Skip to content
Keel
Ledger
64,490,137
Methodology
1.0.8-draft
Age
8s

What depth stands behind this price?

X against USDC · GB3JS5…JP4LEA

How much can this asset safely back?

The ceiling is the lower of two independent limits. Which one binds is the part a lender acts on, so both are shown.
  1. Low
  2. Medium
  3. High
  4. Critical — this asset

Criticalpartial confidence

A band marked partial is a floor. At least one high-severity check could not be evaluated, so the real band can only be worse than the one shown, never better.

0 USDC

Limited by manipulation cost

Liquidation term
9.13 USDC (shortened; full value 9.131293518765379015994079616796266913536138902462 USDC)

Sell-side depth at the liquidation delta, times the haircut.

Manipulation termbinds
0 USDC

Order-book-only manipulation cost at the critical delta, times the safety margin.

These bands come from thresholds that were chosen, not calibrated

The thresholds were chosen based on the magnitude of the Blend incident of February 2026 and on conservative judgement, not calibrated against a set of incidents. Every flag is reported separately so that consumers can apply their own thresholds.

Every threshold, as the engine serves it

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → maxSafeCollateral, maxSafeCollateralLiquidation, maxSafeCollateralManipulation
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What this computation could not do

  • maxReachablePrice and costToMaxReachablePrice are null because an active pool is present: under a constant product curve the price tends to infinity as the base reserve tends to zero, so every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning

Served by the engine with this response and shown as written.

Where does the price come from?

Two venues can disagree. Both readings are shown, not only the one that won.
Mid price
0.00480482 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0048048273730539 USDC)

Source: AMM pool spot

Spread
not computed

Undefined unless the price came from a two-sided book

Pool spot price
0.00480482 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0048048273730539 USDC)

Reported whenever an active pool exists, whichever source won

Divergence between the two
not computed

Null means there is no pool to diverge from, not that the sources agree

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → midPrice, priceSource, spreadPct, poolSpotPrice, priceDivergencePct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What volume can it absorb before the price moves?

Three rungs at 2, 5 and 10 per cent, in each direction. The buy side matters for oracle manipulation and the sell side for liquidation.
  • SDEX
  • AMM
  • Sell side, composition not reported

2% from mid

Buy side
3.56 USDC (shortened; full value 3.5625246664515248058196408779 USDC)
Sell side
3.57 USDC (shortened; full value 3.5767740289482596992739611684409309987819456435 USDC)

5% from mid

Buy side
8.84 USDC (shortened; full value 8.8414525913163398715183843007 USDC)
Sell side
9.01 USDC (shortened; full value 9.011082436422236511817538602004514545770789068461 USDC)

10% from mid

Buy side
17.47 USDC (shortened; full value 17.474783504164272947118818319 USDC)
Sell side
18.26 USDC (shortened; full value 18.262587037530758031988159233592533827072277804924 USDC)

Bars share one scale. The venue split decomposes the buy side; the sell side is drawn as an outline because its composition is not reported.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → depth[]
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What would it cost to move the price?

Read cost together with reachability: a figure on an unreachable rung says how far the book goes, not what the move costs.
Cost to move the price by each delta, through all venues and through the order book alone, with whether the target is reachable at all.
MoveTarget priceCost, all venuesCost, order book only
0.5%0.007207 USDC (shortened; full value 0.00720724105958085 USDC)80.46 USDC (shortened; full value 80.4642624949505589819923939699 USDC)free to reach
1%0.009609 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0096096547461078 USDC)148.29 USDC (shortened; full value 148.2987736511465048544775159862 USDC)free to reach
10%0.052853 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0528531011035929 USDC)846.11 USDC (shortened; full value 846.117315334826112557983064721 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 16.70 USDC (shortened; full value 16.7079318002 USDC)
100%0.485287 USDC (shortened; full value 0.4852875646784439 USDC)3,256.78 USDC (shortened; full value 3256.7888422817782115415681914675 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 16.70 USDC (shortened; full value 16.7079318002 USDC)

Reachability on the all-venues ladder is unconditionally true whenever an active pool exists, because a constant product curve has no upper price bound. The order-book-only column is the one that answers whether a target is attainable, and it is the one Keel itself uses.

How far the book actually goes

Furthest price the book reaches
not computed

Null by structure, not by failure: an active pool means every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning

Cost to walk it that far
not computed

Null for the same reason as the price above

Against genuine volume

Not reported for this asset. Without it there is no comparison between the cost of an attack and the genuine trading it would have to hide inside.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → manipulationCostCombined[], manipulationCostOrderbookOnly[], oracleResistance
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Which checks fired, and which could not run?

An unevaluated check is not a check that came back clear. The two never share a treatment.

Triggered(5)

  • MANIPULATION_CHEAP
  • MANIPULATION_RATIO_LOW
  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREME
  • THIN_DEPTH_5PCT
  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH

Could not be evaluated(5)

  • PRICE_SOURCE_CONFLICT
  • SPREAD_EXTREME
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_30D
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_7D
  • WASH_TRADE_SUSPECTED
Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → flags[], unevaluatedFlags[], bandConfidence
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Who holds it, and is it genuinely traded?

Concentration and wash trading bound how much of the depth above is real.
Largest holder
99.9581 % (shortened; full value 99.95816873114532202705276864 %)
Top ten holders
99.9999 % (shortened; full value 99.99999915243246215047256737 %)
Concentration index
9,991.63 (shortened; full value 9991.6371087471110268811060287461973876848566186253838371)

Herfindahl–Hirschman, over the holder distribution

Volume excluded as not genuine
not computed

Of 30 day volume. A high share indicates suspected wash trading

Volume to supply, 30 day
not computed
Last genuine trade
not computed

No genuine trade was found in the window

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → holderTop1Pct, holderTop10Pct, holderHhi, volumeToSupply, lastGenuineTrade, tradesExcludedPct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

How has this moved over time?

A single reading cannot separate a thin asset from one that just got thin. This is a stored series, not the historical replay that health reports as unavailable — those are different endpoints.

8 readings from horizon, with no gaps reported. One source per chart.

Band at each reading

Critical
8 of 8

Which checks were firing

Whether a finding has been there all along or started recently. Only checks that fired at least once appear.

MANIPULATION_CHEAPthroughout
THIN_DEPTH_5PCTthroughout
MANIPULATION_RATIO_LOW7 of 8
HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREME7 of 8
HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH7 of 8

Price

Lowest
0.00466334 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0046633493877468 USDC)
Highest
0.00496091 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0049609143693335 USDC)
2026-09-11T23:48:28Z2026-09-18T12:46:03Z
Mid price
0.00480482 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0048048273730539 USDC)

Buy-side depth

What an order can absorb before the price moves against a buyer. The rungs are nested, so one scale covers all three, and the lines darken as the rung widens.

Lowest
3.50 USDC (shortened; full value 3.508443814291303599554726648 USDC)
Highest
17.75 USDC (shortened; full value 17.751835313610893693122222372 USDC)
2026-09-11T23:48:28Z2026-09-18T12:46:03ZOne scale across every line on this chart
2% from mid
3.56 USDC (shortened; full value 3.5625246664515248058196408779 USDC)
5% from mid
8.84 USDC (shortened; full value 8.8414525913163398715183843007 USDC)
10% from mid
17.47 USDC (shortened; full value 17.474783504164272947118818319 USDC)

Cost to move the price by half

The series carries one manipulation rung, at the half per cent delta the engine treats as critical. A reading the engine could not produce breaks the line rather than sitting at zero.

Lowest
0 USDC
Highest
0 USDC
2026-09-11T23:48:28Z2026-09-18T12:46:03Z
Manipulation cost, 0.5%
0 USDC

Collateral ceiling

Lowest
0 USDC
Highest
0 USDC
2026-09-11T23:48:28Z2026-09-18T12:46:03Z
Max safe collateral
0 USDC
Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/history → points[], gaps[], dataSource
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What was this computed from?

Ledger
64,490,137

Closed at 2026-09-18T13:01:03Z

Computed at
2026-09-18T13:01:11.951975Z
Data source
horizon
Methodology
1.0.8-draft

The version that produced these figures, not the one this page was built against