eBTC against USDC — what depth stands behind this price?
Risk band
Critical
partial confidence
A floor: the real band can only be worse.
- Max safe collateral
- 0 USDCLimited by manipulation cost
- Depth within 5%
- buy0.0021 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0021622979344160734182270469 USDC)sell0.0022 USDC (shortened; full value 0.002203783228817588728384983818010743891369219588 USDC)
- Cost to move +50%
- 0 USDCReachable at no cost: nothing stands in the way
- Checks
- 5 triggered5 not evaluated
History
Every stored reading from this source, whenever it was taken
A reconstruction is written where a replay ran rather than on the scan's cadence, so there is no window to choose: the engine returns the readings it holds and the axis below is labelled from them.
No readings were stored in this range from this source
The engine holds no stored reading for Offers implied on this asset. A reconstruction exists only where keel replay has been run, and it has been run on one pair.
Checks
Triggered5
- Cheap to move the price
- Cheap next to real trading
- One holder owns most of it
- Thin depth at 5%
- Supply is concentrated
Not evaluated5
- Price sources disagree
- Extreme spread
- No genuine trade in 30 days
- No genuine trade in 7 days
- Volume may be wash traded
Evidence
The figures behind the verdict, as the engine served them.
Concentration and wash trading bound how much of the depth is real.
- Largest holder
- 63.3733 % (shortened; full value 63.37337402372035292530322089 %)
- Top ten holders
- 90.7787 % (shortened; full value 90.77879068685182057559696835 %)
- Concentration index
- 4,124.64 (shortened; full value 4124.6466392387377987845555576177090529424113164615126517)
Herfindahl–Hirschman, over the holder distribution
- Volume excluded as not genuine
- not computed
the newest trade reading is anchored more than 48h0m0s ago, so it was not used
- Volume to supply, 30 day
- not computed
the newest trade reading is anchored more than 48h0m0s ago, so it was not used
- Last genuine trade
- not computed
the newest trade reading is anchored more than 48h0m0s ago, so it was not used