Skip to content
Keel
Ledger
64,489,597
Methodology
1.0.8-draft
Age
9s

What depth stands behind this price?

XAG against USDC · GB4I3O…YCLXAG

How much can this asset safely back?

The ceiling is the lower of two independent limits. Which one binds is the part a lender acts on, so both are shown.
  1. Low
  2. Medium
  3. High
  4. Critical — this asset

Criticalpartial confidence

A band marked partial is a floor. At least one high-severity check could not be evaluated, so the real band can only be worse than the one shown, never better.

0 USDC

Limited by manipulation cost

Liquidation term
18.49 USDC (shortened; full value 18.49050086956466511835823418161577382737667242639 USDC)

Sell-side depth at the liquidation delta, times the haircut.

Manipulation termbinds
0 USDC

Order-book-only manipulation cost at the critical delta, times the safety margin.

These bands come from thresholds that were chosen, not calibrated

The thresholds were chosen based on the magnitude of the Blend incident of February 2026 and on conservative judgement, not calibrated against a set of incidents. Every flag is reported separately so that consumers can apply their own thresholds.

Every threshold, as the engine serves it

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → maxSafeCollateral, maxSafeCollateralLiquidation, maxSafeCollateralManipulation
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What this computation could not do

  • maxReachablePrice and costToMaxReachablePrice are null because an active pool is present: under a constant product curve the price tends to infinity as the base reserve tends to zero, so every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning

Served by the engine with this response and shown as written.

Where does the price come from?

Two venues can disagree. Both readings are shown, not only the one that won.
Mid price
0.00014517 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0001451760898124 USDC)

Source: AMM pool spot

Spread
68,881,762.9192 % (shortened; full value 68881762.9192397916464714328156795 %)

Undefined unless the price came from a two-sided book

Pool spot price
0.00014517 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0001451760898124 USDC)

Reported whenever an active pool exists, whichever source won

Divergence between the two
34,440,884.7824 % (shortened; full value 34440884.78241925888196777421307568 %)

PRICE_SOURCE_CONFLICT is triggered: the two sources disagree past the threshold and the pool was taken

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → midPrice, priceSource, spreadPct, poolSpotPrice, priceDivergencePct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What volume can it absorb before the price moves?

Three rungs at 2, 5 and 10 per cent, in each direction. The buy side matters for oracle manipulation and the sell side for liquidation.
  • SDEX
  • AMM
  • Sell side, composition not reported

2% from mid

Buy side
7.21 USDC (shortened; full value 7.2139686594641162890982630394 USDC)
Sell side
7.24 USDC (shortened; full value 7.2428231433893167110998078615987890331583542575 USDC)

5% from mid

Buy side
17.90 USDC (shortened; full value 17.9035846399975384694207416302 USDC)
Sell side
18.24 USDC (shortened; full value 18.247078329761948256960302073229030739197650362545 USDC)

10% from mid

Buy side
35.38 USDC (shortened; full value 35.385731281273339892496914617 USDC)
Sell side
36.98 USDC (shortened; full value 36.98100173912933023671646836323154765475334485278 USDC)

Bars share one scale. The venue split decomposes the buy side; the sell side is drawn as an outline because its composition is not reported.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → depth[]
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What would it cost to move the price?

Read cost together with reachability: a figure on an unreachable rung says how far the book goes, not what the move costs.
Cost to move the price by each delta, through all venues and through the order book alone, with whether the target is reachable at all.
MoveTarget priceCost, all venuesCost, order book only
0.5%0.000217 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0002177641347186 USDC)162.93 USDC (shortened; full value 162.9368838654652021759777258404 USDC)free to reach
1%0.000290 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0002903521796248 USDC)300.29 USDC (shortened; full value 300.2990310301310627525292486406 USDC)free to reach
10%0.001596 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0015969369879364 USDC)1,679.52 USDC (shortened; full value 1679.5205251572286639471497391232 USDC)free to reach
100%0.014662 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0146627850710524 USDC)6,561.03 USDC (shortened; full value 6561.0330680527546307914359916154 USDC)free to reach

Reachability on the all-venues ladder is unconditionally true whenever an active pool exists, because a constant product curve has no upper price bound. The order-book-only column is the one that answers whether a target is attainable, and it is the one Keel itself uses.

How far the book actually goes

Furthest price the book reaches
not computed

Null by structure, not by failure: an active pool means every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning

Cost to walk it that far
not computed

Null for the same reason as the price above

Against genuine volume

Not reported for this asset. Without it there is no comparison between the cost of an attack and the genuine trading it would have to hide inside.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → manipulationCostCombined[], manipulationCostOrderbookOnly[], oracleResistance
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Which checks fired, and which could not run?

An unevaluated check is not a check that came back clear. The two never share a treatment.

Triggered(7)

  • MANIPULATION_CHEAP
  • MANIPULATION_RATIO_LOW
  • PRICE_SOURCE_CONFLICT
  • SPREAD_EXTREME
  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREME
  • THIN_DEPTH_5PCT
  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH

Could not be evaluated(3)

  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_30D
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_7D
  • WASH_TRADE_SUSPECTED
Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → flags[], unevaluatedFlags[], bandConfidence
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Who holds it, and is it genuinely traded?

Concentration and wash trading bound how much of the depth above is real.
Largest holder
89.0741 % (shortened; full value 89.07413303082708356530243253 %)
Top ten holders
98.5935 % (shortened; full value 98.59350391178447912611475057 %)
Concentration index
7,981.70 (shortened; full value 7981.7021001826631229899811217928966564672062866967130639)

Herfindahl–Hirschman, over the holder distribution

Volume excluded as not genuine
not computed

Of 30 day volume. A high share indicates suspected wash trading

Volume to supply, 30 day
not computed
Last genuine trade
not computed

No genuine trade was found in the window

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → holderTop1Pct, holderTop10Pct, holderHhi, volumeToSupply, lastGenuineTrade, tradesExcludedPct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

How has this moved over time?

A single reading cannot separate a thin asset from one that just got thin. This is a stored series, not the historical replay that health reports as unavailable — those are different endpoints.

No readings were stored in this range from this source

The engine accepted the request and returned nothing for Offers implied. The series is as old as the deployment, and the reconstruction sources are not populated in production, so a window can reach back further than anything that was recorded. It is not empty because the figures were zero.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/history → points[], gaps[], dataSource
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What was this computed from?

Ledger
64,489,597

Closed at 2026-09-18T12:16:03Z

Computed at
2026-09-18T12:16:12.210401Z
Data source
horizon
Methodology
1.0.8-draft

The version that produced these figures, not the one this page was built against