What depth stands behind this price?
X against USDC · GB3JS5…JP4LEA
How much can this asset safely back?
- Low
- Medium
- High
- Critical — this asset
Criticalpartial confidence
A band marked partial is a floor. At least one high-severity check could not be evaluated, so the real band can only be worse than the one shown, never better.
0 USDC
Limited by manipulation cost
- Liquidation term
- 9.15 USDC (shortened; full value 9.1503133766468926259652772322794653192214201812 USDC)
Sell-side depth at the liquidation delta, times the haircut.
- Manipulation termbinds
- 0 USDC
Order-book-only manipulation cost at the critical delta, times the safety margin.
These bands come from thresholds that were chosen, not calibrated
The thresholds were chosen based on the magnitude of the Blend incident of February 2026 and on conservative judgement, not calibrated against a set of incidents. Every flag is reported separately so that consumers can apply their own thresholds.
Where this number comes from
- Source
- GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → maxSafeCollateral, maxSafeCollateralLiquidation, maxSafeCollateralManipulation
- What it is
- Awaiting methodology copy.
- What it does not account for
- Awaiting methodology copy.
What this computation could not do
- maxReachablePrice and costToMaxReachablePrice are null because an active pool is present: under a constant product curve the price tends to infinity as the base reserve tends to zero, so every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning
Served by the engine with this response and shown as written.
Where does the price come from?
- Mid price
- 0.00482489 USDC (shortened; full value 0.004824894662724 USDC)
Source: AMM pool spot
- Spread
- not computed
Undefined unless the price came from a two-sided book
- Pool spot price
- 0.00482489 USDC (shortened; full value 0.004824894662724 USDC)
Reported whenever an active pool exists, whichever source won
- Divergence between the two
- not computed
Null means there is no pool to diverge from, not that the sources agree
Where this number comes from
- Source
- GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → midPrice, priceSource, spreadPct, poolSpotPrice, priceDivergencePct
- What it is
- Awaiting methodology copy.
- What it does not account for
- Awaiting methodology copy.
What volume can it absorb before the price moves?
- SDEX
- AMM
- Sell side, composition not reported
2% from mid
5% from mid
10% from mid
Bars share one scale. The venue split decomposes the buy side; the sell side is drawn as an outline because its composition is not reported.
Where this number comes from
- Source
- GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → depth[]
- What it is
- Awaiting methodology copy.
- What it does not account for
- Awaiting methodology copy.
What would it cost to move the price?
| Move | Target price | Cost, all venues | Cost, order book only |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5% | 0.007237 USDC (shortened; full value 0.007237341994086 USDC) | 80.63 USDC (shortened; full value 80.631864032898020530156828934 USDC) | free to reach |
| 1% | 0.009649 USDC (shortened; full value 0.009649789325448 USDC) | 148.60 USDC (shortened; full value 148.6076698215577404597671405132 USDC) | free to reach |
| 10% | 0.053073 USDC (shortened; full value 0.053073841289964 USDC) | 847.84 USDC (shortened; full value 847.8449181731319101958530084131 USDC) | unreachablebook ends at 16.70 USDC (shortened; full value 16.7079318002 USDC) |
| 100% | 0.487314 USDC (shortened; full value 0.487314360935124 USDC) | 3,263.53 USDC (shortened; full value 3263.5377085092540676213657154009 USDC) | unreachablebook ends at 16.70 USDC (shortened; full value 16.7079318002 USDC) |
Reachability on the all-venues ladder is unconditionally true whenever an active pool exists, because a constant product curve has no upper price bound. The order-book-only column is the one that answers whether a target is attainable, and it is the one Keel itself uses.
How far the book actually goes
- Furthest price the book reaches
- not computed
Null by structure, not by failure: an active pool means every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning
- Cost to walk it that far
- not computed
Null for the same reason as the price above
Against genuine volume
Not reported for this asset. Without it there is no comparison between the cost of an attack and the genuine trading it would have to hide inside.
Where this number comes from
- Source
- GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → manipulationCostCombined[], manipulationCostOrderbookOnly[], oracleResistance
- What it is
- Awaiting methodology copy.
- What it does not account for
- Awaiting methodology copy.
Which checks fired, and which could not run?
Triggered(5)
- MANIPULATION_CHEAP
- MANIPULATION_RATIO_LOW
- HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREME
- THIN_DEPTH_5PCT
- HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH
Could not be evaluated(5)
- PRICE_SOURCE_CONFLICT
- SPREAD_EXTREME
- NO_GENUINE_TRADE_30D
- NO_GENUINE_TRADE_7D
- WASH_TRADE_SUSPECTED
Where this number comes from
- Source
- GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → flags[], unevaluatedFlags[], bandConfidence
- What it is
- Awaiting methodology copy.
- What it does not account for
- Awaiting methodology copy.
Who holds it, and is it genuinely traded?
- Largest holder
- 99.9581 % (shortened; full value 99.95816873114532202705276864 %)
- Top ten holders
- 99.9999 % (shortened; full value 99.99999915243246215047256737 %)
- Concentration index
- 9,991.63 (shortened; full value 9991.6371087471110268811060287461973876848566186253838371)
Herfindahl–Hirschman, over the holder distribution
- Volume excluded as not genuine
- not computed
Of 30 day volume. A high share indicates suspected wash trading
- Volume to supply, 30 day
- not computed
- Last genuine trade
- not computed
No genuine trade was found in the window
Where this number comes from
- Source
- GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → holderTop1Pct, holderTop10Pct, holderHhi, volumeToSupply, lastGenuineTrade, tradesExcludedPct
- What it is
- Awaiting methodology copy.
- What it does not account for
- Awaiting methodology copy.
How has this moved over time?
162 readings from horizon, with no gaps reported. One source per chart.
Band at each reading
- Critical
- 162 of 162
Which checks were firing
Whether a finding has been there all along or started recently. Only checks that fired at least once appear.
MANIPULATION_CHEAPTHIN_DEPTH_5PCTMANIPULATION_RATIO_LOWHOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREMEHOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGHPrice
- Lowest
- 0.00458861 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0045886108333799 USDC)
- Highest
- 0.00501570 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0050157035941664 USDC)
- Mid price
- 0.00482494 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0048249430566332 USDC)
Buy-side depth
What an order can absorb before the price moves against a buyer. The rungs are nested, so one scale covers all three, and the lines darken as the rung widens.
- Lowest
- 3.48 USDC (shortened; full value 3.4811694018995149887414643273 USDC)
- Highest
- 17.84 USDC (shortened; full value 17.8493836103291646839626869877 USDC)
- 2% from mid
- 3.56 USDC (shortened; full value 3.5699630368564949723860957805 USDC)
- 5% from mid
- 8.85 USDC (shortened; full value 8.859913094877624933598865812 USDC)
- 10% from mid
- 17.51 USDC (shortened; full value 17.5112699638019286454591440409 USDC)
Cost to move the price by half
The series carries one manipulation rung, at the half per cent delta the engine treats as critical. A reading the engine could not produce breaks the line rather than sitting at zero.
- Lowest
- 0 USDC
- Highest
- 0 USDC
- Manipulation cost, 0.5%
- 0 USDC
Collateral ceiling
- Lowest
- 0 USDC
- Highest
- 0 USDC
- Max safe collateral
- 0 USDC
Where this number comes from
- Source
- GET /asset/{assetId}/history → points[], gaps[], dataSource
- What it is
- Awaiting methodology copy.
- What it does not account for
- Awaiting methodology copy.
What was this computed from?
- Ledger
- 64,488,696
Closed at 2026-09-18T11:00:58Z
- Computed at
- 2026-09-18T11:01:10.029867Z
- Data source
- horizon
- Methodology
- 1.0.8-draft
The version that produced these figures, not the one this page was built against