Skip to content
Keel
Ledger
64,490,679
Methodology
1.0.8-draft
Age
5s

What depth stands behind this price?

yUSDC against USDC · GDGTVW…ZNTTFF

How much can this asset safely back?

The ceiling is the lower of two independent limits. Which one binds is the part a lender acts on, so both are shown.
  1. Low — this asset
  2. Medium
  3. High
  4. Critical

Lowpartial confidence

A band marked partial is a floor. At least one high-severity check could not be evaluated, so the real band can only be worse than the one shown, never better.

100,061.22 USDC (shortened; full value 100061.222282248420463005226195 USDC)

Limited by manipulation cost

Liquidation term
450,781.21 USDC (shortened; full value 450781.2138793389942969927260483964847385023829171051935 USDC)

Sell-side depth at the liquidation delta, times the haircut.

Manipulation termbinds
100,061.22 USDC (shortened; full value 100061.222282248420463005226195 USDC)

Order-book-only manipulation cost at the critical delta, times the safety margin.

These bands come from thresholds that were chosen, not calibrated

The thresholds were chosen based on the magnitude of the Blend incident of February 2026 and on conservative judgement, not calibrated against a set of incidents. Every flag is reported separately so that consumers can apply their own thresholds.

Every threshold, as the engine serves it

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → maxSafeCollateral, maxSafeCollateralLiquidation, maxSafeCollateralManipulation
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What this computation could not do

  • maxReachablePrice and costToMaxReachablePrice are null because an active pool is present: under a constant product curve the price tends to infinity as the base reserve tends to zero, so every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning

Served by the engine with this response and shown as written.

Where does the price come from?

Two venues can disagree. Both readings are shown, not only the one that won.
Mid price
0.99873986 USDC (shortened; full value 0.9987398677931763 USDC)

Source: order book mid

Spread
0.1445 % (shortened; full value 0.14452856646615005547392955 %)

Undefined unless the price came from a two-sided book

Pool spot price
0.99974271 USDC (shortened; full value 0.9997427101747521 USDC)

Reported whenever an active pool exists, whichever source won

Divergence between the two
0.1003 % (shortened; full value 0.10031004691202060243182557 %)

Null means there is no pool to diverge from, not that the sources agree

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → midPrice, priceSource, spreadPct, poolSpotPrice, priceDivergencePct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What volume can it absorb before the price moves?

Three rungs at 2, 5 and 10 per cent, in each direction. The buy side matters for oracle manipulation and the sell side for liquidation.
  • SDEX
  • AMM
  • Sell side, composition not reported

2% from mid

Buy side
400,778.19 USDC (shortened; full value 400778.1970883313058941603228753943 USDC)
Sell side
899,208.98 USDC (shortened; full value 899208.987128896971183749508795369009364449653443221951 USDC)

5% from mid

Buy side
401,631.30 USDC (shortened; full value 401631.307296388311658328203816174 USDC)
Sell side
900,080.44 USDC (shortened; full value 900080.447981816831701373318716647194177614568734328766 USDC)

10% from mid

Buy side
403,015.35 USDC (shortened; full value 403015.3530826566200103252206181666 USDC)
Sell side
901,562.42 USDC (shortened; full value 901562.427758677988593985452096792969477004765834210387 USDC)

Bars share one scale. The venue split decomposes the buy side; the sell side is drawn as an outline because its composition is not reported.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → depth[]
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What would it cost to move the price?

Read cost together with reachability: a figure on an unreachable rung says how far the book goes, not what the move costs.
Cost to move the price by each delta, through all venues and through the order book alone, with whether the target is reachable at all.
MoveTarget priceCost, all venuesCost, order book only
0.5%1.498109 USDC (shortened; full value 1.49810980168976445 USDC)413,105.51 USDC (shortened; full value 413105.5100943259255681974765524973 USDC)400,244.88 USDC (shortened; full value 400244.88912899368185202090478 USDC)
1%1.997479 USDC (shortened; full value 1.9974797355863526 USDC)423,971.78 USDC (shortened; full value 423971.782991677068685457118634706 USDC)400,244.88 USDC (shortened; full value 400244.88912899368185202090478 USDC)
10%10.986138 USDC (shortened; full value 10.9861385457249393 USDC)533,478.62 USDC (shortened; full value 533478.6293049623511436222964081611 USDC)400,646.00 USDC (shortened; full value 400646.00689603368185202090478 USDC)
100%100.872726 USDC (shortened; full value 100.8727266471108063 USDC)919,639.21 USDC (shortened; full value 919639.2167581989971433406086625849 USDC)400,646.00 USDC (shortened; full value 400646.00689603368185202090478 USDC)

Reachability on the all-venues ladder is unconditionally true whenever an active pool exists, because a constant product curve has no upper price bound. The order-book-only column is the one that answers whether a target is attainable, and it is the one Keel itself uses.

How far the book actually goes

Furthest price the book reaches
not computed

Null by structure, not by failure: an active pool means every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning

Cost to walk it that far
not computed

Null for the same reason as the price above

Against genuine volume

Not reported for this asset. Without it there is no comparison between the cost of an attack and the genuine trading it would have to hide inside.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → manipulationCostCombined[], manipulationCostOrderbookOnly[], oracleResistance
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Which checks fired, and which could not run?

An unevaluated check is not a check that came back clear. The two never share a treatment.

Triggered(0)

Nothing triggered.

Could not be evaluated(6)

  • MANIPULATION_RATIO_LOW
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_30D
  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREME
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_7D
  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH
  • WASH_TRADE_SUSPECTED

Nothing triggered, but 6 checks could not run. This is not a clean result.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → flags[], unevaluatedFlags[], bandConfidence
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Who holds it, and is it genuinely traded?

Concentration and wash trading bound how much of the depth above is real.
Largest holder
not computed
Top ten holders
not computed
Concentration index
not computed

Herfindahl–Hirschman, over the holder distribution

Volume excluded as not genuine
not computed

Of 30 day volume. A high share indicates suspected wash trading

Volume to supply, 30 day
not computed
Last genuine trade
not computed

No genuine trade was found in the window

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → holderTop1Pct, holderTop10Pct, holderHhi, volumeToSupply, lastGenuineTrade, tradesExcludedPct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

How has this moved over time?

A single reading cannot separate a thin asset from one that just got thin. This is a stored series, not the historical replay that health reports as unavailable — those are different endpoints.

No readings were stored in this range from this source

The engine accepted the request and returned nothing for Offers implied. The series is as old as the deployment, and the reconstruction sources are not populated in production, so a window can reach back further than anything that was recorded. It is not empty because the figures were zero.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/history → points[], gaps[], dataSource
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What was this computed from?

Ledger
64,490,679

Closed at 2026-09-18T13:46:13Z

Computed at
2026-09-18T13:46:18.623413Z
Data source
horizon
Methodology
1.0.8-draft

The version that produced these figures, not the one this page was built against