Skip to content
Keel
Ledger
64,489,596
Methodology
1.0.8-draft
Age
7s

What depth stands behind this price?

USDGLO against USDC · GBBS25…HWS6XV

How much can this asset safely back?

The ceiling is the lower of two independent limits. Which one binds is the part a lender acts on, so both are shown.
  1. Low
  2. Medium
  3. High — this asset
  4. Critical

Highpartial confidence

A band marked partial is a floor. At least one high-severity check could not be evaluated, so the real band can only be worse than the one shown, never better.

44.82 USDC (shortened; full value 44.826020670865496782287712076311580665761749270431 USDC)

Limited by liquidation depth

Liquidation termbinds
44.82 USDC (shortened; full value 44.826020670865496782287712076311580665761749270431 USDC)

Sell-side depth at the liquidation delta, times the haircut.

Manipulation term
not applicable

Not applied: the critical target is not reachable through the order book.

These bands come from thresholds that were chosen, not calibrated

The thresholds were chosen based on the magnitude of the Blend incident of February 2026 and on conservative judgement, not calibrated against a set of incidents. Every flag is reported separately so that consumers can apply their own thresholds.

Every threshold, as the engine serves it

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → maxSafeCollateral, maxSafeCollateralLiquidation, maxSafeCollateralManipulation
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What this computation could not do

  • maxReachablePrice and costToMaxReachablePrice are null because an active pool is present: under a constant product curve the price tends to infinity as the base reserve tends to zero, so every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning
  • manipulation to delta 0.5 is unreachable through the order book; the manipulation term was not applied

Served by the engine with this response and shown as written.

Where does the price come from?

Two venues can disagree. Both readings are shown, not only the one that won.
Mid price
1.0025 USDC

Source: order book mid

Spread
1.4962 % (shortened; full value 1.49625935162094763092269327 %)

Undefined unless the price came from a two-sided book

Pool spot price
1.00257249 USDC (shortened; full value 1.0025724994366027 USDC)

Reported whenever an active pool exists, whichever source won

Divergence between the two
0.0072 % (shortened; full value 0.00723134103951995293811144 %)

Null means there is no pool to diverge from, not that the sources agree

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → midPrice, priceSource, spreadPct, poolSpotPrice, priceDivergencePct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What volume can it absorb before the price moves?

Three rungs at 2, 5 and 10 per cent, in each direction. The buy side matters for oracle manipulation and the sell side for liquidation.
  • SDEX
  • AMM
  • Sell side, composition not reported

2% from mid

Buy side
30.23 USDC (shortened; full value 30.2396678597672250102292005819 USDC)
Sell side
48.05 USDC (shortened; full value 48.058154600497091227167538298818320095301733655456 USDC)

5% from mid

Buy side
45.19 USDC (shortened; full value 45.1909089040080190217703354009 USDC)
Sell side
63.44 USDC (shortened; full value 63.44947194093386592067122739905104490747971836214 USDC)

10% from mid

Buy side
69.64 USDC (shortened; full value 69.6426561772936958976559176924 USDC)
Sell side
89.65 USDC (shortened; full value 89.652041341730993564575424152623161331523498540862 USDC)

Bars share one scale. The venue split decomposes the buy side; the sell side is drawn as an outline because its composition is not reported.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → depth[]
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What would it cost to move the price?

Read cost together with reachability: a figure on an unreachable rung says how far the book goes, not what the move costs.
Cost to move the price by each delta, through all venues and through the order book alone, with whether the target is reachable at all.
MoveTarget priceCost, all venuesCost, order book only
0.5%1.50375 USDC248.04 USDC (shortened; full value 248.044577371643845871313582737 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 20.18 USDC (shortened; full value 20.18637457 USDC)
1%2.005 USDC440.16 USDC (shortened; full value 440.1688385568349982061566008674 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 20.18 USDC (shortened; full value 20.18637457 USDC)
10%11.0275 USDC2,369.24 USDC (shortened; full value 2369.2440316830115840582335175805 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 20.18 USDC (shortened; full value 20.18637457 USDC)
100%101.2525 USDC9,196.86 USDC (shortened; full value 9196.8672898268304925334390631492 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 20.18 USDC (shortened; full value 20.18637457 USDC)

Reachability on the all-venues ladder is unconditionally true whenever an active pool exists, because a constant product curve has no upper price bound. The order-book-only column is the one that answers whether a target is attainable, and it is the one Keel itself uses.

How far the book actually goes

Furthest price the book reaches
not computed

Null by structure, not by failure: an active pool means every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning

Cost to walk it that far
not computed

Null for the same reason as the price above

Against genuine volume

Not reported for this asset. Without it there is no comparison between the cost of an attack and the genuine trading it would have to hide inside.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → manipulationCostCombined[], manipulationCostOrderbookOnly[], oracleResistance
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Which checks fired, and which could not run?

An unevaluated check is not a check that came back clear. The two never share a treatment.

Triggered(3)

  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREME
  • THIN_DEPTH_5PCT
  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH

Could not be evaluated(3)

  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_30D
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_7D
  • WASH_TRADE_SUSPECTED
Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → flags[], unevaluatedFlags[], bandConfidence
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Who holds it, and is it genuinely traded?

Concentration and wash trading bound how much of the depth above is real.
Largest holder
52.8101 % (shortened; full value 52.81015427906333327039996117 %)
Top ten holders
98.1636 % (shortened; full value 98.16363165502545923853084492 %)
Concentration index
3,341.74 (shortened; full value 3341.7416616098767580515014239208251510898601990894167346)

Herfindahl–Hirschman, over the holder distribution

Volume excluded as not genuine
not computed

Of 30 day volume. A high share indicates suspected wash trading

Volume to supply, 30 day
not computed
Last genuine trade
not computed

No genuine trade was found in the window

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → holderTop1Pct, holderTop10Pct, holderHhi, volumeToSupply, lastGenuineTrade, tradesExcludedPct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

How has this moved over time?

A single reading cannot separate a thin asset from one that just got thin. This is a stored series, not the historical replay that health reports as unavailable — those are different endpoints.

8 readings from horizon, with no gaps reported. One source per chart.

Band at each reading

Medium
1 of 8
High
7 of 8

Which checks were firing

Whether a finding has been there all along or started recently. Only checks that fired at least once appear.

THIN_DEPTH_5PCTthroughout
HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREME7 of 8
HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH7 of 8

Price

Lowest
0.99750000 USDC (shortened; full value 0.99750000495000005 USDC)
Highest
1.0025 USDC
2026-09-11T23:48:22Z2026-09-18T12:00:58Z
Mid price
1.0025 USDC

Buy-side depth

What an order can absorb before the price moves against a buyer. The rungs are nested, so one scale covers all three, and the lines darken as the rung widens.

Lowest
26.96 USDC (shortened; full value 26.9667829198002322365422388332 USDC)
Highest
78.69 USDC (shortened; full value 78.6960690186165531109593110446 USDC)
2026-09-11T23:48:22Z2026-09-18T12:00:58ZOne scale across every line on this chart
2% from mid
30.23 USDC (shortened; full value 30.2396678597672250102292005819 USDC)
5% from mid
45.19 USDC (shortened; full value 45.1909089040080190217703354009 USDC)
10% from mid
69.64 USDC (shortened; full value 69.6426561772936958976559176924 USDC)

Cost to move the price by half

The series carries one manipulation rung, at the half per cent delta the engine treats as critical. A reading the engine could not produce breaks the line rather than sitting at zero.

No point in this range carried a value.

Collateral ceiling

Lowest
37.12 USDC (shortened; full value 37.123300694273399737707566273915954312186879367183 USDC)
Highest
45.16 USDC (shortened; full value 45.165410148595971358631746483312238188356193550804 USDC)
2026-09-11T23:48:22Z2026-09-18T12:00:58Z
Max safe collateral
44.82 USDC (shortened; full value 44.826020670865496782287712076311580665761749270431 USDC)
Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/history → points[], gaps[], dataSource
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What was this computed from?

Ledger
64,489,596

Closed at 2026-09-18T12:15:58Z

Computed at
2026-09-18T12:16:05.980056Z
Data source
horizon
Methodology
1.0.8-draft

The version that produced these figures, not the one this page was built against