Skip to content
Keel
Ledger
64,489,595
Methodology
1.0.8-draft
Age
10s

What depth stands behind this price?

THE1 against USDC · GBGRBC…5LIEVW

How much can this asset safely back?

The ceiling is the lower of two independent limits. Which one binds is the part a lender acts on, so both are shown.
  1. Low
  2. Medium
  3. High — this asset
  4. Critical

Highpartial confidence

A band marked partial is a floor. At least one high-severity check could not be evaluated, so the real band can only be worse than the one shown, never better.

94.09 USDC (shortened; full value 94.09439494279841392185394552301127785717356384176 USDC)

Limited by liquidation depth

Liquidation termbinds
94.09 USDC (shortened; full value 94.09439494279841392185394552301127785717356384176 USDC)

Sell-side depth at the liquidation delta, times the haircut.

Manipulation term
not applicable

Not applied: the critical target is not reachable through the order book.

These bands come from thresholds that were chosen, not calibrated

The thresholds were chosen based on the magnitude of the Blend incident of February 2026 and on conservative judgement, not calibrated against a set of incidents. Every flag is reported separately so that consumers can apply their own thresholds.

Every threshold, as the engine serves it

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → maxSafeCollateral, maxSafeCollateralLiquidation, maxSafeCollateralManipulation
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What this computation could not do

  • maxReachablePrice and costToMaxReachablePrice are null because an active pool is present: under a constant product curve the price tends to infinity as the base reserve tends to zero, so every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning
  • manipulation to delta 0.5 is unreachable through the order book; the manipulation term was not applied

Served by the engine with this response and shown as written.

Where does the price come from?

Two venues can disagree. Both readings are shown, not only the one that won.
Mid price
3.78460837 USDC (shortened; full value 3.7846083705235938 USDC)

Source: AMM pool spot

Spread
not computed

Undefined unless the price came from a two-sided book

Pool spot price
3.78460837 USDC (shortened; full value 3.7846083705235938 USDC)

Reported whenever an active pool exists, whichever source won

Divergence between the two
not computed

Null means there is no pool to diverge from, not that the sources agree

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → midPrice, priceSource, spreadPct, poolSpotPrice, priceDivergencePct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What volume can it absorb before the price moves?

Three rungs at 2, 5 and 10 per cent, in each direction. The buy side matters for oracle manipulation and the sell side for liquidation.
  • SDEX
  • AMM
  • Sell side, composition not reported

2% from mid

Buy side
36.71 USDC (shortened; full value 36.7104181099497078260299969043 USDC)
Sell side
36.85 USDC (shortened; full value 36.85725219645623352841770614226715201647661388 USDC)

5% from mid

Buy side
91.10 USDC (shortened; full value 91.1076979713419198123381927225 USDC)
Sell side
92.85 USDC (shortened; full value 92.85566693178313868941857349500841227433088709128 USDC)

10% from mid

Buy side
180.07 USDC (shortened; full value 180.0707837505864206398283763975 USDC)
Sell side
188.18 USDC (shortened; full value 188.18878988559682784370789104602255571434712768352 USDC)

Bars share one scale. The venue split decomposes the buy side; the sell side is drawn as an outline because its composition is not reported.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → depth[]
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What would it cost to move the price?

Read cost together with reachability: a figure on an unreachable rung says how far the book goes, not what the move costs.
Cost to move the price by each delta, through all venues and through the order book alone, with whether the target is reachable at all.
MoveTarget priceCost, all venuesCost, order book only
0.5%5.676912 USDC (shortened; full value 5.6769125557853907 USDC)829.15 USDC (shortened; full value 829.1526363073880477704616660722 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 0 USDC
1%7.569216 USDC (shortened; full value 7.5692167410471876 USDC)1,528.16 USDC (shortened; full value 1528.1606432634251320684826996504 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 0 USDC
10%41.630692 USDC (shortened; full value 41.6306920757595318 USDC)8,546.73 USDC (shortened; full value 8546.7380873462553587377903251058 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 0 USDC
100%382.245445 USDC (shortened; full value 382.2454454228829738 USDC)33,387.76 USDC (shortened; full value 33387.761789821068491271124598845 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 0 USDC

Reachability on the all-venues ladder is unconditionally true whenever an active pool exists, because a constant product curve has no upper price bound. The order-book-only column is the one that answers whether a target is attainable, and it is the one Keel itself uses.

How far the book actually goes

Furthest price the book reaches
not computed

Null by structure, not by failure: an active pool means every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning

Cost to walk it that far
not computed

Null for the same reason as the price above

Against genuine volume

Not reported for this asset. Without it there is no comparison between the cost of an attack and the genuine trading it would have to hide inside.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → manipulationCostCombined[], manipulationCostOrderbookOnly[], oracleResistance
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Which checks fired, and which could not run?

An unevaluated check is not a check that came back clear. The two never share a treatment.

Triggered(3)

  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREME
  • THIN_DEPTH_5PCT
  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH

Could not be evaluated(5)

  • PRICE_SOURCE_CONFLICT
  • SPREAD_EXTREME
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_30D
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_7D
  • WASH_TRADE_SUSPECTED
Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → flags[], unevaluatedFlags[], bandConfidence
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Who holds it, and is it genuinely traded?

Concentration and wash trading bound how much of the depth above is real.
Largest holder
50.8701 % (shortened; full value 50.87015953650622029064173658 %)
Top ten holders
100 %
Concentration index
4,614.60 (shortened; full value 4614.6032323937758123821504633556862164924815395410444597)

Herfindahl–Hirschman, over the holder distribution

Volume excluded as not genuine
not computed

Of 30 day volume. A high share indicates suspected wash trading

Volume to supply, 30 day
not computed
Last genuine trade
not computed

No genuine trade was found in the window

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → holderTop1Pct, holderTop10Pct, holderHhi, volumeToSupply, lastGenuineTrade, tradesExcludedPct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

How has this moved over time?

A single reading cannot separate a thin asset from one that just got thin. This is a stored series, not the historical replay that health reports as unavailable — those are different endpoints.

8 readings from horizon, with no gaps reported. One source per chart.

Band at each reading

Medium
1 of 8
High
7 of 8

Which checks were firing

Whether a finding has been there all along or started recently. Only checks that fired at least once appear.

THIN_DEPTH_5PCTthroughout
HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREME7 of 8
HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH7 of 8

Price

Lowest
3.78521863 USDC (shortened; full value 3.7852186307294726 USDC)
Highest
5.32674640 USDC (shortened; full value 5.3267464033037306 USDC)
2026-09-11T23:48:17Z2026-09-18T12:00:53Z
Mid price
3.78521863 USDC (shortened; full value 3.7852186307294726 USDC)

Buy-side depth

What an order can absorb before the price moves against a buyer. The rungs are nested, so one scale covers all three, and the lines darken as the rung widens.

Lowest
35.02 USDC (shortened; full value 35.0256400051476861293511134881 USDC)
Highest
185.56 USDC (shortened; full value 185.5664005354030226541695963064 USDC)
2026-09-11T23:48:17Z2026-09-18T12:00:53ZOne scale across every line on this chart
2% from mid
36.71 USDC (shortened; full value 36.7133732329594900768360240174 USDC)
5% from mid
91.11 USDC (shortened; full value 91.1150319781036252306576842467 USDC)
10% from mid
180.08 USDC (shortened; full value 180.0852791266635091491475084508 USDC)

Cost to move the price by half

The series carries one manipulation rung, at the half per cent delta the engine treats as critical. A reading the engine could not produce breaks the line rather than sitting at zero.

No point in this range carried a value.

Collateral ceiling

Lowest
89.77 USDC (shortened; full value 89.776051961538426703529667635889509255881838379162 USDC)
Highest
96.96 USDC (shortened; full value 96.966080873376929216538618591012487367186764475562 USDC)
2026-09-11T23:48:17Z2026-09-18T12:00:53Z
Max safe collateral
94.10 USDC (shortened; full value 94.101969373325306746248791302455674988348501586248 USDC)
Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/history → points[], gaps[], dataSource
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What was this computed from?

Ledger
64,489,595

Closed at 2026-09-18T12:15:53Z

Computed at
2026-09-18T12:16:03.608803Z
Data source
horizon
Methodology
1.0.8-draft

The version that produced these figures, not the one this page was built against