Is this price backed by executable depth?
An oracle answers what a Stellar asset is worth. Keel answers what volume that price can actually support, and what it would cost to move it. Every figure here is served by the engine; nothing is recomputed in this dashboard.
Review signal
What needs attention first?
No assets in the current view are in the high or critical bands. The figures below are the engine's findings for this view; confidence and triggered flags stay visible beside each result.
- Assets matching
- 2
of 2 in the filtered set
- Latest scan ledger
- 64,489,229
- Methodology
- 1.0.8-draft
Thresholds are served, never hardcoded here
- Engine
- ok
Monitored assets
Start with the highest-risk bands, then open an asset for the depth, collateral, flags, and provenance behind its result.
These bands come from thresholds that were chosen, not calibrated
The thresholds were chosen based on the magnitude of the Blend incident of February 2026 and on conservative judgement, not calibrated against a set of incidents. Every flag is reported separately so that consumers can apply their own thresholds.
Triggered flags are checks that fired. The list response does not include checks that could not be evaluated, so a zero is not a clean bill of health; open an asset for that detail.
- Lowpartial
- Depth, 5% buy
- 440,436.33 USDC (shortened; full value 440436.3387999884991008355054939035 USDC)
- Max safe collateral
- 186,713.39 USDC (shortened; full value 186713.394607924968696355742662452128099170599951736875 USDC)
- Triggered flags
- 0
- Lowpartial
- Depth, 5% buy
- 401,740.58 USDC (shortened; full value 401740.5803058839748430570299197746 USDC)
- Max safe collateral
- 100,088.57 USDC (shortened; full value 100088.57995877820693521709918 USDC)
- Triggered flags
- 0
A band marked partial is a floor. At least one high-severity check could not be evaluated, so the real band can only be worse than the one shown, never better.
Figures are denominated in each row's quote asset.