Skip to content
Keel
Ledger
64,488,694
Methodology
1.0.8-draft
Age
9s

What depth stands behind this price?

SHX against USDC · GDSTRS…7KJ6JH

How much can this asset safely back?

The ceiling is the lower of two independent limits. Which one binds is the part a lender acts on, so both are shown.
  1. Low
  2. Medium
  3. High
  4. Critical — this asset

Criticalpartial confidence

A band marked partial is a floor. At least one high-severity check could not be evaluated, so the real band can only be worse than the one shown, never better.

365.55 USDC (shortened; full value 365.5520080512070696373912575 USDC)

Limited by manipulation cost

Liquidation term
381.57 USDC (shortened; full value 381.570322468625077260094656836541192896343966715875 USDC)

Sell-side depth at the liquidation delta, times the haircut.

Manipulation termbinds
365.55 USDC (shortened; full value 365.5520080512070696373912575 USDC)

Order-book-only manipulation cost at the critical delta, times the safety margin.

These bands come from thresholds that were chosen, not calibrated

The thresholds were chosen based on the magnitude of the Blend incident of February 2026 and on conservative judgement, not calibrated against a set of incidents. Every flag is reported separately so that consumers can apply their own thresholds.

Every threshold, as the engine serves it

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → maxSafeCollateral, maxSafeCollateralLiquidation, maxSafeCollateralManipulation
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What this computation could not do

  • maxReachablePrice and costToMaxReachablePrice are null because an active pool is present: under a constant product curve the price tends to infinity as the base reserve tends to zero, so every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning

Served by the engine with this response and shown as written.

Where does the price come from?

Two venues can disagree. Both readings are shown, not only the one that won.
Mid price
0.00361500 USDC (shortened; full value 0.00361500003694575 USDC)

Source: order book mid

Spread
15.7670 % (shortened; full value 15.76708594111291413309199244 %)

Undefined unless the price came from a two-sided book

Pool spot price
0.00334013 USDC (shortened; full value 0.003340137797927 USDC)

Reported whenever an active pool exists, whichever source won

Divergence between the two
8.2290 % (shortened; full value 8.22906884827741529779971411 %)

Null means there is no pool to diverge from, not that the sources agree

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → midPrice, priceSource, spreadPct, poolSpotPrice, priceDivergencePct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What volume can it absorb before the price moves?

Three rungs at 2, 5 and 10 per cent, in each direction. The buy side matters for oracle manipulation and the sell side for liquidation.
  • SDEX
  • AMM
  • Sell side, composition not reported

2% from mid

Buy side
760.12 USDC (shortened; full value 760.1213922468746501150441249298 USDC)
Sell side
0 USDC

5% from mid

Buy side
990.16 USDC (shortened; full value 990.1691540003808825568663454301 USDC)
Sell side
0 USDC

10% from mid

Buy side
1,836.98 USDC (shortened; full value 1836.9848014160208415152888934905 USDC)
Sell side
763.14 USDC (shortened; full value 763.14064493725015452018931367308238579268793343175 USDC)

Bars share one scale. The venue split decomposes the buy side; the sell side is drawn as an outline because its composition is not reported.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → depth[]
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What would it cost to move the price?

Read cost together with reachability: a figure on an unreachable rung says how far the book goes, not what the move costs.
Cost to move the price by each delta, through all venues and through the order book alone, with whether the target is reachable at all.
MoveTarget priceCost, all venuesCost, order book only
0.5%0.005422 USDC (shortened; full value 0.005422500055418625 USDC)5,573.59 USDC (shortened; full value 5573.5918235976779572073425870194 USDC)1,462.20 USDC (shortened; full value 1462.20803220482827854956503 USDC)
1%0.007230 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0072300000738915 USDC)9,028.24 USDC (shortened; full value 9028.2460142810303963761437716745 USDC)1,960.73 USDC (shortened; full value 1960.73596330759565218766387 USDC)
10%0.039765 USDC (shortened; full value 0.03976500040640325 USDC)118,754.52 USDC (shortened; full value 118754.5257976319072128631217089348 USDC)82,005.23 USDC (shortened; full value 82005.2368816301962024068925 USDC)
100%0.365115 USDC (shortened; full value 0.36511500373152075 USDC)532,358.65 USDC (shortened; full value 532358.6521479745485582227611752179 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 390,555.91 USDC (shortened; full value 390555.9135561553447824068925 USDC)

Reachability on the all-venues ladder is unconditionally true whenever an active pool exists, because a constant product curve has no upper price bound. The order-book-only column is the one that answers whether a target is attainable, and it is the one Keel itself uses.

How far the book actually goes

Furthest price the book reaches
not computed

Null by structure, not by failure: an active pool means every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning

Cost to walk it that far
not computed

Null for the same reason as the price above

Against genuine volume

Not reported for this asset. Without it there is no comparison between the cost of an attack and the genuine trading it would have to hide inside.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → manipulationCostCombined[], manipulationCostOrderbookOnly[], oracleResistance
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Which checks fired, and which could not run?

An unevaluated check is not a check that came back clear. The two never share a treatment.

Triggered(3)

  • ZERO_DEPTH_2PCT
  • MANIPULATION_CHEAP
  • THIN_DEPTH_5PCT

Could not be evaluated(6)

  • MANIPULATION_RATIO_LOW
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_30D
  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREME
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_7D
  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH
  • WASH_TRADE_SUSPECTED
Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → flags[], unevaluatedFlags[], bandConfidence
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Who holds it, and is it genuinely traded?

Concentration and wash trading bound how much of the depth above is real.
Largest holder
not computed
Top ten holders
not computed
Concentration index
not computed

Herfindahl–Hirschman, over the holder distribution

Volume excluded as not genuine
not computed

Of 30 day volume. A high share indicates suspected wash trading

Volume to supply, 30 day
not computed
Last genuine trade
not computed

No genuine trade was found in the window

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → holderTop1Pct, holderTop10Pct, holderHhi, volumeToSupply, lastGenuineTrade, tradesExcludedPct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

How has this moved over time?

A single reading cannot separate a thin asset from one that just got thin. This is a stored series, not the historical replay that health reports as unavailable — those are different endpoints.

162 readings from horizon, with no gaps reported. One source per chart.

Band at each reading

Critical
162 of 162

Which checks were firing

Whether a finding has been there all along or started recently. Only checks that fired at least once appear.

MANIPULATION_CHEAPthroughout
THIN_DEPTH_5PCTthroughout
ZERO_DEPTH_2PCT97 of 162

Price

Lowest
0.00330475 USDC
Highest
0.00394717 USDC (shortened; full value 0.00394717799278205 USDC)
2026-09-11T17:48:12Z2026-09-18T10:45:43Z
Mid price
0.00361499 USDC (shortened; full value 0.003614995059122 USDC)

Buy-side depth

What an order can absorb before the price moves against a buyer. The rungs are nested, so one scale covers all three, and the lines darken as the rung widens.

Lowest
0 USDC
Highest
3,026.64 USDC (shortened; full value 3026.6425753068059591431318515036 USDC)
2026-09-11T17:48:12Z2026-09-18T10:45:43ZOne scale across every line on this chart
2% from mid
757.67 USDC (shortened; full value 757.6739200631958600860746724284 USDC)
5% from mid
987.72 USDC (shortened; full value 987.721467289293445416275177503 USDC)
10% from mid
1,834.53 USDC (shortened; full value 1834.5367638598119920192290949948 USDC)

Cost to move the price by half

The series carries one manipulation rung, at the half per cent delta the engine treats as critical. A reading the engine could not produce breaks the line rather than sitting at zero.

Lowest
979.41 USDC (shortened; full value 979.41546750391440890326414 USDC)
Highest
5,974.20 USDC (shortened; full value 5974.20972250444119048988824 USDC)
2026-09-11T17:48:12Z2026-09-18T10:45:43Z
Manipulation cost, 0.5%
1,462.20 USDC (shortened; full value 1462.20803220482827854956503 USDC)

Collateral ceiling

Lowest
164.76 USDC (shortened; full value 164.768705176680441836089565056072617613558142726151 USDC)
Highest
1,308.05 USDC (shortened; full value 1308.0520225009924051435142775 USDC)
2026-09-11T17:48:12Z2026-09-18T10:45:43Z
Max safe collateral
365.55 USDC (shortened; full value 365.5520080512070696373912575 USDC)
Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/history → points[], gaps[], dataSource
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What was this computed from?

Ledger
64,488,694

Closed at 2026-09-18T11:00:48Z

Computed at
2026-09-18T11:00:57.294093Z
Data source
horizon
Methodology
1.0.8-draft

The version that produced these figures, not the one this page was built against