What depth stands behind this price?
AIus against USDC · GDBYZG…3Z4QWU
How much can this asset safely back?
- Low
- Medium
- High
- Critical — this asset
Criticalpartial confidence
A band marked partial is a floor. At least one high-severity check could not be evaluated, so the real band can only be worse than the one shown, never better.
0.0000017 USDC (shortened; full value 0.000001775011085 USDC)
Limited by manipulation cost
- Liquidation term
- 32.96 USDC (shortened; full value 32.963991428798536119521097796793459978475555030744 USDC)
Sell-side depth at the liquidation delta, times the haircut.
- Manipulation termbinds
- 0.0000017 USDC (shortened; full value 0.000001775011085 USDC)
Order-book-only manipulation cost at the critical delta, times the safety margin.
These bands come from thresholds that were chosen, not calibrated
The thresholds were chosen based on the magnitude of the Blend incident of February 2026 and on conservative judgement, not calibrated against a set of incidents. Every flag is reported separately so that consumers can apply their own thresholds.
Where this number comes from
- Source
- GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → maxSafeCollateral, maxSafeCollateralLiquidation, maxSafeCollateralManipulation
- What it is
- Awaiting methodology copy.
- What it does not account for
- Awaiting methodology copy.
What this computation could not do
- maxReachablePrice and costToMaxReachablePrice are null because an active pool is present: under a constant product curve the price tends to infinity as the base reserve tends to zero, so every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning
Served by the engine with this response and shown as written.
Where does the price come from?
- Mid price
- 0.00243226 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0024322686403586 USDC)
Source: AMM pool spot
- Spread
- 101.3374 % (shortened; full value 101.3374712579159770801104152 %)
Undefined unless the price came from a two-sided book
- Pool spot price
- 0.00243226 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0024322686403586 USDC)
Reported whenever an active pool exists, whichever source won
- Divergence between the two
- 49.3312 % (shortened; full value 49.33124522589939549686932475 %)
PRICE_SOURCE_CONFLICT is triggered: the two sources disagree past the threshold and the pool was taken
Where this number comes from
- Source
- GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → midPrice, priceSource, spreadPct, poolSpotPrice, priceDivergencePct
- What it is
- Awaiting methodology copy.
- What it does not account for
- Awaiting methodology copy.
What volume can it absorb before the price moves?
SPREAD_EXTREME is triggered, so this ladder is not meaningful
The spread is past the threshold at which the engine says the mid price, and every figure derived from it including these rungs, stops describing an executable market.
- SDEX
- AMM
- Sell side, composition not reported
2% from mid
5% from mid
10% from mid
Bars share one scale. The venue split decomposes the buy side; the sell side is drawn as an outline because its composition is not reported.
Where this number comes from
- Source
- GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → depth[]
- What it is
- Awaiting methodology copy.
- What it does not account for
- Awaiting methodology copy.
What would it cost to move the price?
Every target price below is measured from the same unreliable mid
SPREAD_EXTREME is triggered. A target price is the mid price moved by the delta, so when the mid sits between quotes that are far apart, the targets describe a market that is not there. Reachability and the furthest price the book reaches are the readings that still mean something here.
| Move | Target price | Cost, all venues | Cost, order book only |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5% | 0.003648 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0036484029605379 USDC) | 290.47 USDC (shortened; full value 290.4761870363534869873478882801 USDC) | 0.0000071 USDC (shortened; full value 0.00000710004434 USDC) |
| 1% | 0.004864 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0048645372807172 USDC) | 541.98 USDC (shortened; full value 541.9844671526903272458962626497 USDC) | 6.62 USDC (shortened; full value 6.6255398012133 USDC) |
| 10% | 0.026754 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0267549550439446 USDC) | 4,799.84 USDC (shortened; full value 4799.8465641035454522495712856186 USDC) | 1,805.67 USDC (shortened; full value 1805.67670704947522 USDC) |
| 100% | 0.245659 USDC (shortened; full value 0.2456591326762186 USDC) | 13,525.06 USDC (shortened; full value 13525.0624124964527195574377422578 USDC) | 1,828.36 USDC (shortened; full value 1828.3625810612354 USDC) |
Reachability on the all-venues ladder is unconditionally true whenever an active pool exists, because a constant product curve has no upper price bound. The order-book-only column is the one that answers whether a target is attainable, and it is the one Keel itself uses.
How far the book actually goes
- Furthest price the book reaches
- not computed
Null by structure, not by failure: an active pool means every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning
- Cost to walk it that far
- not computed
Null for the same reason as the price above
Against genuine volume
Not reported for this asset. Without it there is no comparison between the cost of an attack and the genuine trading it would have to hide inside.
Where this number comes from
- Source
- GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → manipulationCostCombined[], manipulationCostOrderbookOnly[], oracleResistance
- What it is
- Awaiting methodology copy.
- What it does not account for
- Awaiting methodology copy.
Which checks fired, and which could not run?
Triggered(7)
- MANIPULATION_CHEAP
- MANIPULATION_RATIO_LOW
- PRICE_SOURCE_CONFLICT
- SPREAD_EXTREME
- HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREME
- THIN_DEPTH_5PCT
- HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH
Could not be evaluated(3)
- NO_GENUINE_TRADE_30D
- NO_GENUINE_TRADE_7D
- WASH_TRADE_SUSPECTED
Where this number comes from
- Source
- GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → flags[], unevaluatedFlags[], bandConfidence
- What it is
- Awaiting methodology copy.
- What it does not account for
- Awaiting methodology copy.
Who holds it, and is it genuinely traded?
- Largest holder
- 99.8369 % (shortened; full value 99.83697333089405143288941783 %)
- Top ten holders
- 99.9667 % (shortened; full value 99.96677645159268763373391069 %)
- Concentration index
- 9,967.42 (shortened; full value 9967.4268448255508958108825342712995587135097104086553491)
Herfindahl–Hirschman, over the holder distribution
- Volume excluded as not genuine
- not computed
Of 30 day volume. A high share indicates suspected wash trading
- Volume to supply, 30 day
- not computed
- Last genuine trade
- not computed
No genuine trade was found in the window
Where this number comes from
- Source
- GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → holderTop1Pct, holderTop10Pct, holderHhi, volumeToSupply, lastGenuineTrade, tradesExcludedPct
- What it is
- Awaiting methodology copy.
- What it does not account for
- Awaiting methodology copy.
How has this moved over time?
This source is a lower bound, not a measurement
Trades-implied rebuilds the book from trades that happened, so every figure below is a floor: the real value is at least this, and may be more. It is not comparable with a direct reading.
No readings were stored in this range from this source
The engine accepted the request and returned nothing for Trades implied. The series is as old as the deployment, and the reconstruction sources are not populated in production, so a window can reach back further than anything that was recorded. It is not empty because the figures were zero.
Where this number comes from
- Source
- GET /asset/{assetId}/history → points[], gaps[], dataSource
- What it is
- Awaiting methodology copy.
- What it does not account for
- Awaiting methodology copy.
What was this computed from?
- Ledger
- 64,489,410
Closed at 2026-09-18T12:00:28Z
- Computed at
- 2026-09-18T12:00:33.367846Z
- Data source
- horizon
- Methodology
- 1.0.8-draft
The version that produced these figures, not the one this page was built against