Skip to content
Keel
Ledger
64,489,595
Methodology
1.0.8-draft
Age
5s

What depth stands behind this price?

SHX against USDC · GDSTRS…7KJ6JH

How much can this asset safely back?

The ceiling is the lower of two independent limits. Which one binds is the part a lender acts on, so both are shown.
  1. Low
  2. Medium
  3. High
  4. Critical — this asset

Criticalpartial confidence

A band marked partial is a floor. At least one high-severity check could not be evaluated, so the real band can only be worse than the one shown, never better.

364.42 USDC (shortened; full value 364.4291108013552029795387925 USDC)

Limited by manipulation cost

Liquidation term
445.10 USDC (shortened; full value 445.10688785869415472431897069505490613033601330628 USDC)

Sell-side depth at the liquidation delta, times the haircut.

Manipulation termbinds
364.42 USDC (shortened; full value 364.4291108013552029795387925 USDC)

Order-book-only manipulation cost at the critical delta, times the safety margin.

These bands come from thresholds that were chosen, not calibrated

The thresholds were chosen based on the magnitude of the Blend incident of February 2026 and on conservative judgement, not calibrated against a set of incidents. Every flag is reported separately so that consumers can apply their own thresholds.

Every threshold, as the engine serves it

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → maxSafeCollateral, maxSafeCollateralLiquidation, maxSafeCollateralManipulation
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What this computation could not do

  • maxReachablePrice and costToMaxReachablePrice are null because an active pool is present: under a constant product curve the price tends to infinity as the base reserve tends to zero, so every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning

Served by the engine with this response and shown as written.

Where does the price come from?

Two venues can disagree. Both readings are shown, not only the one that won.
Mid price
0.00356449 USDC (shortened; full value 0.00356449511423665 USDC)

Source: order book mid

Spread
13.1572 % (shortened; full value 13.15726949940667871342337025 %)

Undefined unless the price came from a two-sided book

Pool spot price
0.00334559 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0033455948996256 USDC)

Reported whenever an active pool exists, whichever source won

Divergence between the two
6.5429 % (shortened; full value 6.54293843631656544866114009 %)

Null means there is no pool to diverge from, not that the sources agree

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → midPrice, priceSource, spreadPct, poolSpotPrice, priceDivergencePct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What volume can it absorb before the price moves?

Three rungs at 2, 5 and 10 per cent, in each direction. The buy side matters for oracle manipulation and the sell side for liquidation.
  • SDEX
  • AMM
  • Sell side, composition not reported

2% from mid

Buy side
637.42 USDC (shortened; full value 637.4225900319966506132288143509 USDC)
Sell side
0 USDC

5% from mid

Buy side
865.86 USDC (shortened; full value 865.8604648833596493366408730926 USDC)
Sell side
0 USDC

10% from mid

Buy side
1,574.88 USDC (shortened; full value 1574.8894446493580520382178231527 USDC)
Sell side
890.21 USDC (shortened; full value 890.21377571738830944863794139010981226067202661256 USDC)

Bars share one scale. The venue split decomposes the buy side; the sell side is drawn as an outline because its composition is not reported.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → depth[]
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What would it cost to move the price?

Read cost together with reachability: a figure on an unreachable rung says how far the book goes, not what the move costs.
Cost to move the price by each delta, through all venues and through the order book alone, with whether the target is reachable at all.
MoveTarget priceCost, all venuesCost, order book only
0.5%0.005346 USDC (shortened; full value 0.005346742671354975 USDC)5,422.94 USDC (shortened; full value 5422.9491136087761773887948750237 USDC)1,457.71 USDC (shortened; full value 1457.71644320542081191815517 USDC)
1%0.007128 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0071289902284733 USDC)8,861.78 USDC (shortened; full value 8861.7868026769775428614699704222 USDC)1,961.11 USDC (shortened; full value 1961.11500700856113136421647 USDC)
10%0.039209 USDC (shortened; full value 0.03920944625660315 USDC)115,857.77 USDC (shortened; full value 115857.7759881862906268134919653842 USDC)79,483.04 USDC (shortened; full value 79483.0400501319389075229325 USDC)
100%0.360014 USDC (shortened; full value 0.36001400653790165 USDC)527,826.73 USDC (shortened; full value 527826.7325140280977633304538974975 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 387,133.71 USDC (shortened; full value 387133.7167247567495175229325 USDC)

Reachability on the all-venues ladder is unconditionally true whenever an active pool exists, because a constant product curve has no upper price bound. The order-book-only column is the one that answers whether a target is attainable, and it is the one Keel itself uses.

How far the book actually goes

Furthest price the book reaches
not computed

Null by structure, not by failure: an active pool means every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning

Cost to walk it that far
not computed

Null for the same reason as the price above

Against genuine volume

Not reported for this asset. Without it there is no comparison between the cost of an attack and the genuine trading it would have to hide inside.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → manipulationCostCombined[], manipulationCostOrderbookOnly[], oracleResistance
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Which checks fired, and which could not run?

An unevaluated check is not a check that came back clear. The two never share a treatment.

Triggered(3)

  • ZERO_DEPTH_2PCT
  • MANIPULATION_CHEAP
  • THIN_DEPTH_5PCT

Could not be evaluated(6)

  • MANIPULATION_RATIO_LOW
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_30D
  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREME
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_7D
  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH
  • WASH_TRADE_SUSPECTED
Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → flags[], unevaluatedFlags[], bandConfidence
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Who holds it, and is it genuinely traded?

Concentration and wash trading bound how much of the depth above is real.
Largest holder
not computed
Top ten holders
not computed
Concentration index
not computed

Herfindahl–Hirschman, over the holder distribution

Volume excluded as not genuine
not computed

Of 30 day volume. A high share indicates suspected wash trading

Volume to supply, 30 day
not computed
Last genuine trade
not computed

No genuine trade was found in the window

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → holderTop1Pct, holderTop10Pct, holderHhi, volumeToSupply, lastGenuineTrade, tradesExcludedPct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

How has this moved over time?

A single reading cannot separate a thin asset from one that just got thin. This is a stored series, not the historical replay that health reports as unavailable — those are different endpoints.

No readings were stored in this range from this source

The engine accepted the request and returned nothing for Trades implied. The series is as old as the deployment, and the reconstruction sources are not populated in production, so a window can reach back further than anything that was recorded. It is not empty because the figures were zero.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/history → points[], gaps[], dataSource
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What was this computed from?

Ledger
64,489,595

Closed at 2026-09-18T12:15:53Z

Computed at
2026-09-18T12:15:58.153099Z
Data source
horizon
Methodology
1.0.8-draft

The version that produced these figures, not the one this page was built against