Skip to content
Keel
Ledger
64,490,136
Methodology
1.0.8-draft
Age
6s

What depth stands behind this price?

TRNPC against USDC · GBOCPM…WDHH7K

How much can this asset safely back?

The ceiling is the lower of two independent limits. Which one binds is the part a lender acts on, so both are shown.
  1. Low
  2. Medium
  3. High — this asset
  4. Critical

Highpartial confidence

A band marked partial is a floor. At least one high-severity check could not be evaluated, so the real band can only be worse than the one shown, never better.

6.41 USDC (shortened; full value 6.414643969751400804590238004645425935811365217846 USDC)

Limited by liquidation depth

Liquidation termbinds
6.41 USDC (shortened; full value 6.414643969751400804590238004645425935811365217846 USDC)

Sell-side depth at the liquidation delta, times the haircut.

Manipulation term
not applicable

Not applied: the critical target is not reachable through the order book.

These bands come from thresholds that were chosen, not calibrated

The thresholds were chosen based on the magnitude of the Blend incident of February 2026 and on conservative judgement, not calibrated against a set of incidents. Every flag is reported separately so that consumers can apply their own thresholds.

Every threshold, as the engine serves it

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → maxSafeCollateral, maxSafeCollateralLiquidation, maxSafeCollateralManipulation
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What this computation could not do

  • maxReachablePrice and costToMaxReachablePrice are null because an active pool is present: under a constant product curve the price tends to infinity as the base reserve tends to zero, so every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning
  • manipulation to delta 0.5 is unreachable through the order book; the manipulation term was not applied

Served by the engine with this response and shown as written.

Where does the price come from?

Two venues can disagree. Both readings are shown, not only the one that won.
Mid price
0.00027661 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0002766183748037 USDC)

Source: AMM pool spot

Spread
not computed

Undefined unless the price came from a two-sided book

Pool spot price
0.00027661 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0002766183748037 USDC)

Reported whenever an active pool exists, whichever source won

Divergence between the two
not computed

Null means there is no pool to diverge from, not that the sources agree

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → midPrice, priceSource, spreadPct, poolSpotPrice, priceDivergencePct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What volume can it absorb before the price moves?

Three rungs at 2, 5 and 10 per cent, in each direction. The buy side matters for oracle manipulation and the sell side for liquidation.
  • SDEX
  • AMM
  • Sell side, composition not reported

2% from mid

Buy side
2.50 USDC (shortened; full value 2.5026385716088233053688933381 USDC)
Sell side
2.51 USDC (shortened; full value 2.5126486087437199230422872885654461126305857855 USDC)

5% from mid

Buy side
6.21 USDC (shortened; full value 6.2110335662935220477024256672 USDC)
Sell side
6.33 USDC (shortened; full value 6.330196865640132642914584075475595130446849316513 USDC)

10% from mid

Buy side
12.27 USDC (shortened; full value 12.275863698537055147646290254 USDC)
Sell side
12.82 USDC (shortened; full value 12.829287939502801609180476009290851871622730435692 USDC)

Bars share one scale. The venue split decomposes the buy side; the sell side is drawn as an outline because its composition is not reported.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → depth[]
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What would it cost to move the price?

Read cost together with reachability: a figure on an unreachable rung says how far the book goes, not what the move costs.
Cost to move the price by each delta, through all venues and through the order book alone, with whether the target is reachable at all.
MoveTarget priceCost, all venuesCost, order book only
0.5%0.000414 USDC (shortened; full value 0.00041492756220555 USDC)56.52 USDC (shortened; full value 56.5253537336204033833716254633 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 0 USDC
1%0.000553 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0005532367496074 USDC)104.17 USDC (shortened; full value 104.1784312559778203746613284637 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 0 USDC
10%0.003042 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0030428021228407 USDC)582.65 USDC (shortened; full value 582.6519418756971999651727542739 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 0 USDC
100%0.027938 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0279384558551737 USDC)2,276.12 USDC (shortened; full value 2276.1250014814369533474096515886 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 0 USDC

Reachability on the all-venues ladder is unconditionally true whenever an active pool exists, because a constant product curve has no upper price bound. The order-book-only column is the one that answers whether a target is attainable, and it is the one Keel itself uses.

How far the book actually goes

Furthest price the book reaches
not computed

Null by structure, not by failure: an active pool means every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning

Cost to walk it that far
not computed

Null for the same reason as the price above

Against genuine volume

Not reported for this asset. Without it there is no comparison between the cost of an attack and the genuine trading it would have to hide inside.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → manipulationCostCombined[], manipulationCostOrderbookOnly[], oracleResistance
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Which checks fired, and which could not run?

An unevaluated check is not a check that came back clear. The two never share a treatment.

Triggered(3)

  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREME
  • THIN_DEPTH_5PCT
  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH

Could not be evaluated(5)

  • PRICE_SOURCE_CONFLICT
  • SPREAD_EXTREME
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_30D
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_7D
  • WASH_TRADE_SUSPECTED
Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → flags[], unevaluatedFlags[], bandConfidence
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Who holds it, and is it genuinely traded?

Concentration and wash trading bound how much of the depth above is real.
Largest holder
58.7145 % (shortened; full value 58.71453558156669087709622538 %)
Top ten holders
98.8129 % (shortened; full value 98.81297213518210681220550138 %)
Concentration index
3,748.35 (shortened; full value 3748.3535962973262798208856094560563358633109665403917832)

Herfindahl–Hirschman, over the holder distribution

Volume excluded as not genuine
not computed

Of 30 day volume. A high share indicates suspected wash trading

Volume to supply, 30 day
not computed
Last genuine trade
not computed

No genuine trade was found in the window

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → holderTop1Pct, holderTop10Pct, holderHhi, volumeToSupply, lastGenuineTrade, tradesExcludedPct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

How has this moved over time?

A single reading cannot separate a thin asset from one that just got thin. This is a stored series, not the historical replay that health reports as unavailable — those are different endpoints.

8 readings from horizon, with no gaps reported. One source per chart.

Band at each reading

Medium
1 of 8
High
7 of 8

Which checks were firing

Whether a finding has been there all along or started recently. Only checks that fired at least once appear.

THIN_DEPTH_5PCTthroughout
HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREME7 of 8
HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH7 of 8

Price

Lowest
0.00026754 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0002675426387468 USDC)
Highest
0.00028219 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0002821974152088 USDC)
2026-09-11T23:48:22Z2026-09-18T12:45:58Z
Mid price
0.00027661 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0002766183748037 USDC)

Buy-side depth

What an order can absorb before the price moves against a buyer. The rungs are nested, so one scale covers all three, and the lines darken as the rung widens.

Lowest
2.46 USDC (shortened; full value 2.4610161090037215276012701221 USDC)
Highest
12.39 USDC (shortened; full value 12.3967017662406557610167548376 USDC)
2026-09-11T23:48:22Z2026-09-18T12:45:58ZOne scale across every line on this chart
2% from mid
2.50 USDC (shortened; full value 2.5026385716088233053688933381 USDC)
5% from mid
6.21 USDC (shortened; full value 6.2110335662935220477024256672 USDC)
10% from mid
12.27 USDC (shortened; full value 12.275863698537055147646290254 USDC)

Cost to move the price by half

The series carries one manipulation rung, at the half per cent delta the engine treats as critical. A reading the engine could not produce breaks the line rather than sitting at zero.

No point in this range carried a value.

Collateral ceiling

Lowest
6.30 USDC (shortened; full value 6.307959256351342223205013129197156939068820176838 USDC)
Highest
6.47 USDC (shortened; full value 6.47778683296221404473205386931150147310965077833 USDC)
2026-09-11T23:48:22Z2026-09-18T12:45:58Z
Max safe collateral
6.41 USDC (shortened; full value 6.414643969751400804590238004645425935811365217846 USDC)
Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/history → points[], gaps[], dataSource
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What was this computed from?

Ledger
64,490,136

Closed at 2026-09-18T13:00:58Z

Computed at
2026-09-18T13:01:04.578844Z
Data source
horizon
Methodology
1.0.8-draft

The version that produced these figures, not the one this page was built against