Skip to content
Keel
Ledger
64,490,132
Methodology
1.0.8-draft
Age
6s

What depth stands behind this price?

FRED against USDC · GCA73U…GYZLV6

How much can this asset safely back?

The ceiling is the lower of two independent limits. Which one binds is the part a lender acts on, so both are shown.
  1. Low
  2. Medium
  3. High
  4. Critical — this asset

Criticalpartial confidence

A band marked partial is a floor. At least one high-severity check could not be evaluated, so the real band can only be worse than the one shown, never better.

0.0010 USDC (shortened; full value 0.001096475000604051582 USDC)

Limited by manipulation cost

Liquidation term
26.43 USDC (shortened; full value 26.431852508708587461102513965913831883782863446149 USDC)

Sell-side depth at the liquidation delta, times the haircut.

Manipulation termbinds
0.0010 USDC (shortened; full value 0.001096475000604051582 USDC)

Order-book-only manipulation cost at the critical delta, times the safety margin.

These bands come from thresholds that were chosen, not calibrated

The thresholds were chosen based on the magnitude of the Blend incident of February 2026 and on conservative judgement, not calibrated against a set of incidents. Every flag is reported separately so that consumers can apply their own thresholds.

Every threshold, as the engine serves it

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → maxSafeCollateral, maxSafeCollateralLiquidation, maxSafeCollateralManipulation
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What this computation could not do

  • maxReachablePrice and costToMaxReachablePrice are null because an active pool is present: under a constant product curve the price tends to infinity as the base reserve tends to zero, so every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning

Served by the engine with this response and shown as written.

Where does the price come from?

Two venues can disagree. Both readings are shown, not only the one that won.
Mid price
0.00009819 USDC (shortened; full value 0.000098196725849 USDC)

Source: order book mid

Spread
64.1502 % (shortened; full value 64.15025669477706172109380021 %)

Undefined unless the price came from a two-sided book

Pool spot price
0.00010106 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0001010650041505 USDC)

Reported whenever an active pool exists, whichever source won

Divergence between the two
2.8380 % (shortened; full value 2.83805292010746900602532915 %)

Null means there is no pool to diverge from, not that the sources agree

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → midPrice, priceSource, spreadPct, poolSpotPrice, priceDivergencePct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What volume can it absorb before the price moves?

Three rungs at 2, 5 and 10 per cent, in each direction. The buy side matters for oracle manipulation and the sell side for liquidation.
  • SDEX
  • AMM
  • Sell side, composition not reported

2% from mid

Buy side
0 USDC
Sell side
19.71 USDC (shortened; full value 19.718682455886845458262458135393553333751973279722 USDC)

5% from mid

Buy side
8.23 USDC (shortened; full value 8.238337633932350298961481723 USDC)
Sell side
31.98 USDC (shortened; full value 31.983599261430759731331509437058237646020754766434 USDC)

10% from mid

Buy side
27.72 USDC (shortened; full value 27.7232614662235996839523688818 USDC)
Sell side
52.86 USDC (shortened; full value 52.863705017417174922205027931827663767565726892298 USDC)

Bars share one scale. The venue split decomposes the buy side; the sell side is drawn as an outline because its composition is not reported.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → depth[]
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What would it cost to move the price?

Read cost together with reachability: a figure on an unreachable rung says how far the book goes, not what the move costs.
Cost to move the price by each delta, through all venues and through the order book alone, with whether the target is reachable at all.
MoveTarget priceCost, all venuesCost, order book only
0.5%0.000147 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0001472950887735 USDC)169.89 USDC (shortened; full value 169.8912239464625665946861747672 USDC)0.0043 USDC (shortened; full value 0.004385900002416206328 USDC)
1%0.000196 USDC (shortened; full value 0.000196393451698 USDC)322.98 USDC (shortened; full value 322.9897552574991139823290823086 USDC)0.0043 USDC (shortened; full value 0.004385900002416206328 USDC)
10%0.001080 USDC (shortened; full value 0.001080163984339 USDC)1,863.41 USDC (shortened; full value 1863.4137294220794128215750764996 USDC)3.20 USDC (shortened; full value 3.20147870007350763384427 USDC)
100%0.009917 USDC (shortened; full value 0.009917869310749 USDC)7,697.64 USDC (shortened; full value 7697.6459012952264544884275312901 USDC)396.68 USDC (shortened; full value 396.68875600045750763384427 USDC)

Reachability on the all-venues ladder is unconditionally true whenever an active pool exists, because a constant product curve has no upper price bound. The order-book-only column is the one that answers whether a target is attainable, and it is the one Keel itself uses.

How far the book actually goes

Furthest price the book reaches
not computed

Null by structure, not by failure: an active pool means every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning

Cost to walk it that far
not computed

Null for the same reason as the price above

Against genuine volume

Not reported for this asset. Without it there is no comparison between the cost of an attack and the genuine trading it would have to hide inside.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → manipulationCostCombined[], manipulationCostOrderbookOnly[], oracleResistance
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Which checks fired, and which could not run?

An unevaluated check is not a check that came back clear. The two never share a treatment.

Triggered(4)

  • ZERO_DEPTH_2PCT
  • MANIPULATION_CHEAP
  • SPREAD_EXTREME
  • THIN_DEPTH_5PCT

Could not be evaluated(6)

  • MANIPULATION_RATIO_LOW
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_30D
  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREME
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_7D
  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH
  • WASH_TRADE_SUSPECTED
Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → flags[], unevaluatedFlags[], bandConfidence
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Who holds it, and is it genuinely traded?

Concentration and wash trading bound how much of the depth above is real.
Largest holder
not computed
Top ten holders
not computed
Concentration index
not computed

Herfindahl–Hirschman, over the holder distribution

Volume excluded as not genuine
not computed

Of 30 day volume. A high share indicates suspected wash trading

Volume to supply, 30 day
not computed
Last genuine trade
not computed

No genuine trade was found in the window

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → holderTop1Pct, holderTop10Pct, holderHhi, volumeToSupply, lastGenuineTrade, tradesExcludedPct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

How has this moved over time?

A single reading cannot separate a thin asset from one that just got thin. This is a stored series, not the historical replay that health reports as unavailable — those are different endpoints.

No readings were stored in this range from this source

The engine accepted the request and returned nothing for Hubble. The series is as old as the deployment, and the reconstruction sources are not populated in production, so a window can reach back further than anything that was recorded. It is not empty because the figures were zero.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/history → points[], gaps[], dataSource
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What was this computed from?

Ledger
64,490,132

Closed at 2026-09-18T13:00:38Z

Computed at
2026-09-18T13:00:44.354403Z
Data source
horizon
Methodology
1.0.8-draft

The version that produced these figures, not the one this page was built against