Skip to content
Keel
Ledger
64,488,693
Methodology
1.0.8-draft
Age
6s

What depth stands behind this price?

HU against USDC · GBGRBC…5LIEVW

How much can this asset safely back?

The ceiling is the lower of two independent limits. Which one binds is the part a lender acts on, so both are shown.
  1. Low
  2. Medium
  3. High — this asset
  4. Critical

Highpartial confidence

A band marked partial is a floor. At least one high-severity check could not be evaluated, so the real band can only be worse than the one shown, never better.

1.18 USDC (shortened; full value 1.18427322156900728966704053513603634281668754336 USDC)

Limited by liquidation depth

Liquidation termbinds
1.18 USDC (shortened; full value 1.18427322156900728966704053513603634281668754336 USDC)

Sell-side depth at the liquidation delta, times the haircut.

Manipulation term
not applicable

Not applied: the critical target is not reachable through the order book.

These bands come from thresholds that were chosen, not calibrated

The thresholds were chosen based on the magnitude of the Blend incident of February 2026 and on conservative judgement, not calibrated against a set of incidents. Every flag is reported separately so that consumers can apply their own thresholds.

Every threshold, as the engine serves it

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → maxSafeCollateral, maxSafeCollateralLiquidation, maxSafeCollateralManipulation
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What this computation could not do

  • maxReachablePrice and costToMaxReachablePrice are null because an active pool is present: under a constant product curve the price tends to infinity as the base reserve tends to zero, so every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning
  • manipulation to delta 0.5 is unreachable through the order book; the manipulation term was not applied

Served by the engine with this response and shown as written.

Where does the price come from?

Two venues can disagree. Both readings are shown, not only the one that won.
Mid price
0.00004793 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0000479392894275 USDC)

Source: AMM pool spot

Spread
not computed

Undefined unless the price came from a two-sided book

Pool spot price
0.00004793 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0000479392894275 USDC)

Reported whenever an active pool exists, whichever source won

Divergence between the two
not computed

Null means there is no pool to diverge from, not that the sources agree

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → midPrice, priceSource, spreadPct, poolSpotPrice, priceDivergencePct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What volume can it absorb before the price moves?

Three rungs at 2, 5 and 10 per cent, in each direction. The buy side matters for oracle manipulation and the sell side for liquidation.
  • SDEX
  • AMM
  • Sell side, composition not reported

2% from mid

Buy side
0.46 USDC (shortened; full value 0.4620377775599137637356240277 USDC)
Sell side
0.46 USDC (shortened; full value 0.46388583319350317371144417248900957361596968 USDC)

5% from mid

Buy side
1.14 USDC (shortened; full value 1.1466826164496755598260439801 USDC)
Sell side
1.16 USDC (shortened; full value 1.16868257546150387851027103257943344676457450608 USDC)

10% from mid

Buy side
2.26 USDC (shortened; full value 2.2663731172553175624542527121 USDC)
Sell side
2.36 USDC (shortened; full value 2.36854644313801457933408107027207268563337508672 USDC)

Bars share one scale. The venue split decomposes the buy side; the sell side is drawn as an outline because its composition is not reported.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → depth[]
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What would it cost to move the price?

Read cost together with reachability: a figure on an unreachable rung says how far the book goes, not what the move costs.
Cost to move the price by each delta, through all venues and through the order book alone, with whether the target is reachable at all.
MoveTarget priceCost, all venuesCost, order book only
0.5%0.000071 USDC (shortened; full value 0.00007190893414125 USDC)10.43 USDC (shortened; full value 10.4357253624844064978112509521 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 0 USDC
1%0.000095 USDC (shortened; full value 0.000095878578855 USDC)19.23 USDC (shortened; full value 19.233448806092294401888220655 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 0 USDC
10%0.000527 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0005273321837025 USDC)107.56 USDC (shortened; full value 107.5693515512929646095020908403 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 0 USDC
100%0.004841 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0048418682321775 USDC)420.21 USDC (shortened; full value 420.2187839121255052386216319484 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 0 USDC

Reachability on the all-venues ladder is unconditionally true whenever an active pool exists, because a constant product curve has no upper price bound. The order-book-only column is the one that answers whether a target is attainable, and it is the one Keel itself uses.

How far the book actually goes

Furthest price the book reaches
not computed

Null by structure, not by failure: an active pool means every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning

Cost to walk it that far
not computed

Null for the same reason as the price above

Against genuine volume

Not reported for this asset. Without it there is no comparison between the cost of an attack and the genuine trading it would have to hide inside.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → manipulationCostCombined[], manipulationCostOrderbookOnly[], oracleResistance
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Which checks fired, and which could not run?

An unevaluated check is not a check that came back clear. The two never share a treatment.

Triggered(3)

  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREME
  • THIN_DEPTH_5PCT
  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH

Could not be evaluated(5)

  • PRICE_SOURCE_CONFLICT
  • SPREAD_EXTREME
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_30D
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_7D
  • WASH_TRADE_SUSPECTED
Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → flags[], unevaluatedFlags[], bandConfidence
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Who holds it, and is it genuinely traded?

Concentration and wash trading bound how much of the depth above is real.
Largest holder
97.5568 % (shortened; full value 97.556832285851753800336638 %)
Top ten holders
100 %
Concentration index
9,523.30 (shortened; full value 9523.3043048005009086906611844707033982664602368052210834)

Herfindahl–Hirschman, over the holder distribution

Volume excluded as not genuine
not computed

Of 30 day volume. A high share indicates suspected wash trading

Volume to supply, 30 day
not computed
Last genuine trade
not computed

No genuine trade was found in the window

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → holderTop1Pct, holderTop10Pct, holderHhi, volumeToSupply, lastGenuineTrade, tradesExcludedPct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

How has this moved over time?

A single reading cannot separate a thin asset from one that just got thin. This is a stored series, not the historical replay that health reports as unavailable — those are different endpoints.

162 readings from horizon, with no gaps reported. One source per chart.

Band at each reading

Medium
18 of 162
High
144 of 162

Which checks were firing

Whether a finding has been there all along or started recently. Only checks that fired at least once appear.

THIN_DEPTH_5PCTthroughout
HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREME144 of 162
HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH144 of 162

Price

Lowest
0.00004792 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0000479275149606 USDC)
Highest
0.00010185 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0001018583312166 USDC)
2026-09-11T17:48:07Z2026-09-18T10:45:43Z
Mid price
0.00004811 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0000481137044209 USDC)

Buy-side depth

What an order can absorb before the price moves against a buyer. The rungs are nested, so one scale covers all three, and the lines darken as the rung widens.

Lowest
0.46 USDC (shortened; full value 0.4619669434175830540206384752 USDC)
Highest
3.30 USDC (shortened; full value 3.3004240782158683842968690206 USDC)
2026-09-11T17:48:07Z2026-09-18T10:45:43ZOne scale across every line on this chart
2% from mid
0.46 USDC (shortened; full value 0.4628762558731196379014771321 USDC)
5% from mid
1.14 USDC (shortened; full value 1.1487635469551871918512037139 USDC)
10% from mid
2.27 USDC (shortened; full value 2.2704859946015968059809883097 USDC)

Cost to move the price by half

The series carries one manipulation rung, at the half per cent delta the engine treats as critical. A reading the engine could not produce breaks the line rather than sitting at zero.

No point in this range carried a value.

Collateral ceiling

Lowest
1.18 USDC (shortened; full value 1.184091662869677364594605049122752886754145121846 USDC)
Highest
1.72 USDC (shortened; full value 1.724607402856122558743263687516494045595784446032 USDC)
2026-09-11T17:48:07Z2026-09-18T10:45:43Z
Max safe collateral
1.18 USDC (shortened; full value 1.186422369239226321012829009350902893112930681556 USDC)
Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/history → points[], gaps[], dataSource
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What was this computed from?

Ledger
64,488,693

Closed at 2026-09-18T11:00:43Z

Computed at
2026-09-18T11:00:49.117851Z
Data source
horizon
Methodology
1.0.8-draft

The version that produced these figures, not the one this page was built against