What depth stands behind this price?
REAL8 against USDC · GBVYYQ…Q3W4CD
How much can this asset safely back?
- Low
- Medium
- High
- Critical — this asset
Criticalpartial confidence
A band marked partial is a floor. At least one high-severity check could not be evaluated, so the real band can only be worse than the one shown, never better.
0 USDC
Limited by manipulation cost
- Liquidation term
- 27.75 USDC (shortened; full value 27.754682615318954473030736285705650212561302579802 USDC)
Sell-side depth at the liquidation delta, times the haircut.
- Manipulation termbinds
- 0 USDC
Order-book-only manipulation cost at the critical delta, times the safety margin.
These bands come from thresholds that were chosen, not calibrated
The thresholds were chosen based on the magnitude of the Blend incident of February 2026 and on conservative judgement, not calibrated against a set of incidents. Every flag is reported separately so that consumers can apply their own thresholds.
Where this number comes from
- Source
- GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → maxSafeCollateral, maxSafeCollateralLiquidation, maxSafeCollateralManipulation
- What it is
- Awaiting methodology copy.
- What it does not account for
- Awaiting methodology copy.
What this computation could not do
- maxReachablePrice and costToMaxReachablePrice are null because an active pool is present: under a constant product curve the price tends to infinity as the base reserve tends to zero, so every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning
Served by the engine with this response and shown as written.
Where does the price come from?
- Mid price
- 0.00091312 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0009131275652155 USDC)
Source: AMM pool spot
- Spread
- not computed
Undefined unless the price came from a two-sided book
- Pool spot price
- 0.00091312 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0009131275652155 USDC)
Reported whenever an active pool exists, whichever source won
- Divergence between the two
- not computed
Null means there is no pool to diverge from, not that the sources agree
Where this number comes from
- Source
- GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → midPrice, priceSource, spreadPct, poolSpotPrice, priceDivergencePct
- What it is
- Awaiting methodology copy.
- What it does not account for
- Awaiting methodology copy.
What volume can it absorb before the price moves?
- SDEX
- AMM
- Sell side, composition not reported
2% from mid
5% from mid
10% from mid
Bars share one scale. The venue split decomposes the buy side; the sell side is drawn as an outline because its composition is not reported.
Where this number comes from
- Source
- GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → depth[]
- What it is
- Awaiting methodology copy.
- What it does not account for
- Awaiting methodology copy.
What would it cost to move the price?
| Move | Target price | Cost, all venues | Cost, order book only |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5% | 0.001369 USDC (shortened; full value 0.00136969134782325 USDC) | 244.57 USDC (shortened; full value 244.5721477284216296655444086811 USDC) | free to reach |
| 1% | 0.001826 USDC (shortened; full value 0.001826255130431 USDC) | 450.75 USDC (shortened; full value 450.7560058681707292019154651906 USDC) | free to reach |
| 10% | 0.010044 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0100444032173705 USDC) | 2,658.80 USDC (shortened; full value 2658.800354535025218199910328165 USDC) | unreachablebook ends at 137.8 USDC |
| 100% | 0.092225 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0922258840867655 USDC) | 9,986.06 USDC (shortened; full value 9986.0670755861044265969865767359 USDC) | unreachablebook ends at 137.8 USDC |
Reachability on the all-venues ladder is unconditionally true whenever an active pool exists, because a constant product curve has no upper price bound. The order-book-only column is the one that answers whether a target is attainable, and it is the one Keel itself uses.
How far the book actually goes
- Furthest price the book reaches
- not computed
Null by structure, not by failure: an active pool means every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning
- Cost to walk it that far
- not computed
Null for the same reason as the price above
Against genuine volume
Not reported for this asset. Without it there is no comparison between the cost of an attack and the genuine trading it would have to hide inside.
Where this number comes from
- Source
- GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → manipulationCostCombined[], manipulationCostOrderbookOnly[], oracleResistance
- What it is
- Awaiting methodology copy.
- What it does not account for
- Awaiting methodology copy.
Which checks fired, and which could not run?
Triggered(4)
- MANIPULATION_CHEAP
- MANIPULATION_RATIO_LOW
- THIN_DEPTH_5PCT
- HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH
Could not be evaluated(5)
- PRICE_SOURCE_CONFLICT
- SPREAD_EXTREME
- NO_GENUINE_TRADE_30D
- NO_GENUINE_TRADE_7D
- WASH_TRADE_SUSPECTED
Where this number comes from
- Source
- GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → flags[], unevaluatedFlags[], bandConfidence
- What it is
- Awaiting methodology copy.
- What it does not account for
- Awaiting methodology copy.
Who holds it, and is it genuinely traded?
- Largest holder
- 25.1290 % (shortened; full value 25.12906173788038642876373248 %)
- Top ten holders
- 92.5920 % (shortened; full value 92.59205255690978301597214484 %)
- Concentration index
- 1,409.01 (shortened; full value 1409.0181432016242704565965463908161634388815287848308987)
Herfindahl–Hirschman, over the holder distribution
- Volume excluded as not genuine
- not computed
Of 30 day volume. A high share indicates suspected wash trading
- Volume to supply, 30 day
- not computed
- Last genuine trade
- not computed
No genuine trade was found in the window
Where this number comes from
- Source
- GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → holderTop1Pct, holderTop10Pct, holderHhi, volumeToSupply, lastGenuineTrade, tradesExcludedPct
- What it is
- Awaiting methodology copy.
- What it does not account for
- Awaiting methodology copy.
How has this moved over time?
162 readings from horizon, with no gaps reported. One source per chart.
Band at each reading
- Critical
- 162 of 162
Which checks were firing
Whether a finding has been there all along or started recently. Only checks that fired at least once appear.
MANIPULATION_CHEAPTHIN_DEPTH_5PCTMANIPULATION_RATIO_LOWHOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGHPrice
- Lowest
- 0.00089260 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0008926075802959 USDC)
- Highest
- 0.00113988 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0011398806721352 USDC)
- Mid price
- 0.00091312 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0009131275652155 USDC)
Buy-side depth
What an order can absorb before the price moves against a buyer. The rungs are nested, so one scale covers all three, and the lines darken as the rung widens.
- Lowest
- 9.81 USDC (shortened; full value 9.8136282547056642297053312509 USDC)
- Highest
- 54.37 USDC (shortened; full value 54.3764662158925810475513907781 USDC)
- 2% from mid
- 10.82 USDC (shortened; full value 10.8283389668078468423081244104 USDC)
- 5% from mid
- 26.87 USDC (shortened; full value 26.8737074354338772988402160224 USDC)
- 10% from mid
- 53.11 USDC (shortened; full value 53.1148263860723279051363405914 USDC)
Cost to move the price by half
The series carries one manipulation rung, at the half per cent delta the engine treats as critical. A reading the engine could not produce breaks the line rather than sitting at zero.
- Lowest
- 0 USDC
- Highest
- 0 USDC
- Manipulation cost, 0.5%
- 0 USDC
Collateral ceiling
- Lowest
- 0 USDC
- Highest
- 0 USDC
- Max safe collateral
- 0 USDC
Where this number comes from
- Source
- GET /asset/{assetId}/history → points[], gaps[], dataSource
- What it is
- Awaiting methodology copy.
- What it does not account for
- Awaiting methodology copy.
What was this computed from?
- Ledger
- 64,488,694
Closed at 2026-09-18T11:00:48Z
- Computed at
- 2026-09-18T11:00:55.792699Z
- Data source
- horizon
- Methodology
- 1.0.8-draft
The version that produced these figures, not the one this page was built against