What depth stands behind this price?

XLM against USDC · native

How much can this asset safely back?

The ceiling is the lower of two independent limits. Which one binds is the part a lender acts on, so both are shown.

Low — this asset
Medium
High
Critical

Lowpartial confidence

A band marked partial is a floor. At least one high-severity check could not be evaluated, so the real band can only be worse than the one shown, never better.

186,713.39 USDC (shortened; full value 186713.394607924968696355742662452128099170599951736875 USDC)

Limited by liquidation depth

Liquidation termbinds: 186,713.39 USDC (shortened; full value 186713.394607924968696355742662452128099170599951736875 USDC)
Sell-side depth at the liquidation delta, times the haircut.
Manipulation term: not applicable
Not applied: the critical target is not reachable through the order book.

These bands come from thresholds that were chosen, not calibrated

The thresholds were chosen based on the magnitude of the Blend incident of February 2026 and on conservative judgement, not calibrated against a set of incidents. Every flag is reported separately so that consumers can apply their own thresholds.

Every threshold, as the engine serves it

Where this number comes from

Source: GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → maxSafeCollateral, maxSafeCollateralLiquidation, maxSafeCollateralManipulation
What it is: Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for: Awaiting methodology copy.

What this computation could not do

maxReachablePrice and costToMaxReachablePrice are null because an active pool is present: under a constant product curve the price tends to infinity as the base reserve tends to zero, so every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning
manipulation to delta 0.5 is unreachable through the order book; the manipulation term was not applied

Served by the engine with this response and shown as written.

Where does the price come from?

Two venues can disagree. Both readings are shown, not only the one that won.

Mid price: 0.18566001 USDC (shortened; full value 0.1856600138560693 USDC)
Source: order book mid
Spread: 0.1266 % (shortened; full value 0.12666824857813190558966849 %)
Undefined unless the price came from a two-sided book
Pool spot price: 0.18559147 USDC (shortened; full value 0.185591478314826 USDC)
Reported whenever an active pool exists, whichever source won
Divergence between the two: 0.0369 % (shortened; full value 0.03692817249240318656714763 %)
Null means there is no pool to diverge from, not that the sources agree

Where this number comes from

Source: GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → midPrice, priceSource, spreadPct, poolSpotPrice, priceDivergencePct
What it is: Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for: Awaiting methodology copy.

What volume can it absorb before the price moves?

Three rungs at 2, 5 and 10 per cent, in each direction. The buy side matters for oracle manipulation and the sell side for liquidation.

SDEX
AMM
Sell side, composition not reported

2% from mid

Buy side

91,965.95 USDC

Sell side

80,543.48 USDC

5% from mid

Buy side

440,436.33 USDC

Sell side

123,607.77 USDC

10% from mid

Buy side

539,158.27 USDC

Sell side

373,426.78 USDC

Bars share one scale. The venue split decomposes the buy side; the sell side is drawn as an outline because its composition is not reported.

Where this number comes from

Source: GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → depth[]
What it is: Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for: Awaiting methodology copy.

What would it cost to move the price?

Read cost together with reachability: a figure on an unreachable rung says how far the book goes, not what the move costs.

Cost to move the price by each delta, through all venues and through the order book alone, with whether the target is reachable at all.
Move	Target price	Cost, all venues	Cost, order book only
0.5%	0.278490 USDC (shortened; full value 0.27849002078410395 USDC)	1,082,007.54 USDC (shortened; full value 1082007.5454709584986171736912219019 USDC)	unreachablebook ends at 503,526.71 USDC (shortened; full value 503526.71701725339775119956313 USDC)
1%	0.371320 USDC (shortened; full value 0.3713200277121386 USDC)	1,569,289.22 USDC (shortened; full value 1569289.2237967093019384855589671974 USDC)	unreachablebook ends at 503,526.71 USDC (shortened; full value 503526.71701725339775119956313 USDC)
10%	2.042260 USDC (shortened; full value 2.0422601524167623 USDC)	6,461,971.65 USDC (shortened; full value 6461971.6571569276059867980451619835 USDC)	unreachablebook ends at 503,526.71 USDC (shortened; full value 503526.71701725339775119956313 USDC)
100%	18.751661 USDC (shortened; full value 18.7516613994629993 USDC)	23,778,762.88 USDC (shortened; full value 23778762.8821721508653911957463041086 USDC)	unreachablebook ends at 503,526.71 USDC (shortened; full value 503526.71701725339775119956313 USDC)

Reachability on the all-venues ladder is unconditionally true whenever an active pool exists, because a constant product curve has no upper price bound. The order-book-only column is the one that answers whether a target is attainable, and it is the one Keel itself uses.

How far the book actually goes

Furthest price the book reaches: not computed
Null by structure, not by failure: an active pool means every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning
Cost to walk it that far: not computed
Null for the same reason as the price above

Against genuine volume

Not reported for this asset. Without it there is no comparison between the cost of an attack and the genuine trading it would have to hide inside.

Where this number comes from

Source: GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → manipulationCostCombined[], manipulationCostOrderbookOnly[], oracleResistance
What it is: Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for: Awaiting methodology copy.

Which checks fired, and which could not run?

An unevaluated check is not a check that came back clear. The two never share a treatment.

Triggered(0)

Nothing triggered.

Could not be evaluated(6)

MANIPULATION_RATIO_LOW
NO_GENUINE_TRADE_30D
HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREME
NO_GENUINE_TRADE_7D
HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH
WASH_TRADE_SUSPECTED

Nothing triggered, but 6 checks could not run. This is not a clean result.

Where this number comes from

Source: GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → flags[], unevaluatedFlags[], bandConfidence
What it is: Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for: Awaiting methodology copy.

Who holds it, and is it genuinely traded?

Concentration and wash trading bound how much of the depth above is real.

Largest holder: not computed
Top ten holders: not computed
Concentration index: not computed
Herfindahl–Hirschman, over the holder distribution
Volume excluded as not genuine: not computed
Of 30 day volume. A high share indicates suspected wash trading
Volume to supply, 30 day: not computed
Last genuine trade: not computed
No genuine trade was found in the window

Where this number comes from

Source: GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → holderTop1Pct, holderTop10Pct, holderHhi, volumeToSupply, lastGenuineTrade, tradesExcludedPct
What it is: Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for: Awaiting methodology copy.

How has this moved over time?

A single reading cannot separate a thin asset from one that just got thin. This is a stored series, not the historical replay that health reports as unavailable — those are different endpoints.

WindowLast 24 hours Last 7 days Last 30 days

ResolutionHourly Daily

SourceHorizon Hubble Offers implied Trades implied

8 readings from horizon, with no gaps reported. One source per chart.

Band at each reading

Low: 8 of 8

Which checks were firing

Whether a finding has been there all along or started recently. Only checks that fired at least once appear.

No check fired at any reading in this window. That is not the same as every check having run: a history point lists what fired, not what could not be evaluated.

Price

Lowest: 0.1760221 USDC
Highest: 0.19114994 USDC

2026-09-11T23:48:28Z — 2026-09-18T11:31:08Z

Mid price: 0.18497712 USDC (shortened; full value 0.1849771203101894 USDC)

Buy-side depth

What an order can absorb before the price moves against a buyer. The rungs are nested, so one scale covers all three, and the lines darken as the rung widens.

Lowest: 68,580.79 USDC (shortened; full value 68580.7966540890581885650252588511 USDC)
Highest: 811,066.47 USDC (shortened; full value 811066.4714908293088406189353216481 USDC)

2026-09-11T23:48:28Z — 2026-09-18T11:31:08ZOne scale across every line on this chart

2% from mid: 77,097.28 USDC (shortened; full value 77097.2834083593579959473255178627 USDC)
5% from mid: 424,241.00 USDC (shortened; full value 424241.0047031666765216865637926057 USDC)
10% from mid: 524,205.89 USDC (shortened; full value 524205.8981367445133289943079256321 USDC)

Cost to move the price by half

The series carries one manipulation rung, at the half per cent delta the engine treats as critical. A reading the engine could not produce breaks the line rather than sitting at zero.

No point in this range carried a value.

Collateral ceiling

Lowest: 150,951.93 USDC (shortened; full value 150951.931075299806985706489634943857945673763398828215 USDC)
Highest: 289,305.00 USDC (shortened; full value 289305.008105608015261518686290651421818353754441790918 USDC)

2026-09-11T23:48:28Z — 2026-09-18T11:31:08Z

Max safe collateral: 190,992.53 USDC (shortened; full value 190992.53861103412317921278259319408722937267819274853 USDC)

Where this number comes from

Source: GET /asset/{assetId}/history → points[], gaps[], dataSource
What it is: Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for: Awaiting methodology copy.

What was this computed from?

Ledger: 64,489,238
Closed at 2026-09-18T11:46:08Z
Computed at: 2026-09-18T11:46:14.148269Z
Data source: horizon
Methodology: 1.0.8-draft
The version that produced these figures, not the one this page was built against