 USDC (shortened; full value 5179.2160686460311662472054644502 USDC)	unreachablebook ends at 1,516.68 USDC (shortened; full value 1516.68452605960519 USDC)

Reachability on the all-venues ladder is unconditionally true whenever an active pool exists, because a constant product curve has no upper price bound. The order-book-only column is the one that answers whether a target is attainable, and it is the one Keel itself uses.

How far the book actually goes

Furthest price the book reaches: not computed
Null by structure, not by failure: an active pool means every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning
Cost to walk it that far: not computed
Null for the same reason as the price above

Against genuine volume

Not reported for this asset. Without it there is no comparison between the cost of an attack and the genuine trading it would have to hide inside.

Where this number comes from

Source: GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → manipulationCostCombined[], manipulationCostOrderbookOnly[], oracleResistance
What it is: Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for: Awaiting methodology copy.

Which checks fired, and which could not run?

An unevaluated check is not a check that came back clear. The two never share a treatment.

Triggered(3)

HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREME
THIN_DEPTH_5PCT
HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH

Could not be evaluated(5)

PRICE_SOURCE_CONFLICT
SPREAD_EXTREME
NO_GENUINE_TRADE_30D
NO_GENUINE_TRADE_7D
WASH_TRADE_SUSPECTED

Where this number comes from

Source: GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → flags[], unevaluatedFlags[], bandConfidence
What it is: Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for: Awaiting methodology copy.

Who holds it, and is it genuinely traded?

Concentration and wash trading bound how much of the depth above is real.

Largest holder: 64.9255 % (shortened; full value 64.9255423520034983622881659 %)
Top ten holders: 99.9685 % (shortened; full value 99.9685392345689926921687946 %)
Concentration index: 5,270.23 (shortened; full value 5270.2386637497653434816082128212380566487513913104613147)
Herfindahl–Hirschman, over the holder distribution
Volume excluded as not genuine: not computed
Of 30 day volume. A high share indicates suspected wash trading
Volume to supply, 30 day: not computed
Last genuine trade: not computed
No genuine trade was found in the window

Where this number comes from

Source: GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → holderTop1Pct, holderTop10Pct, holderHhi, volumeToSupply, lastGenuineTrade, tradesExcludedPct
What it is: Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for: Awaiting methodology copy.

How has this moved over time?

A single reading cannot separate a thin asset from one that just got thin. This is a stored series, not the historical replay that health reports as unavailable — those are different endpoints.

WindowLast 24 hours Last 7 days Last 30 days

ResolutionHourly Daily

SourceHorizon Hubble Offers implied Trades implied

164 readings from horizon, with no gaps reported. One source per chart.

Band at each reading

Medium: 18 of 164
High: 102 of 164
Critical: 44 of 164

Which checks were firing

Whether a finding has been there all along or started recently. Only checks that fired at least once appear.

THIN_DEPTH_5PCT

throughout

HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREME

146 of 164

HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH

146 of 164

ZERO_DEPTH_2PCT

44 of 164

Price

Lowest: 0.42557148 USDC (shortened; full value 0.4255714891117751 USDC)
Highest: 0.46208455 USDC

2026-09-11T17:48:29Z — 2026-09-18T12:01:08Z

Mid price: 0.45132264 USDC (shortened; full value 0.4513226411786262 USDC)

Buy-side depth

What an order can absorb before the price moves against a buyer. The rungs are nested, so one scale covers all three, and the lines darken as the rung widens.

Lowest: 3.90 USDC (shortened; full value 3.9094894959484664627944720738 USDC)
Highest: 35.39 USDC (shortened; full value 35.3940021673658218360202214582 USDC)

2026-09-11T17:48:29Z — 2026-09-18T12:01:08ZOne scale across every line on this chart

2% from mid: 4.02 USDC (shortened; full value 4.0270163994705837346613780344 USDC)
5% from mid: 9.99 USDC (shortened; full value 9.994225419872489030926362688 USDC)
10% from mid: 21.34 USDC (shortened; full value 21.3433233792352510650986465767 USDC)

Cost to move the price by half

The series carries one manipulation rung, at the half per cent delta the engine treats as critical. A reading the engine could not produce breaks the line rather than sitting at zero.

No point in this range carried a value.

Collateral ceiling

Lowest: 3.70 USDC (shortened; full value 3.7063414784310454005874844765693765225553831729 USDC)
Highest: 10.33 USDC (shortened; full value 10.339044035295947613519760912636780333504740000732 USDC)

2026-09-11T17:48:29Z — 2026-09-18T12:01:08Z

Max safe collateral: 10.32 USDC (shortened; full value 10.32185660206936499545374425127905357167094995161 USDC)

Where this number comes from

Source: GET /asset/{assetId}/history → points[], gaps[], dataSource
What it is: Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for: Awaiting methodology copy.

What was this computed from?

Ledger: 64,489,598
Closed at 2026-09-18T12:16:08Z
Computed at: 2026-09-18T12:16:15.315932Z
Data source: horizon
Methodology: 1.0.8-draft
The version that produced these figures, not the one this page was built against