Skip to content
Keel
Ledger
64,489,593
Methodology
1.0.8-draft
Age
6s

What depth stands behind this price?

HU against USDC · GBGRBC…5LIEVW

How much can this asset safely back?

The ceiling is the lower of two independent limits. Which one binds is the part a lender acts on, so both are shown.
  1. Low
  2. Medium
  3. High — this asset
  4. Critical

Highpartial confidence

A band marked partial is a floor. At least one high-severity check could not be evaluated, so the real band can only be worse than the one shown, never better.

1.16 USDC (shortened; full value 1.169741703069654934779332739962396153625520998234 USDC)

Limited by liquidation depth

Liquidation termbinds
1.16 USDC (shortened; full value 1.169741703069654934779332739962396153625520998234 USDC)

Sell-side depth at the liquidation delta, times the haircut.

Manipulation term
not applicable

Not applied: the critical target is not reachable through the order book.

These bands come from thresholds that were chosen, not calibrated

The thresholds were chosen based on the magnitude of the Blend incident of February 2026 and on conservative judgement, not calibrated against a set of incidents. Every flag is reported separately so that consumers can apply their own thresholds.

Every threshold, as the engine serves it

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → maxSafeCollateral, maxSafeCollateralLiquidation, maxSafeCollateralManipulation
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What this computation could not do

  • maxReachablePrice and costToMaxReachablePrice are null because an active pool is present: under a constant product curve the price tends to infinity as the base reserve tends to zero, so every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning
  • manipulation to delta 0.5 is unreachable through the order book; the manipulation term was not applied

Served by the engine with this response and shown as written.

Where does the price come from?

Two venues can disagree. Both readings are shown, not only the one that won.
Mid price
0.00004676 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0000467682997725 USDC)

Source: AMM pool spot

Spread
not computed

Undefined unless the price came from a two-sided book

Pool spot price
0.00004676 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0000467682997725 USDC)

Reported whenever an active pool exists, whichever source won

Divergence between the two
not computed

Null means there is no pool to diverge from, not that the sources agree

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → midPrice, priceSource, spreadPct, poolSpotPrice, priceDivergencePct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What volume can it absorb before the price moves?

Three rungs at 2, 5 and 10 per cent, in each direction. The buy side matters for oracle manipulation and the sell side for liquidation.
  • SDEX
  • AMM
  • Sell side, composition not reported

2% from mid

Buy side
0.45 USDC (shortened; full value 0.4563683843914047130974456201 USDC)
Sell side
0.45 USDC (shortened; full value 0.4581937636238577726206370809415719373661037545 USDC)

5% from mid

Buy side
1.13 USDC (shortened; full value 1.1326123501037491773478514749 USDC)
Sell side
1.15 USDC (shortened; full value 1.154342360588883777871634284467126572374410684727 USDC)

10% from mid

Buy side
2.23 USDC (shortened; full value 2.2385637889010063233623990887 USDC)
Sell side
2.33 USDC (shortened; full value 2.339483406139309869558665479924792307251041996468 USDC)

Bars share one scale. The venue split decomposes the buy side; the sell side is drawn as an outline because its composition is not reported.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → depth[]
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What would it cost to move the price?

Read cost together with reachability: a figure on an unreachable rung says how far the book goes, not what the move costs.
Cost to move the price by each delta, through all venues and through the order book alone, with whether the target is reachable at all.
MoveTarget priceCost, all venuesCost, order book only
0.5%0.000070 USDC (shortened; full value 0.00007015244965875 USDC)10.30 USDC (shortened; full value 10.3076747290687574171163482656 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 0 USDC
1%0.000093 USDC (shortened; full value 0.000093536599545 USDC)18.99 USDC (shortened; full value 18.9974464951037986108768531114 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 0 USDC
10%0.000514 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0005144512974975 USDC)106.24 USDC (shortened; full value 106.2494314572119835332035633362 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 0 USDC
100%0.004723 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0047235982770225 USDC)415.06 USDC (shortened; full value 415.0625269597778056371961128038 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 0 USDC

Reachability on the all-venues ladder is unconditionally true whenever an active pool exists, because a constant product curve has no upper price bound. The order-book-only column is the one that answers whether a target is attainable, and it is the one Keel itself uses.

How far the book actually goes

Furthest price the book reaches
not computed

Null by structure, not by failure: an active pool means every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning

Cost to walk it that far
not computed

Null for the same reason as the price above

Against genuine volume

Not reported for this asset. Without it there is no comparison between the cost of an attack and the genuine trading it would have to hide inside.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → manipulationCostCombined[], manipulationCostOrderbookOnly[], oracleResistance
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Which checks fired, and which could not run?

An unevaluated check is not a check that came back clear. The two never share a treatment.

Triggered(3)

  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREME
  • THIN_DEPTH_5PCT
  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH

Could not be evaluated(5)

  • PRICE_SOURCE_CONFLICT
  • SPREAD_EXTREME
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_30D
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_7D
  • WASH_TRADE_SUSPECTED
Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → flags[], unevaluatedFlags[], bandConfidence
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Who holds it, and is it genuinely traded?

Concentration and wash trading bound how much of the depth above is real.
Largest holder
97.5568 % (shortened; full value 97.556832285851753800336638 %)
Top ten holders
100 %
Concentration index
9,523.30 (shortened; full value 9523.3043048005009086906611844707033982664602368052210834)

Herfindahl–Hirschman, over the holder distribution

Volume excluded as not genuine
not computed

Of 30 day volume. A high share indicates suspected wash trading

Volume to supply, 30 day
not computed
Last genuine trade
not computed

No genuine trade was found in the window

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → holderTop1Pct, holderTop10Pct, holderHhi, volumeToSupply, lastGenuineTrade, tradesExcludedPct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

How has this moved over time?

A single reading cannot separate a thin asset from one that just got thin. This is a stored series, not the historical replay that health reports as unavailable — those are different endpoints.

164 readings from horizon, with no gaps reported. One source per chart.

Band at each reading

Medium
18 of 164
High
146 of 164

Which checks were firing

Whether a finding has been there all along or started recently. Only checks that fired at least once appear.

THIN_DEPTH_5PCTthroughout
HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREME146 of 164
HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH146 of 164

Price

Lowest
0.00004702 USDC (shortened; full value 0.000047021045396 USDC)
Highest
0.00010185 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0001018583312166 USDC)
2026-09-11T17:48:07Z2026-09-18T12:00:43Z
Mid price
0.00004702 USDC (shortened; full value 0.000047021045396 USDC)

Buy-side depth

What an order can absorb before the price moves against a buyer. The rungs are nested, so one scale covers all three, and the lines darken as the rung widens.

Lowest
0.45 USDC (shortened; full value 0.4575980239030295690898363886 USDC)
Highest
3.30 USDC (shortened; full value 3.3004240782158683842968690206 USDC)
2026-09-11T17:48:07Z2026-09-18T12:00:43ZOne scale across every line on this chart
2% from mid
0.45 USDC (shortened; full value 0.4575980239030295690898363886 USDC)
5% from mid
1.13 USDC (shortened; full value 1.1356640621518988582710960156 USDC)
10% from mid
2.24 USDC (shortened; full value 2.2445953778065264049542566917 USDC)

Cost to move the price by half

The series carries one manipulation rung, at the half per cent delta the engine treats as critical. A reading the engine could not produce breaks the line rather than sitting at zero.

No point in this range carried a value.

Collateral ceiling

Lowest
1.17 USDC (shortened; full value 1.172893456490102628768513703746735015472355575134 USDC)
Highest
1.72 USDC (shortened; full value 1.724607402856122558743263687516494045595784446032 USDC)
2026-09-11T17:48:07Z2026-09-18T12:00:43Z
Max safe collateral
1.17 USDC (shortened; full value 1.172893456490102628768513703746735015472355575134 USDC)
Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/history → points[], gaps[], dataSource
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What was this computed from?

Ledger
64,489,593

Closed at 2026-09-18T12:15:43Z

Computed at
2026-09-18T12:15:49.677931Z
Data source
horizon
Methodology
1.0.8-draft

The version that produced these figures, not the one this page was built against