LIBRE against USDC — what depth stands behind this price?
Risk band
Critical
partial confidence
A floor: the real band can only be worse.
- Max safe collateral
- 0.09 USDC (shortened; full value 0.09202875 USDC)Limited by manipulation cost
- Depth within 5%
- buy6.41 USDC (shortened; full value 6.4136905344662030088895045348 USDC)sell6.53 USDC (shortened; full value 6.536741958503379230172354585869671956013381500551 USDC)
- Cost to move +50%
- 0.36 USDC (shortened; full value 0.368115 USDC)Reachable through the order book
- Checks
- 5 triggered3 not evaluated
History
Every stored reading from this source, whenever it was taken
A reconstruction is written where a replay ran rather than on the scan's cadence, so there is no window to choose: the engine returns the readings it holds and the axis below is labelled from them.
No readings were stored in this range from this source
The engine holds no stored reading for Offers implied on this asset. A reconstruction exists only where keel replay has been run, and it has been run on one pair.
Checks
Triggered5
- Cheap to move the price
- Cheap next to real trading
- Price sources disagree
- Extreme spread
- Thin depth at 5%
Not evaluated3
- No genuine trade in 30 days
- No genuine trade in 7 days
- Volume may be wash traded
Evidence
The figures behind the verdict, as the engine served them.
Concentration and wash trading bound how much of the depth is real.
- Largest holder
- 19.0971 % (shortened; full value 19.09710999477763638762096255 %)
- Top ten holders
- 57.9585 % (shortened; full value 57.95859958047089708954210158 %)
- Concentration index
- 594.65 (shortened; full value 594.6594102380793981551371545059416205214904195361591286)
Herfindahl–Hirschman, over the holder distribution
- Volume excluded as not genuine
- not computed
the newest trade reading is anchored more than 48h0m0s ago, so it was not used
- Volume to supply, 30 day
- not computed
the newest trade reading is anchored more than 48h0m0s ago, so it was not used
- Last genuine trade
- not computed
the newest trade reading is anchored more than 48h0m0s ago, so it was not used