Skip to content
Keel
Ledger
64,490,137
Methodology
1.0.8-draft
Age
9s

What depth stands behind this price?

XAG against USDC · GB4I3O…YCLXAG

How much can this asset safely back?

The ceiling is the lower of two independent limits. Which one binds is the part a lender acts on, so both are shown.
  1. Low
  2. Medium
  3. High
  4. Critical — this asset

Criticalpartial confidence

A band marked partial is a floor. At least one high-severity check could not be evaluated, so the real band can only be worse than the one shown, never better.

0 USDC

Limited by manipulation cost

Liquidation term
18.49 USDC (shortened; full value 18.491125167695211554811215537182337841175259251182 USDC)

Sell-side depth at the liquidation delta, times the haircut.

Manipulation termbinds
0 USDC

Order-book-only manipulation cost at the critical delta, times the safety margin.

These bands come from thresholds that were chosen, not calibrated

The thresholds were chosen based on the magnitude of the Blend incident of February 2026 and on conservative judgement, not calibrated against a set of incidents. Every flag is reported separately so that consumers can apply their own thresholds.

Every threshold, as the engine serves it

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → maxSafeCollateral, maxSafeCollateralLiquidation, maxSafeCollateralManipulation
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What this computation could not do

  • maxReachablePrice and costToMaxReachablePrice are null because an active pool is present: under a constant product curve the price tends to infinity as the base reserve tends to zero, so every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning

Served by the engine with this response and shown as written.

Where does the price come from?

Two venues can disagree. Both readings are shown, not only the one that won.
Mid price
0.00014518 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0001451858784858 USDC)

Source: AMM pool spot

Spread
68,877,118.7962 % (shortened; full value 68877118.79621994426204696766373919 %)

Undefined unless the price came from a two-sided book

Pool spot price
0.00014518 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0001451858784858 USDC)

Reported whenever an active pool exists, whichever source won

Divergence between the two
34,438,562.7139 % (shortened; full value 34438562.71394314021069199640508995 %)

PRICE_SOURCE_CONFLICT is triggered: the two sources disagree past the threshold and the pool was taken

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → midPrice, priceSource, spreadPct, poolSpotPrice, priceDivergencePct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What volume can it absorb before the price moves?

Three rungs at 2, 5 and 10 per cent, in each direction. The buy side matters for oracle manipulation and the sell side for liquidation.
  • SDEX
  • AMM
  • Sell side, composition not reported

2% from mid

Buy side
7.21 USDC (shortened; full value 7.2142122259954867500014788283 USDC)
Sell side
7.24 USDC (shortened; full value 7.2430676841364814522512235584458491407334285035 USDC)

5% from mid

Buy side
17.90 USDC (shortened; full value 17.9041891219707365058082521133 USDC)
Sell side
18.24 USDC (shortened; full value 18.247694409171475205847127750330796447584889941621 USDC)

10% from mid

Buy side
35.38 USDC (shortened; full value 35.3869260161322001195915968919 USDC)
Sell side
36.98 USDC (shortened; full value 36.982250335390423109622431074364675682350518502364 USDC)

Bars share one scale. The venue split decomposes the buy side; the sell side is drawn as an outline because its composition is not reported.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → depth[]
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What would it cost to move the price?

Read cost together with reachability: a figure on an unreachable rung says how far the book goes, not what the move costs.
Cost to move the price by each delta, through all venues and through the order book alone, with whether the target is reachable at all.
MoveTarget priceCost, all venuesCost, order book only
0.5%0.000217 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0002177788177287 USDC)162.94 USDC (shortened; full value 162.9423851330072171165893837138 USDC)free to reach
1%0.000290 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0002903717569716 USDC)300.30 USDC (shortened; full value 300.3091700807444809679845905988 USDC)free to reach
10%0.001597 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0015970446633438 USDC)1,679.57 USDC (shortened; full value 1679.577231113130117628270842899 USDC)free to reach
100%0.014663 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0146637737270658 USDC)6,561.25 USDC (shortened; full value 6561.2545894014086755803131621557 USDC)free to reach

Reachability on the all-venues ladder is unconditionally true whenever an active pool exists, because a constant product curve has no upper price bound. The order-book-only column is the one that answers whether a target is attainable, and it is the one Keel itself uses.

How far the book actually goes

Furthest price the book reaches
not computed

Null by structure, not by failure: an active pool means every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning

Cost to walk it that far
not computed

Null for the same reason as the price above

Against genuine volume

Not reported for this asset. Without it there is no comparison between the cost of an attack and the genuine trading it would have to hide inside.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → manipulationCostCombined[], manipulationCostOrderbookOnly[], oracleResistance
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Which checks fired, and which could not run?

An unevaluated check is not a check that came back clear. The two never share a treatment.

Triggered(7)

  • MANIPULATION_CHEAP
  • MANIPULATION_RATIO_LOW
  • PRICE_SOURCE_CONFLICT
  • SPREAD_EXTREME
  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREME
  • THIN_DEPTH_5PCT
  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH

Could not be evaluated(3)

  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_30D
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_7D
  • WASH_TRADE_SUSPECTED
Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → flags[], unevaluatedFlags[], bandConfidence
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Who holds it, and is it genuinely traded?

Concentration and wash trading bound how much of the depth above is real.
Largest holder
89.0741 % (shortened; full value 89.07413303082708356530243253 %)
Top ten holders
98.5935 % (shortened; full value 98.59350391178447912611475057 %)
Concentration index
7,981.70 (shortened; full value 7981.7021001826631229899811217928966564672062866967130639)

Herfindahl–Hirschman, over the holder distribution

Volume excluded as not genuine
not computed

Of 30 day volume. A high share indicates suspected wash trading

Volume to supply, 30 day
not computed
Last genuine trade
not computed

No genuine trade was found in the window

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → holderTop1Pct, holderTop10Pct, holderHhi, volumeToSupply, lastGenuineTrade, tradesExcludedPct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

How has this moved over time?

A single reading cannot separate a thin asset from one that just got thin. This is a stored series, not the historical replay that health reports as unavailable — those are different endpoints.

No readings were stored in this range from this source

The engine accepted the request and returned nothing for Hubble. The series is as old as the deployment, and the reconstruction sources are not populated in production, so a window can reach back further than anything that was recorded. It is not empty because the figures were zero.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/history → points[], gaps[], dataSource
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What was this computed from?

Ledger
64,490,137

Closed at 2026-09-18T13:01:03Z

Computed at
2026-09-18T13:01:12.725666Z
Data source
horizon
Methodology
1.0.8-draft

The version that produced these figures, not the one this page was built against