Skip to content
Keel
Ledger
64,489,593
Methodology
1.0.8-draft
Age
5s

What depth stands behind this price?

GZC against USDC · GCGZCF…FRIGZC

How much can this asset safely back?

The ceiling is the lower of two independent limits. Which one binds is the part a lender acts on, so both are shown.
  1. Low
  2. Medium — this asset
  3. High
  4. Critical

Mediumpartial confidence

A band marked partial is a floor. At least one high-severity check could not be evaluated, so the real band can only be worse than the one shown, never better.

73.97 USDC (shortened; full value 73.978808431077880206827891551300355981086183728816 USDC)

Limited by liquidation depth

Liquidation termbinds
73.97 USDC (shortened; full value 73.978808431077880206827891551300355981086183728816 USDC)

Sell-side depth at the liquidation delta, times the haircut.

Manipulation term
not applicable

Not applied: the critical target is not reachable through the order book.

These bands come from thresholds that were chosen, not calibrated

The thresholds were chosen based on the magnitude of the Blend incident of February 2026 and on conservative judgement, not calibrated against a set of incidents. Every flag is reported separately so that consumers can apply their own thresholds.

Every threshold, as the engine serves it

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → maxSafeCollateral, maxSafeCollateralLiquidation, maxSafeCollateralManipulation
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What this computation could not do

  • maxReachablePrice and costToMaxReachablePrice are null because an active pool is present: under a constant product curve the price tends to infinity as the base reserve tends to zero, so every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning
  • manipulation to delta 0.5 is unreachable through the order book; the manipulation term was not applied

Served by the engine with this response and shown as written.

Where does the price come from?

Two venues can disagree. Both readings are shown, not only the one that won.
Mid price
15.46850598 USDC (shortened; full value 15.4685059855818804 USDC)

Source: AMM pool spot

Spread
not computed

Undefined unless the price came from a two-sided book

Pool spot price
15.46850598 USDC (shortened; full value 15.4685059855818804 USDC)

Reported whenever an active pool exists, whichever source won

Divergence between the two
not computed

Null means there is no pool to diverge from, not that the sources agree

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → midPrice, priceSource, spreadPct, poolSpotPrice, priceDivergencePct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What volume can it absorb before the price moves?

Three rungs at 2, 5 and 10 per cent, in each direction. The buy side matters for oracle manipulation and the sell side for liquidation.
  • SDEX
  • AMM
  • Sell side, composition not reported

2% from mid

Buy side
28.86 USDC (shortened; full value 28.8624310771297098083730568137 USDC)
Sell side
28.97 USDC (shortened; full value 28.977874837232765347633013247922000423876285708 USDC)

5% from mid

Buy side
71.63 USDC (shortened; full value 71.6306102920986018413951721741 USDC)
Sell side
73.00 USDC (shortened; full value 73.004896836441255309650029431641978351648192167048 USDC)

10% from mid

Buy side
141.57 USDC (shortened; full value 141.5750855639913927892894217212 USDC)
Sell side
147.95 USDC (shortened; full value 147.957616862155760413655783102600711962172367457632 USDC)

Bars share one scale. The venue split decomposes the buy side; the sell side is drawn as an outline because its composition is not reported.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → depth[]
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What would it cost to move the price?

Read cost together with reachability: a figure on an unreachable rung says how far the book goes, not what the move costs.
Cost to move the price by each delta, through all venues and through the order book alone, with whether the target is reachable at all.
MoveTarget priceCost, all venuesCost, order book only
0.5%23.202758 USDC (shortened; full value 23.2027589783728206 USDC)651.89 USDC (shortened; full value 651.8956211876054220246261808288 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 0 USDC
1%30.937011 USDC (shortened; full value 30.9370119711637608 USDC)1,201.46 USDC (shortened; full value 1201.4690518879855423159678013149 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 0 USDC
10%170.153565 USDC (shortened; full value 170.1535658414006844 USDC)6,719.60 USDC (shortened; full value 6719.6085384124937335604737744172 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 0 USDC
100%1,562.319104 USDC (shortened; full value 1562.3191045437699204 USDC)26,250.09 USDC (shortened; full value 26250.0952888127060352505011635767 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 0 USDC

Reachability on the all-venues ladder is unconditionally true whenever an active pool exists, because a constant product curve has no upper price bound. The order-book-only column is the one that answers whether a target is attainable, and it is the one Keel itself uses.

How far the book actually goes

Furthest price the book reaches
not computed

Null by structure, not by failure: an active pool means every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning

Cost to walk it that far
not computed

Null for the same reason as the price above

Against genuine volume

Not reported for this asset. Without it there is no comparison between the cost of an attack and the genuine trading it would have to hide inside.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → manipulationCostCombined[], manipulationCostOrderbookOnly[], oracleResistance
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Which checks fired, and which could not run?

An unevaluated check is not a check that came back clear. The two never share a treatment.

Triggered(2)

  • THIN_DEPTH_5PCT
  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH

Could not be evaluated(5)

  • PRICE_SOURCE_CONFLICT
  • SPREAD_EXTREME
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_30D
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_7D
  • WASH_TRADE_SUSPECTED
Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → flags[], unevaluatedFlags[], bandConfidence
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Who holds it, and is it genuinely traded?

Concentration and wash trading bound how much of the depth above is real.
Largest holder
30.7734 % (shortened; full value 30.77340288970846053198143468 %)
Top ten holders
96.5138 % (shortened; full value 96.51384988518863377252412117 %)
Concentration index
1,955.60 (shortened; full value 1955.6063027693415377869729473503484545557632268090980528)

Herfindahl–Hirschman, over the holder distribution

Volume excluded as not genuine
not computed

Of 30 day volume. A high share indicates suspected wash trading

Volume to supply, 30 day
not computed
Last genuine trade
not computed

No genuine trade was found in the window

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → holderTop1Pct, holderTop10Pct, holderHhi, volumeToSupply, lastGenuineTrade, tradesExcludedPct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

How has this moved over time?

A single reading cannot separate a thin asset from one that just got thin. This is a stored series, not the historical replay that health reports as unavailable — those are different endpoints.

8 readings from horizon, with no gaps reported. One source per chart.

Band at each reading

Medium
8 of 8

Which checks were firing

Whether a finding has been there all along or started recently. Only checks that fired at least once appear.

THIN_DEPTH_5PCTthroughout
HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH7 of 8

Price

Lowest
15.20347831 USDC (shortened; full value 15.2034783178666945 USDC)
Highest
15.64232952 USDC (shortened; full value 15.6423295233203678 USDC)
2026-09-11T23:48:05Z2026-09-18T12:00:43Z
Mid price
15.46850598 USDC (shortened; full value 15.4685059855818804 USDC)

Buy-side depth

What an order can absorb before the price moves against a buyer. The rungs are nested, so one scale covers all three, and the lines darken as the rung widens.

Lowest
28.61 USDC (shortened; full value 28.6100039094522463149624047265 USDC)
Highest
142.33 USDC (shortened; full value 142.3352030183303832873932141368 USDC)
2026-09-11T23:48:05Z2026-09-18T12:00:43ZOne scale across every line on this chart
2% from mid
28.86 USDC (shortened; full value 28.8624310771297098083730568137 USDC)
5% from mid
71.63 USDC (shortened; full value 71.6306102920986018413951721741 USDC)
10% from mid
141.57 USDC (shortened; full value 141.5750855639913927892894217212 USDC)

Cost to move the price by half

The series carries one manipulation rung, at the half per cent delta the engine treats as critical. A reading the engine could not produce breaks the line rather than sitting at zero.

No point in this range carried a value.

Collateral ceiling

Lowest
73.33 USDC (shortened; full value 73.331799139639227407170579220349228736203049164708 USDC)
Highest
74.37 USDC (shortened; full value 74.376001081999824060851147009879950365541520730864 USDC)
2026-09-11T23:48:05Z2026-09-18T12:00:43Z
Max safe collateral
73.97 USDC (shortened; full value 73.978808431077880206827891551300355981086183728816 USDC)
Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/history → points[], gaps[], dataSource
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What was this computed from?

Ledger
64,489,593

Closed at 2026-09-18T12:15:43Z

Computed at
2026-09-18T12:15:48.912574Z
Data source
horizon
Methodology
1.0.8-draft

The version that produced these figures, not the one this page was built against