Skip to content
Keel
Ledger
64,490,135
Methodology
1.0.8-draft
Age
5s

What depth stands behind this price?

SHX against USDC · GDSTRS…7KJ6JH

How much can this asset safely back?

The ceiling is the lower of two independent limits. Which one binds is the part a lender acts on, so both are shown.
  1. Low
  2. Medium
  3. High
  4. Critical — this asset

Criticalpartial confidence

A band marked partial is a floor. At least one high-severity check could not be evaluated, so the real band can only be worse than the one shown, never better.

358.12 USDC (shortened; full value 358.123209600977151564290825 USDC)

Limited by manipulation cost

Liquidation term
3,817.53 USDC (shortened; full value 3817.539454619249519469045047939197797333712313726114 USDC)

Sell-side depth at the liquidation delta, times the haircut.

Manipulation termbinds
358.12 USDC (shortened; full value 358.123209600977151564290825 USDC)

Order-book-only manipulation cost at the critical delta, times the safety margin.

These bands come from thresholds that were chosen, not calibrated

The thresholds were chosen based on the magnitude of the Blend incident of February 2026 and on conservative judgement, not calibrated against a set of incidents. Every flag is reported separately so that consumers can apply their own thresholds.

Every threshold, as the engine serves it

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → maxSafeCollateral, maxSafeCollateralLiquidation, maxSafeCollateralManipulation
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What this computation could not do

  • maxReachablePrice and costToMaxReachablePrice are null because an active pool is present: under a constant product curve the price tends to infinity as the base reserve tends to zero, so every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning

Served by the engine with this response and shown as written.

Where does the price come from?

Two venues can disagree. Both readings are shown, not only the one that won.
Mid price
0.00331000 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0033100097708711 USDC)

Source: order book mid

Spread
1.2078 % (shortened; full value 1.20786526401335321995680031 %)

Undefined unless the price came from a two-sided book

Pool spot price
0.00335849 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0033584945865358 USDC)

Reported whenever an active pool exists, whichever source won

Divergence between the two
1.4436 % (shortened; full value 1.44364727753546355983213088 %)

Null means there is no pool to diverge from, not that the sources agree

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → midPrice, priceSource, spreadPct, poolSpotPrice, priceDivergencePct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What volume can it absorb before the price moves?

Three rungs at 2, 5 and 10 per cent, in each direction. The buy side matters for oracle manipulation and the sell side for liquidation.
  • SDEX
  • AMM
  • Sell side, composition not reported

2% from mid

Buy side
39.61 USDC (shortened; full value 39.6112138208763914847680225899 USDC)
Sell side
849.88 USDC (shortened; full value 849.885826347121160217896201248129557256718319299188 USDC)

5% from mid

Buy side
259.74 USDC (shortened; full value 259.7459546000571880893967236575 USDC)
Sell side
1,104.43 USDC (shortened; full value 1104.430420390198987557768006716446173258098974553486 USDC)

10% from mid

Buy side
619.76 USDC (shortened; full value 619.7614898773903677506474807524 USDC)
Sell side
7,635.07 USDC (shortened; full value 7635.078909238499038938090095878395594667424627452228 USDC)

Bars share one scale. The venue split decomposes the buy side; the sell side is drawn as an outline because its composition is not reported.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → depth[]
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What would it cost to move the price?

Read cost together with reachability: a figure on an unreachable rung says how far the book goes, not what the move costs.
Cost to move the price by each delta, through all venues and through the order book alone, with whether the target is reachable at all.
MoveTarget priceCost, all venuesCost, order book only
0.5%0.004965 USDC (shortened; full value 0.00496501465630665 USDC)4,678.95 USDC (shortened; full value 4678.9567135514483620341322925242 USDC)1,432.49 USDC (shortened; full value 1432.4928384039086062571633 USDC)
1%0.006620 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0066200195417422 USDC)7,742.96 USDC (shortened; full value 7742.9678723679900421910663806649 USDC)1,667.76 USDC (shortened; full value 1667.76059670621692255972254 USDC)
10%0.036410 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0364101074795821 USDC)97,770.72 USDC (shortened; full value 97770.7235909556098666073662546468 USDC)63,292.75 USDC (shortened; full value 63292.75922470727675463575655 USDC)
100%0.334310 USDC (shortened; full value 0.3343109868579811 USDC)522,212.68 USDC (shortened; full value 522212.6822451500997840216439323594 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 387,208.14 USDC (shortened; full value 387208.14141464573433463575655 USDC)

Reachability on the all-venues ladder is unconditionally true whenever an active pool exists, because a constant product curve has no upper price bound. The order-book-only column is the one that answers whether a target is attainable, and it is the one Keel itself uses.

How far the book actually goes

Furthest price the book reaches
not computed

Null by structure, not by failure: an active pool means every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning

Cost to walk it that far
not computed

Null for the same reason as the price above

Against genuine volume

Not reported for this asset. Without it there is no comparison between the cost of an attack and the genuine trading it would have to hide inside.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → manipulationCostCombined[], manipulationCostOrderbookOnly[], oracleResistance
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Which checks fired, and which could not run?

An unevaluated check is not a check that came back clear. The two never share a treatment.

Triggered(2)

  • MANIPULATION_CHEAP
  • THIN_DEPTH_5PCT

Could not be evaluated(6)

  • MANIPULATION_RATIO_LOW
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_30D
  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREME
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_7D
  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH
  • WASH_TRADE_SUSPECTED
Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → flags[], unevaluatedFlags[], bandConfidence
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Who holds it, and is it genuinely traded?

Concentration and wash trading bound how much of the depth above is real.
Largest holder
not computed
Top ten holders
not computed
Concentration index
not computed

Herfindahl–Hirschman, over the holder distribution

Volume excluded as not genuine
not computed

Of 30 day volume. A high share indicates suspected wash trading

Volume to supply, 30 day
not computed
Last genuine trade
not computed

No genuine trade was found in the window

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → holderTop1Pct, holderTop10Pct, holderHhi, volumeToSupply, lastGenuineTrade, tradesExcludedPct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

How has this moved over time?

A single reading cannot separate a thin asset from one that just got thin. This is a stored series, not the historical replay that health reports as unavailable — those are different endpoints.

No readings were stored in this range from this source

The engine accepted the request and returned nothing for Trades implied. The series is as old as the deployment, and the reconstruction sources are not populated in production, so a window can reach back further than anything that was recorded. It is not empty because the figures were zero.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/history → points[], gaps[], dataSource
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What was this computed from?

Ledger
64,490,135

Closed at 2026-09-18T13:00:53Z

Computed at
2026-09-18T13:00:58.399693Z
Data source
horizon
Methodology
1.0.8-draft

The version that produced these figures, not the one this page was built against