Skip to content
Keel
Ledger
64,488,696
Methodology
1.0.8-draft
Age
6s

What depth stands behind this price?

USDGLO against USDC · GBBS25…HWS6XV

How much can this asset safely back?

The ceiling is the lower of two independent limits. Which one binds is the part a lender acts on, so both are shown.
  1. Low
  2. Medium
  3. High — this asset
  4. Critical

Highpartial confidence

A band marked partial is a floor. At least one high-severity check could not be evaluated, so the real band can only be worse than the one shown, never better.

44.98 USDC (shortened; full value 44.989260955646472841491032184001484351248184830103 USDC)

Limited by liquidation depth

Liquidation termbinds
44.98 USDC (shortened; full value 44.989260955646472841491032184001484351248184830103 USDC)

Sell-side depth at the liquidation delta, times the haircut.

Manipulation term
not applicable

Not applied: the critical target is not reachable through the order book.

These bands come from thresholds that were chosen, not calibrated

The thresholds were chosen based on the magnitude of the Blend incident of February 2026 and on conservative judgement, not calibrated against a set of incidents. Every flag is reported separately so that consumers can apply their own thresholds.

Every threshold, as the engine serves it

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → maxSafeCollateral, maxSafeCollateralLiquidation, maxSafeCollateralManipulation
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What this computation could not do

  • maxReachablePrice and costToMaxReachablePrice are null because an active pool is present: under a constant product curve the price tends to infinity as the base reserve tends to zero, so every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning
  • manipulation to delta 0.5 is unreachable through the order book; the manipulation term was not applied

Served by the engine with this response and shown as written.

Where does the price come from?

Two venues can disagree. Both readings are shown, not only the one that won.
Mid price
1.0025 USDC

Source: order book mid

Spread
1.4962 % (shortened; full value 1.49625935162094763092269327 %)

Undefined unless the price came from a two-sided book

Pool spot price
1.00322211 USDC (shortened; full value 1.0032221149560975 USDC)

Reported whenever an active pool exists, whichever source won

Divergence between the two
0.0719 % (shortened; full value 0.07197956916341510577166337 %)

Null means there is no pool to diverge from, not that the sources agree

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → midPrice, priceSource, spreadPct, poolSpotPrice, priceDivergencePct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What volume can it absorb before the price moves?

Three rungs at 2, 5 and 10 per cent, in each direction. The buy side matters for oracle manipulation and the sell side for liquidation.
  • SDEX
  • AMM
  • Sell side, composition not reported

2% from mid

Buy side
29.91 USDC (shortened; full value 29.9111893283295192500317015368 USDC)
Sell side
48.38 USDC (shortened; full value 48.384655408052839464089735602949719423667247218729 USDC)

5% from mid

Buy side
44.86 USDC (shortened; full value 44.8624230978684951779706349172 USDC)
Sell side
63.77 USDC (shortened; full value 63.775965259663508828579955102724378293374731836733 USDC)

10% from mid

Buy side
69.31 USDC (shortened; full value 69.3141584738695374240781615059 USDC)
Sell side
89.97 USDC (shortened; full value 89.978521911292945682982064368002968702496369660206 USDC)

Bars share one scale. The venue split decomposes the buy side; the sell side is drawn as an outline because its composition is not reported.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → depth[]
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What would it cost to move the price?

Read cost together with reachability: a figure on an unreachable rung says how far the book goes, not what the move costs.
Cost to move the price by each delta, through all venues and through the order book alone, with whether the target is reachable at all.
MoveTarget priceCost, all venuesCost, order book only
0.5%1.50375 USDC247.71 USDC (shortened; full value 247.7159928646709637908698714304 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 20.18 USDC (shortened; full value 20.18637457 USDC)
1%2.005 USDC439.84 USDC (shortened; full value 439.8401605695478060135561640988 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 20.18 USDC (shortened; full value 20.18637457 USDC)
10%11.0275 USDC2,368.91 USDC (shortened; full value 2368.9144150815469379715807811924 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 20.18 USDC (shortened; full value 20.18637457 USDC)
100%101.2525 USDC9,196.53 USDC (shortened; full value 9196.5343511651313657007046742671 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 20.18 USDC (shortened; full value 20.18637457 USDC)

Reachability on the all-venues ladder is unconditionally true whenever an active pool exists, because a constant product curve has no upper price bound. The order-book-only column is the one that answers whether a target is attainable, and it is the one Keel itself uses.

How far the book actually goes

Furthest price the book reaches
not computed

Null by structure, not by failure: an active pool means every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning

Cost to walk it that far
not computed

Null for the same reason as the price above

Against genuine volume

Not reported for this asset. Without it there is no comparison between the cost of an attack and the genuine trading it would have to hide inside.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → manipulationCostCombined[], manipulationCostOrderbookOnly[], oracleResistance
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Which checks fired, and which could not run?

An unevaluated check is not a check that came back clear. The two never share a treatment.

Triggered(3)

  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREME
  • THIN_DEPTH_5PCT
  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH

Could not be evaluated(3)

  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_30D
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_7D
  • WASH_TRADE_SUSPECTED
Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → flags[], unevaluatedFlags[], bandConfidence
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Who holds it, and is it genuinely traded?

Concentration and wash trading bound how much of the depth above is real.
Largest holder
52.8101 % (shortened; full value 52.81015427906333327039996117 %)
Top ten holders
98.1636 % (shortened; full value 98.16363165502545923853084492 %)
Concentration index
3,341.74 (shortened; full value 3341.7416616098767580515014239208251510898601990894167346)

Herfindahl–Hirschman, over the holder distribution

Volume excluded as not genuine
not computed

Of 30 day volume. A high share indicates suspected wash trading

Volume to supply, 30 day
not computed
Last genuine trade
not computed

No genuine trade was found in the window

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → holderTop1Pct, holderTop10Pct, holderHhi, volumeToSupply, lastGenuineTrade, tradesExcludedPct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

How has this moved over time?

A single reading cannot separate a thin asset from one that just got thin. This is a stored series, not the historical replay that health reports as unavailable — those are different endpoints.

162 readings from horizon, with no gaps reported. One source per chart.

Band at each reading

Medium
18 of 162
High
144 of 162

Which checks were firing

Whether a finding has been there all along or started recently. Only checks that fired at least once appear.

THIN_DEPTH_5PCTthroughout
HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREME144 of 162
HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH144 of 162

Price

Lowest
0.9975 USDC
Highest
1.003 USDC
2026-09-11T17:48:23Z2026-09-18T10:45:48Z
Mid price
1.0025 USDC

Buy-side depth

What an order can absorb before the price moves against a buyer. The rungs are nested, so one scale covers all three, and the lines darken as the rung widens.

Lowest
19.65 USDC (shortened; full value 19.6538421854006411971318254581 USDC)
Highest
92.22 USDC (shortened; full value 92.227661507575376379006701939 USDC)
2026-09-11T17:48:23Z2026-09-18T10:45:48ZOne scale across every line on this chart
2% from mid
29.91 USDC (shortened; full value 29.9111893283295192500317015368 USDC)
5% from mid
44.86 USDC (shortened; full value 44.8624230978684951779706349172 USDC)
10% from mid
69.31 USDC (shortened; full value 69.3141584738695374240781615059 USDC)

Cost to move the price by half

The series carries one manipulation rung, at the half per cent delta the engine treats as critical. A reading the engine could not produce breaks the line rather than sitting at zero.

No point in this range carried a value.

Collateral ceiling

Lowest
31.60 USDC (shortened; full value 31.605873827457950872509817594425168776933632867355 USDC)
Highest
46.08 USDC (shortened; full value 46.08176490241713184837451876313015506460734303302 USDC)
2026-09-11T17:48:23Z2026-09-18T10:45:48Z
Max safe collateral
44.98 USDC (shortened; full value 44.989260955646472841491032184001484351248184830103 USDC)
Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/history → points[], gaps[], dataSource
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What was this computed from?

Ledger
64,488,696

Closed at 2026-09-18T11:00:58Z

Computed at
2026-09-18T11:01:04.793056Z
Data source
horizon
Methodology
1.0.8-draft

The version that produced these figures, not the one this page was built against