What depth stands behind this price?
X against USDC · GB3JS5…JP4LEA
How much can this asset safely back?
- Low
- Medium
- High
- Critical — this asset
Criticalpartial confidence
A band marked partial is a floor. At least one high-severity check could not be evaluated, so the real band can only be worse than the one shown, never better.
0 USDC
Limited by manipulation cost
- Liquidation term
- 9.13 USDC (shortened; full value 9.132340815179343096204933647242580586976640815626 USDC)
Sell-side depth at the liquidation delta, times the haircut.
- Manipulation termbinds
- 0 USDC
Order-book-only manipulation cost at the critical delta, times the safety margin.
These bands come from thresholds that were chosen, not calibrated
The thresholds were chosen based on the magnitude of the Blend incident of February 2026 and on conservative judgement, not calibrated against a set of incidents. Every flag is reported separately so that consumers can apply their own thresholds.
Where this number comes from
- Source
- GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → maxSafeCollateral, maxSafeCollateralLiquidation, maxSafeCollateralManipulation
- What it is
- Awaiting methodology copy.
- What it does not account for
- Awaiting methodology copy.
What this computation could not do
- maxReachablePrice and costToMaxReachablePrice are null because an active pool is present: under a constant product curve the price tends to infinity as the base reserve tends to zero, so every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning
Served by the engine with this response and shown as written.
Where does the price come from?
- Mid price
- 0.00480593 USDC (shortened; full value 0.004805931256726 USDC)
Source: AMM pool spot
- Spread
- not computed
Undefined unless the price came from a two-sided book
- Pool spot price
- 0.00480593 USDC (shortened; full value 0.004805931256726 USDC)
Reported whenever an active pool exists, whichever source won
- Divergence between the two
- not computed
Null means there is no pool to diverge from, not that the sources agree
Where this number comes from
- Source
- GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → midPrice, priceSource, spreadPct, poolSpotPrice, priceDivergencePct
- What it is
- Awaiting methodology copy.
- What it does not account for
- Awaiting methodology copy.
What volume can it absorb before the price moves?
- SDEX
- AMM
- Sell side, composition not reported
2% from mid
5% from mid
10% from mid
Bars share one scale. The venue split decomposes the buy side; the sell side is drawn as an outline because its composition is not reported.
Where this number comes from
- Source
- GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → depth[]
- What it is
- Awaiting methodology copy.
- What it does not account for
- Awaiting methodology copy.
What would it cost to move the price?
| Move | Target price | Cost, all venues | Cost, order book only |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5% | 0.007208 USDC (shortened; full value 0.007208896885089 USDC) | 80.47 USDC (shortened; full value 80.4734911911248793203597847275 USDC) | free to reach |
| 1% | 0.009611 USDC (shortened; full value 0.009611862513452 USDC) | 148.31 USDC (shortened; full value 148.3157824980881718922698242871 USDC) | free to reach |
| 10% | 0.052865 USDC (shortened; full value 0.052865243823986 USDC) | 846.21 USDC (shortened; full value 846.2124428730329249940340130894 USDC) | unreachablebook ends at 16.70 USDC (shortened; full value 16.7079318002 USDC) |
| 100% | 0.485399 USDC (shortened; full value 0.485399056929326 USDC) | 3,257.16 USDC (shortened; full value 3257.1604572245601222973201700649 USDC) | unreachablebook ends at 16.70 USDC (shortened; full value 16.7079318002 USDC) |
Reachability on the all-venues ladder is unconditionally true whenever an active pool exists, because a constant product curve has no upper price bound. The order-book-only column is the one that answers whether a target is attainable, and it is the one Keel itself uses.
How far the book actually goes
- Furthest price the book reaches
- not computed
Null by structure, not by failure: an active pool means every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning
- Cost to walk it that far
- not computed
Null for the same reason as the price above
Against genuine volume
Not reported for this asset. Without it there is no comparison between the cost of an attack and the genuine trading it would have to hide inside.
Where this number comes from
- Source
- GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → manipulationCostCombined[], manipulationCostOrderbookOnly[], oracleResistance
- What it is
- Awaiting methodology copy.
- What it does not account for
- Awaiting methodology copy.
Which checks fired, and which could not run?
Triggered(5)
- MANIPULATION_CHEAP
- MANIPULATION_RATIO_LOW
- HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREME
- THIN_DEPTH_5PCT
- HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH
Could not be evaluated(5)
- PRICE_SOURCE_CONFLICT
- SPREAD_EXTREME
- NO_GENUINE_TRADE_30D
- NO_GENUINE_TRADE_7D
- WASH_TRADE_SUSPECTED
Where this number comes from
- Source
- GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → flags[], unevaluatedFlags[], bandConfidence
- What it is
- Awaiting methodology copy.
- What it does not account for
- Awaiting methodology copy.
Who holds it, and is it genuinely traded?
- Largest holder
- 99.9581 % (shortened; full value 99.95816873114532202705276864 %)
- Top ten holders
- 99.9999 % (shortened; full value 99.99999915243246215047256737 %)
- Concentration index
- 9,991.63 (shortened; full value 9991.6371087471110268811060287461973876848566186253838371)
Herfindahl–Hirschman, over the holder distribution
- Volume excluded as not genuine
- not computed
Of 30 day volume. A high share indicates suspected wash trading
- Volume to supply, 30 day
- not computed
- Last genuine trade
- not computed
No genuine trade was found in the window
Where this number comes from
- Source
- GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → holderTop1Pct, holderTop10Pct, holderHhi, volumeToSupply, lastGenuineTrade, tradesExcludedPct
- What it is
- Awaiting methodology copy.
- What it does not account for
- Awaiting methodology copy.
How has this moved over time?
163 readings from horizon, with no gaps reported. One source per chart.
Band at each reading
- Critical
- 163 of 163
Which checks were firing
Whether a finding has been there all along or started recently. Only checks that fired at least once appear.
MANIPULATION_CHEAPTHIN_DEPTH_5PCTMANIPULATION_RATIO_LOWHOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREMEHOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGHPrice
- Lowest
- 0.00458861 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0045886108333799 USDC)
- Highest
- 0.00501570 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0050157035941664 USDC)
- Mid price
- 0.00480593 USDC (shortened; full value 0.004805931256726 USDC)
Buy-side depth
What an order can absorb before the price moves against a buyer. The rungs are nested, so one scale covers all three, and the lines darken as the rung widens.
- Lowest
- 3.48 USDC (shortened; full value 3.4811694018995149887414643273 USDC)
- Highest
- 17.84 USDC (shortened; full value 17.8493836103291646839626869877 USDC)
- 2% from mid
- 3.56 USDC (shortened; full value 3.5629332634701362199615773219 USDC)
- 5% from mid
- 8.84 USDC (shortened; full value 8.8424666449741365381070896848 USDC)
- 10% from mid
- 17.47 USDC (shortened; full value 17.4767877413581710116158300628 USDC)
Cost to move the price by half
The series carries one manipulation rung, at the half per cent delta the engine treats as critical. A reading the engine could not produce breaks the line rather than sitting at zero.
- Lowest
- 0 USDC
- Highest
- 0 USDC
- Manipulation cost, 0.5%
- 0 USDC
Collateral ceiling
- Lowest
- 0 USDC
- Highest
- 0 USDC
- Max safe collateral
- 0 USDC
Where this number comes from
- Source
- GET /asset/{assetId}/history → points[], gaps[], dataSource
- What it is
- Awaiting methodology copy.
- What it does not account for
- Awaiting methodology copy.
What was this computed from?
- Ledger
- 64,489,417
Closed at 2026-09-18T12:01:03Z
- Computed at
- 2026-09-18T12:01:10.339272Z
- Data source
- horizon
- Methodology
- 1.0.8-draft
The version that produced these figures, not the one this page was built against