Skip to content
Keel
Ledger
64,489,231
Methodology
1.0.8-draft
Age
5s

What depth stands behind this price?

BTC against USDC · GDPJAL…5O2MZM

How much can this asset safely back?

The ceiling is the lower of two independent limits. Which one binds is the part a lender acts on, so both are shown.
  1. Low
  2. Medium — this asset
  3. High
  4. Critical

Mediumpartial confidence

A band marked partial is a floor. At least one high-severity check could not be evaluated, so the real band can only be worse than the one shown, never better.

1,441.05 USDC (shortened; full value 1441.05746370436175568846139707571305625876090460512 USDC)

Limited by liquidation depth

Liquidation termbinds
1,441.05 USDC (shortened; full value 1441.05746370436175568846139707571305625876090460512 USDC)

Sell-side depth at the liquidation delta, times the haircut.

Manipulation term
3,386.91 USDC (shortened; full value 3386.9180702461184666760143925 USDC)

Order-book-only manipulation cost at the critical delta, times the safety margin.

These bands come from thresholds that were chosen, not calibrated

The thresholds were chosen based on the magnitude of the Blend incident of February 2026 and on conservative judgement, not calibrated against a set of incidents. Every flag is reported separately so that consumers can apply their own thresholds.

Every threshold, as the engine serves it

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → maxSafeCollateral, maxSafeCollateralLiquidation, maxSafeCollateralManipulation
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What this computation could not do

  • maxReachablePrice and costToMaxReachablePrice are null because an active pool is present: under a constant product curve the price tends to infinity as the base reserve tends to zero, so every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning

Served by the engine with this response and shown as written.

Where does the price come from?

Two venues can disagree. Both readings are shown, not only the one that won.
Mid price
77,811.78974995 USDC (shortened; full value 77811.78974995031120875 USDC)

Source: order book mid

Spread
0.4917 % (shortened; full value 0.49175157277611232803248214 %)

Undefined unless the price came from a two-sided book

Pool spot price
77,854.38813795 USDC (shortened; full value 77854.3881379565543802 USDC)

Reported whenever an active pool exists, whichever source won

Divergence between the two
0.0547 % (shortened; full value 0.05471546180641687868467085 %)

Null means there is no pool to diverge from, not that the sources agree

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → midPrice, priceSource, spreadPct, poolSpotPrice, priceDivergencePct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What volume can it absorb before the price moves?

Three rungs at 2, 5 and 10 per cent, in each direction. The buy side matters for oracle manipulation and the sell side for liquidation.
  • SDEX
  • AMM
  • Sell side, composition not reported

2% from mid

Buy side
982.33 USDC (shortened; full value 982.336494937984991523693287268 USDC)
Sell side
548.47 USDC (shortened; full value 548.47885275090349518375007659458637908954121058112 USDC)

5% from mid

Buy side
1,769.95 USDC (shortened; full value 1769.959428276734029721148439814 USDC)
Sell side
1,359.28 USDC (shortened; full value 1359.28475680606981523546514184520630887109223654656 USDC)

10% from mid

Buy side
3,206.83 USDC (shortened; full value 3206.8373069914389356505843282992 USDC)
Sell side
2,882.11 USDC (shortened; full value 2882.11492740872351137692279415142611251752180921024 USDC)

Bars share one scale. The venue split decomposes the buy side; the sell side is drawn as an outline because its composition is not reported.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → depth[]
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What would it cost to move the price?

Read cost together with reachability: a figure on an unreachable rung says how far the book goes, not what the move costs.
Cost to move the price by each delta, through all venues and through the order book alone, with whether the target is reachable at all.
MoveTarget priceCost, all venuesCost, order book only
0.5%116,717.684624 USDC (shortened; full value 116717.684624925466813125 USDC)25,538.42 USDC (shortened; full value 25538.4253265026948882004052282413 USDC)13,547.67 USDC (shortened; full value 13547.67228098447386670405757 USDC)
1%155,623.579499 USDC (shortened; full value 155623.5794999006224175 USDC)84,810.54 USDC (shortened; full value 84810.5422578894037069301962185488 USDC)62,698.79 USDC (shortened; full value 62698.7916501983000518719567 USDC)
10%855,929.687249 USDC (shortened; full value 855929.68724945342329625 USDC)283,077.35 USDC (shortened; full value 283077.3538370893421556811928764999 USDC)159,343.01 USDC (shortened; full value 159343.0116501983000518719567 USDC)
100%7,858,990.764744 USDC (shortened; full value 7858990.76474498143208375 USDC)643,531.73 USDC (shortened; full value 643531.7362468417305730011664188331 USDC)160,122.05 USDC (shortened; full value 160122.0572501983000518719567 USDC)

Reachability on the all-venues ladder is unconditionally true whenever an active pool exists, because a constant product curve has no upper price bound. The order-book-only column is the one that answers whether a target is attainable, and it is the one Keel itself uses.

How far the book actually goes

Furthest price the book reaches
not computed

Null by structure, not by failure: an active pool means every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning

Cost to walk it that far
not computed

Null for the same reason as the price above

Against genuine volume

Not reported for this asset. Without it there is no comparison between the cost of an attack and the genuine trading it would have to hide inside.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → manipulationCostCombined[], manipulationCostOrderbookOnly[], oracleResistance
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Which checks fired, and which could not run?

An unevaluated check is not a check that came back clear. The two never share a treatment.

Triggered(1)

  • THIN_DEPTH_5PCT

Could not be evaluated(6)

  • MANIPULATION_RATIO_LOW
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_30D
  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREME
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_7D
  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH
  • WASH_TRADE_SUSPECTED
Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → flags[], unevaluatedFlags[], bandConfidence
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Who holds it, and is it genuinely traded?

Concentration and wash trading bound how much of the depth above is real.
Largest holder
not computed
Top ten holders
not computed
Concentration index
not computed

Herfindahl–Hirschman, over the holder distribution

Volume excluded as not genuine
not computed

Of 30 day volume. A high share indicates suspected wash trading

Volume to supply, 30 day
not computed
Last genuine trade
not computed

No genuine trade was found in the window

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → holderTop1Pct, holderTop10Pct, holderHhi, volumeToSupply, lastGenuineTrade, tradesExcludedPct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

How has this moved over time?

A single reading cannot separate a thin asset from one that just got thin. This is a stored series, not the historical replay that health reports as unavailable — those are different endpoints.

No readings were stored in this range from this source

The engine accepted the request and returned nothing for Trades implied. The series is as old as the deployment, and the reconstruction sources are not populated in production, so a window can reach back further than anything that was recorded. It is not empty because the figures were zero.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/history → points[], gaps[], dataSource
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What was this computed from?

Ledger
64,489,231

Closed at 2026-09-18T11:45:33Z

Computed at
2026-09-18T11:45:38.042379Z
Data source
horizon
Methodology
1.0.8-draft

The version that produced these figures, not the one this page was built against