What depth stands behind this price?
X against USDC · GB3JS5…JP4LEA
How much can this asset safely back?
- Low
- Medium
- High
- Critical — this asset
Criticalpartial confidence
A band marked partial is a floor. At least one high-severity check could not be evaluated, so the real band can only be worse than the one shown, never better.
0 USDC
Limited by manipulation cost
- Liquidation term
- 9.13 USDC (shortened; full value 9.131293518765379015994079616796266913536138902462 USDC)
Sell-side depth at the liquidation delta, times the haircut.
- Manipulation termbinds
- 0 USDC
Order-book-only manipulation cost at the critical delta, times the safety margin.
These bands come from thresholds that were chosen, not calibrated
The thresholds were chosen based on the magnitude of the Blend incident of February 2026 and on conservative judgement, not calibrated against a set of incidents. Every flag is reported separately so that consumers can apply their own thresholds.
Where this number comes from
- Source
- GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → maxSafeCollateral, maxSafeCollateralLiquidation, maxSafeCollateralManipulation
- What it is
- Awaiting methodology copy.
- What it does not account for
- Awaiting methodology copy.
What this computation could not do
- maxReachablePrice and costToMaxReachablePrice are null because an active pool is present: under a constant product curve the price tends to infinity as the base reserve tends to zero, so every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning
Served by the engine with this response and shown as written.
Where does the price come from?
- Mid price
- 0.00480482 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0048048273730539 USDC)
Source: AMM pool spot
- Spread
- not computed
Undefined unless the price came from a two-sided book
- Pool spot price
- 0.00480482 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0048048273730539 USDC)
Reported whenever an active pool exists, whichever source won
- Divergence between the two
- not computed
Null means there is no pool to diverge from, not that the sources agree
Where this number comes from
- Source
- GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → midPrice, priceSource, spreadPct, poolSpotPrice, priceDivergencePct
- What it is
- Awaiting methodology copy.
- What it does not account for
- Awaiting methodology copy.
What volume can it absorb before the price moves?
- SDEX
- AMM
- Sell side, composition not reported
2% from mid
5% from mid
10% from mid
Bars share one scale. The venue split decomposes the buy side; the sell side is drawn as an outline because its composition is not reported.
Where this number comes from
- Source
- GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → depth[]
- What it is
- Awaiting methodology copy.
- What it does not account for
- Awaiting methodology copy.
What would it cost to move the price?
| Move | Target price | Cost, all venues | Cost, order book only |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5% | 0.007207 USDC (shortened; full value 0.00720724105958085 USDC) | 80.46 USDC (shortened; full value 80.4642624949505589819923939699 USDC) | free to reach |
| 1% | 0.009609 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0096096547461078 USDC) | 148.29 USDC (shortened; full value 148.2987736511465048544775159862 USDC) | free to reach |
| 10% | 0.052853 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0528531011035929 USDC) | 846.11 USDC (shortened; full value 846.117315334826112557983064721 USDC) | unreachablebook ends at 16.70 USDC (shortened; full value 16.7079318002 USDC) |
| 100% | 0.485287 USDC (shortened; full value 0.4852875646784439 USDC) | 3,256.78 USDC (shortened; full value 3256.7888422817782115415681914675 USDC) | unreachablebook ends at 16.70 USDC (shortened; full value 16.7079318002 USDC) |
Reachability on the all-venues ladder is unconditionally true whenever an active pool exists, because a constant product curve has no upper price bound. The order-book-only column is the one that answers whether a target is attainable, and it is the one Keel itself uses.
How far the book actually goes
- Furthest price the book reaches
- not computed
Null by structure, not by failure: an active pool means every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning
- Cost to walk it that far
- not computed
Null for the same reason as the price above
Against genuine volume
Not reported for this asset. Without it there is no comparison between the cost of an attack and the genuine trading it would have to hide inside.
Where this number comes from
- Source
- GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → manipulationCostCombined[], manipulationCostOrderbookOnly[], oracleResistance
- What it is
- Awaiting methodology copy.
- What it does not account for
- Awaiting methodology copy.
Which checks fired, and which could not run?
Triggered(5)
- MANIPULATION_CHEAP
- MANIPULATION_RATIO_LOW
- HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREME
- THIN_DEPTH_5PCT
- HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH
Could not be evaluated(5)
- PRICE_SOURCE_CONFLICT
- SPREAD_EXTREME
- NO_GENUINE_TRADE_30D
- NO_GENUINE_TRADE_7D
- WASH_TRADE_SUSPECTED
Where this number comes from
- Source
- GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → flags[], unevaluatedFlags[], bandConfidence
- What it is
- Awaiting methodology copy.
- What it does not account for
- Awaiting methodology copy.
Who holds it, and is it genuinely traded?
- Largest holder
- 99.9581 % (shortened; full value 99.95816873114532202705276864 %)
- Top ten holders
- 99.9999 % (shortened; full value 99.99999915243246215047256737 %)
- Concentration index
- 9,991.63 (shortened; full value 9991.6371087471110268811060287461973876848566186253838371)
Herfindahl–Hirschman, over the holder distribution
- Volume excluded as not genuine
- not computed
Of 30 day volume. A high share indicates suspected wash trading
- Volume to supply, 30 day
- not computed
- Last genuine trade
- not computed
No genuine trade was found in the window
Where this number comes from
- Source
- GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → holderTop1Pct, holderTop10Pct, holderHhi, volumeToSupply, lastGenuineTrade, tradesExcludedPct
- What it is
- Awaiting methodology copy.
- What it does not account for
- Awaiting methodology copy.
How has this moved over time?
No readings were stored in this range from this source
The engine accepted the request and returned nothing for Offers implied. The series is as old as the deployment, and the reconstruction sources are not populated in production, so a window can reach back further than anything that was recorded. It is not empty because the figures were zero.
Where this number comes from
- Source
- GET /asset/{assetId}/history → points[], gaps[], dataSource
- What it is
- Awaiting methodology copy.
- What it does not account for
- Awaiting methodology copy.
What was this computed from?
- Ledger
- 64,490,137
Closed at 2026-09-18T13:01:03Z
- Computed at
- 2026-09-18T13:01:11.951975Z
- Data source
- horizon
- Methodology
- 1.0.8-draft
The version that produced these figures, not the one this page was built against