Skip to content
Keel
Ledger
64,490,313
Methodology
1.0.8-draft
Age
27s

What depth stands behind this price?

VAQM against USDC · GC2BHM…5QBVCD

How much can this asset safely back?

The ceiling is the lower of two independent limits. Which one binds is the part a lender acts on, so both are shown.
  1. Low
  2. Medium
  3. High
  4. Critical — this asset

Criticalpartial confidence

A band marked partial is a floor. At least one high-severity check could not be evaluated, so the real band can only be worse than the one shown, never better.

10.03 USDC (shortened; full value 10.03028679054856893152690456415064063928689127635 USDC)

Limited by liquidation depth

Liquidation termbinds
10.03 USDC (shortened; full value 10.03028679054856893152690456415064063928689127635 USDC)

Sell-side depth at the liquidation delta, times the haircut.

Manipulation term
219.98 USDC (shortened; full value 219.9809343753 USDC)

Order-book-only manipulation cost at the critical delta, times the safety margin.

These bands come from thresholds that were chosen, not calibrated

The thresholds were chosen based on the magnitude of the Blend incident of February 2026 and on conservative judgement, not calibrated against a set of incidents. Every flag is reported separately so that consumers can apply their own thresholds.

Every threshold, as the engine serves it

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → maxSafeCollateral, maxSafeCollateralLiquidation, maxSafeCollateralManipulation
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What this computation could not do

  • maxReachablePrice and costToMaxReachablePrice are null because an active pool is present: under a constant product curve the price tends to infinity as the base reserve tends to zero, so every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning

Served by the engine with this response and shown as written.

Where does the price come from?

Two venues can disagree. Both readings are shown, not only the one that won.
Mid price
0.2848 USDC

Source: order book mid

Spread
3.5112 % (shortened; full value 3.51123595505617977528089888 %)

Undefined unless the price came from a two-sided book

Pool spot price
0.28721355 USDC (shortened; full value 0.2872135583547666 USDC)

Reported whenever an active pool exists, whichever source won

Divergence between the two
0.8403 % (shortened; full value 0.84033580050749876228223317 %)

Null means there is no pool to diverge from, not that the sources agree

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → midPrice, priceSource, spreadPct, poolSpotPrice, priceDivergencePct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What volume can it absorb before the price moves?

Three rungs at 2, 5 and 10 per cent, in each direction. The buy side matters for oracle manipulation and the sell side for liquidation.
  • SDEX
  • AMM
  • Sell side, composition not reported

2% from mid

Buy side
882.00 USDC (shortened; full value 882.00279498982709565995003921 USDC)
Sell side
5.15 USDC (shortened; full value 5.15693714444467423735091551608641524483863764846 USDC)

5% from mid

Buy side
887.36 USDC (shortened; full value 887.360021213632277675235833876 USDC)
Sell side
10.67 USDC (shortened; full value 10.67184849067414527023760298332747111929774582753 USDC)

10% from mid

Buy side
896.12 USDC (shortened; full value 896.121403718448591185576762938 USDC)
Sell side
20.06 USDC (shortened; full value 20.0605735810971378630538091283012812785737825527 USDC)

Bars share one scale. The venue split decomposes the buy side; the sell side is drawn as an outline because its composition is not reported.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → depth[]
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What would it cost to move the price?

Read cost together with reachability: a figure on an unreachable rung says how far the book goes, not what the move costs.
Cost to move the price by each delta, through all venues and through the order book alone, with whether the target is reachable at all.
MoveTarget priceCost, all venuesCost, order book only
0.5%0.4272 USDC960.04 USDC (shortened; full value 960.045157457122223676942751083 USDC)879.92 USDC (shortened; full value 879.9237375012 USDC)
1%0.5696 USDC1,028.88 USDC (shortened; full value 1028.8858060163245767012587906867 USDC)879.92 USDC (shortened; full value 879.9237375012 USDC)
10%3.1328 USDC1,720.09 USDC (shortened; full value 1720.0988084505564338630016211676 USDC)879.92 USDC (shortened; full value 879.9237375012 USDC)
100%28.7648 USDC4,166.52 USDC (shortened; full value 4166.5259817238896494421381765199 USDC)879.92 USDC (shortened; full value 879.9237375012 USDC)

Reachability on the all-venues ladder is unconditionally true whenever an active pool exists, because a constant product curve has no upper price bound. The order-book-only column is the one that answers whether a target is attainable, and it is the one Keel itself uses.

How far the book actually goes

Furthest price the book reaches
not computed

Null by structure, not by failure: an active pool means every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning

Cost to walk it that far
not computed

Null for the same reason as the price above

Against genuine volume

Not reported for this asset. Without it there is no comparison between the cost of an attack and the genuine trading it would have to hide inside.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → manipulationCostCombined[], manipulationCostOrderbookOnly[], oracleResistance
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Which checks fired, and which could not run?

An unevaluated check is not a check that came back clear. The two never share a treatment.

Triggered(5)

  • MANIPULATION_CHEAP
  • MANIPULATION_RATIO_LOW
  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREME
  • THIN_DEPTH_5PCT
  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH

Could not be evaluated(3)

  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_30D
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_7D
  • WASH_TRADE_SUSPECTED
Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → flags[], unevaluatedFlags[], bandConfidence
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Who holds it, and is it genuinely traded?

Concentration and wash trading bound how much of the depth above is real.
Largest holder
91.9649 % (shortened; full value 91.96498287335784592326426971 %)
Top ten holders
99.9999 % (shortened; full value 99.99990664317014948709639926 %)
Concentration index
8,521.60 (shortened; full value 8521.6097912732167768221161429288749841474207783365589926)

Herfindahl–Hirschman, over the holder distribution

Volume excluded as not genuine
not computed

Of 30 day volume. A high share indicates suspected wash trading

Volume to supply, 30 day
not computed
Last genuine trade
not computed

No genuine trade was found in the window

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → holderTop1Pct, holderTop10Pct, holderHhi, volumeToSupply, lastGenuineTrade, tradesExcludedPct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

How has this moved over time?

A single reading cannot separate a thin asset from one that just got thin. This is a stored series, not the historical replay that health reports as unavailable — those are different endpoints.

2 readings from horizon, with no gaps reported. One source per chart.

Band at each reading

Critical
2 of 2

Which checks were firing

Whether a finding has been there all along or started recently. Only checks that fired at least once appear.

MANIPULATION_CHEAPthroughout
MANIPULATION_RATIO_LOWthroughout
HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREMEthroughout
THIN_DEPTH_5PCTthroughout
HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGHthroughout

Price

Lowest
0.2848 USDC
Highest
0.2848 USDC
2026-09-17T23:46:03Z2026-09-18T13:01:03Z
Mid price
0.2848 USDC

Buy-side depth

What an order can absorb before the price moves against a buyer. The rungs are nested, so one scale covers all three, and the lines darken as the rung widens.

Lowest
882.00 USDC (shortened; full value 882.00279498982709565995003921 USDC)
Highest
897.61 USDC (shortened; full value 897.6189784426959758898008831629 USDC)
2026-09-17T23:46:03Z2026-09-18T13:01:03ZOne scale across every line on this chart
2% from mid
882.00 USDC (shortened; full value 882.00279498982709565995003921 USDC)
5% from mid
887.36 USDC (shortened; full value 887.360021213632277675235833876 USDC)
10% from mid
896.12 USDC (shortened; full value 896.121403718448591185576762938 USDC)

Cost to move the price by half

The series carries one manipulation rung, at the half per cent delta the engine treats as critical. A reading the engine could not produce breaks the line rather than sitting at zero.

Lowest
879.92 USDC (shortened; full value 879.9237375012 USDC)
Highest
881.24 USDC (shortened; full value 881.24268070944 USDC)
2026-09-17T23:46:03Z2026-09-18T13:01:03Z
Manipulation cost, 0.5%
879.92 USDC (shortened; full value 879.9237375012 USDC)

Collateral ceiling

Lowest
9.94 USDC (shortened; full value 9.9411540598079086557685875082846315993757123705675 USDC)
Highest
10.03 USDC (shortened; full value 10.03028679054856893152690456415064063928689127635 USDC)
2026-09-17T23:46:03Z2026-09-18T13:01:03Z
Max safe collateral
10.03 USDC (shortened; full value 10.03028679054856893152690456415064063928689127635 USDC)
Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/history → points[], gaps[], dataSource
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What was this computed from?

Ledger
64,490,313

Closed at 2026-09-18T13:15:43Z

Computed at
2026-09-18T13:16:10.035002Z
Data source
horizon
Methodology
1.0.8-draft

The version that produced these figures, not the one this page was built against