Skip to content
Keel
Ledger
64,490,134
Methodology
1.0.8-draft
Age
9s

What depth stands behind this price?

SCROOGE against USDC · GD2TQV…SPE6YA

How much can this asset safely back?

The ceiling is the lower of two independent limits. Which one binds is the part a lender acts on, so both are shown.
  1. Low
  2. Medium — this asset
  3. High
  4. Critical

Mediumpartial confidence

A band marked partial is a floor. At least one high-severity check could not be evaluated, so the real band can only be worse than the one shown, never better.

76.22 USDC (shortened; full value 76.2200551765346554652712689608458400162646136980525 USDC)

Limited by liquidation depth

Liquidation termbinds
76.22 USDC (shortened; full value 76.2200551765346554652712689608458400162646136980525 USDC)

Sell-side depth at the liquidation delta, times the haircut.

Manipulation term
not applicable

Not applied: the critical target is not reachable through the order book.

These bands come from thresholds that were chosen, not calibrated

The thresholds were chosen based on the magnitude of the Blend incident of February 2026 and on conservative judgement, not calibrated against a set of incidents. Every flag is reported separately so that consumers can apply their own thresholds.

Every threshold, as the engine serves it

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → maxSafeCollateral, maxSafeCollateralLiquidation, maxSafeCollateralManipulation
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What this computation could not do

  • maxReachablePrice and costToMaxReachablePrice are null because an active pool is present: under a constant product curve the price tends to infinity as the base reserve tends to zero, so every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning
  • manipulation to delta 0.5 is unreachable through the order book; the manipulation term was not applied

Served by the engine with this response and shown as written.

Where does the price come from?

Two venues can disagree. Both readings are shown, not only the one that won.
Mid price
0.01085 USDC

Source: order book mid

Spread
2.7649 % (shortened; full value 2.76497695852534562211981567 %)

Undefined unless the price came from a two-sided book

Pool spot price
0.01097293 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0109729397483648 USDC)

Reported whenever an active pool exists, whichever source won

Divergence between the two
1.1203 % (shortened; full value 1.1203902617174273791087149 %)

Null means there is no pool to diverge from, not that the sources agree

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → midPrice, priceSource, spreadPct, poolSpotPrice, priceDivergencePct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What volume can it absorb before the price moves?

Three rungs at 2, 5 and 10 per cent, in each direction. The buy side matters for oracle manipulation and the sell side for liquidation.
  • SDEX
  • AMM
  • Sell side, composition not reported

2% from mid

Buy side
21.36 USDC (shortened; full value 21.3693111049703893218758363704 USDC)
Sell side
14.78 USDC (shortened; full value 14.783065702456135998173560312502811083630829234537 USDC)

5% from mid

Buy side
77.44 USDC (shortened; full value 77.4432314886944107477289960194 USDC)
Sell side
58.50 USDC (shortened; full value 58.503282888429177175971793397608614821381076671911 USDC)

10% from mid

Buy side
190.97 USDC (shortened; full value 190.9755536211295443571019823727 USDC)
Sell side
152.44 USDC (shortened; full value 152.440110353069310930542537921691680032529227396105 USDC)

Bars share one scale. The venue split decomposes the buy side; the sell side is drawn as an outline because its composition is not reported.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → depth[]
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What would it cost to move the price?

Read cost together with reachability: a figure on an unreachable rung says how far the book goes, not what the move costs.
Cost to move the price by each delta, through all venues and through the order book alone, with whether the target is reachable at all.
MoveTarget priceCost, all venuesCost, order book only
0.5%0.016275 USDC590.64 USDC (shortened; full value 590.6455356498688514082424178809 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 482.11 USDC (shortened; full value 482.11262720541 USDC)
1%0.0217 USDC684.50 USDC (shortened; full value 684.5023111374955013847768261006 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 482.11 USDC (shortened; full value 482.11262720541 USDC)
10%0.11935 USDC1,626.89 USDC (shortened; full value 1626.8964480522005122043429585436 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 482.11 USDC (shortened; full value 482.11262720541 USDC)
100%1.09585 USDC4,962.33 USDC (shortened; full value 4962.3351859844632272400779210907 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 482.11 USDC (shortened; full value 482.11262720541 USDC)

Reachability on the all-venues ladder is unconditionally true whenever an active pool exists, because a constant product curve has no upper price bound. The order-book-only column is the one that answers whether a target is attainable, and it is the one Keel itself uses.

How far the book actually goes

Furthest price the book reaches
not computed

Null by structure, not by failure: an active pool means every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning

Cost to walk it that far
not computed

Null for the same reason as the price above

Against genuine volume

Not reported for this asset. Without it there is no comparison between the cost of an attack and the genuine trading it would have to hide inside.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → manipulationCostCombined[], manipulationCostOrderbookOnly[], oracleResistance
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Which checks fired, and which could not run?

An unevaluated check is not a check that came back clear. The two never share a treatment.

Triggered(2)

  • THIN_DEPTH_5PCT
  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH

Could not be evaluated(3)

  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_30D
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_7D
  • WASH_TRADE_SUSPECTED
Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → flags[], unevaluatedFlags[], bandConfidence
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Who holds it, and is it genuinely traded?

Concentration and wash trading bound how much of the depth above is real.
Largest holder
31.8017 % (shortened; full value 31.80174502969865272869722538 %)
Top ten holders
87.8636 % (shortened; full value 87.86367523228229610340238719 %)
Concentration index
1,475.82 (shortened; full value 1475.8231879086089167099494775217087425712869755183515622)

Herfindahl–Hirschman, over the holder distribution

Volume excluded as not genuine
not computed

Of 30 day volume. A high share indicates suspected wash trading

Volume to supply, 30 day
not computed
Last genuine trade
not computed

No genuine trade was found in the window

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → holderTop1Pct, holderTop10Pct, holderHhi, volumeToSupply, lastGenuineTrade, tradesExcludedPct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

How has this moved over time?

A single reading cannot separate a thin asset from one that just got thin. This is a stored series, not the historical replay that health reports as unavailable — those are different endpoints.

2 readings from horizon, with no gaps reported. One source per chart.

Band at each reading

Medium
2 of 2

Which checks were firing

Whether a finding has been there all along or started recently. Only checks that fired at least once appear.

THIN_DEPTH_5PCTthroughout
HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGHthroughout

Price

Lowest
0.01085 USDC
Highest
0.01085 USDC
2026-09-17T23:45:53Z2026-09-18T12:45:48Z
Mid price
0.01085 USDC

Buy-side depth

What an order can absorb before the price moves against a buyer. The rungs are nested, so one scale covers all three, and the lines darken as the rung widens.

Lowest
22.17 USDC (shortened; full value 22.1705095663321994871782893512 USDC)
Highest
193.25 USDC (shortened; full value 193.2577335684416695532193163378 USDC)
2026-09-17T23:45:53Z2026-09-18T12:45:48ZOne scale across every line on this chart
2% from mid
22.17 USDC (shortened; full value 22.1705095663321994871782893512 USDC)
5% from mid
78.24 USDC (shortened; full value 78.2444123029869479294422880379 USDC)
10% from mid
191.77 USDC (shortened; full value 191.7767055748293922533979473979 USDC)

Cost to move the price by half

The series carries one manipulation rung, at the half per cent delta the engine treats as critical. A reading the engine could not produce breaks the line rather than sitting at zero.

No point in this range carried a value.

Collateral ceiling

Lowest
75.82 USDC (shortened; full value 75.821819491644279692970327572853003936432398319781 USDC)
Highest
75.82 USDC (shortened; full value 75.82890859788301620737402163505177042152374689935 USDC)
2026-09-17T23:45:53Z2026-09-18T12:45:48Z
Max safe collateral
75.82 USDC (shortened; full value 75.821819491644279692970327572853003936432398319781 USDC)
Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/history → points[], gaps[], dataSource
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What was this computed from?

Ledger
64,490,134

Closed at 2026-09-18T13:00:48Z

Computed at
2026-09-18T13:00:57.617484Z
Data source
horizon
Methodology
1.0.8-draft

The version that produced these figures, not the one this page was built against