Skip to content
Keel
Ledger
64,490,132
Methodology
1.0.8-draft
Age
5s

What depth stands behind this price?

EURC against USDC · GDHU6W…ITNPP2

How much can this asset safely back?

The ceiling is the lower of two independent limits. Which one binds is the part a lender acts on, so both are shown.
  1. Low
  2. Medium — this asset
  3. High
  4. Critical

Mediumpartial confidence

A band marked partial is a floor. At least one high-severity check could not be evaluated, so the real band can only be worse than the one shown, never better.

12,465.03 USDC (shortened; full value 12465.0362362278144558755586025 USDC)

Limited by manipulation cost

Liquidation term
24,851.95 USDC (shortened; full value 24851.959623604980650079193062431337704256916540177584 USDC)

Sell-side depth at the liquidation delta, times the haircut.

Manipulation termbinds
12,465.03 USDC (shortened; full value 12465.0362362278144558755586025 USDC)

Order-book-only manipulation cost at the critical delta, times the safety margin.

These bands come from thresholds that were chosen, not calibrated

The thresholds were chosen based on the magnitude of the Blend incident of February 2026 and on conservative judgement, not calibrated against a set of incidents. Every flag is reported separately so that consumers can apply their own thresholds.

Every threshold, as the engine serves it

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → maxSafeCollateral, maxSafeCollateralLiquidation, maxSafeCollateralManipulation
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What this computation could not do

  • maxReachablePrice and costToMaxReachablePrice are null because an active pool is present: under a constant product curve the price tends to infinity as the base reserve tends to zero, so every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning

Served by the engine with this response and shown as written.

Where does the price come from?

Two venues can disagree. Both readings are shown, not only the one that won.
Mid price
1.14275259 USDC (shortened; full value 1.1427525965125878 USDC)

Source: order book mid

Spread
0.2579 % (shortened; full value 0.25791820415189349974911809 %)

Undefined unless the price came from a two-sided book

Pool spot price
1.14361755 USDC (shortened; full value 1.1436175531907974 USDC)

Reported whenever an active pool exists, whichever source won

Divergence between the two
0.0756 % (shortened; full value 0.07563338598610102533172249 %)

Null means there is no pool to diverge from, not that the sources agree

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → midPrice, priceSource, spreadPct, poolSpotPrice, priceDivergencePct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What volume can it absorb before the price moves?

Three rungs at 2, 5 and 10 per cent, in each direction. The buy side matters for oracle manipulation and the sell side for liquidation.
  • SDEX
  • AMM
  • Sell side, composition not reported

2% from mid

Buy side
42,669.09 USDC (shortened; full value 42669.093617462346665566142381001 USDC)
Sell side
48,512.90 USDC (shortened; full value 48512.909504919145642679118192030194408716295676628128 USDC)

5% from mid

Buy side
48,696.85 USDC (shortened; full value 48696.8545840985327368012178410384 USDC)
Sell side
49,087.00 USDC (shortened; full value 49087.005950040832621578199715479381394241557970918848 USDC)

10% from mid

Buy side
49,777.27 USDC (shortened; full value 49777.2707404082183476140865927682 USDC)
Sell side
49,703.91 USDC (shortened; full value 49703.919247209961300158386124862675408513833080355168 USDC)

Bars share one scale. The venue split decomposes the buy side; the sell side is drawn as an outline because its composition is not reported.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → depth[]
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What would it cost to move the price?

Read cost together with reachability: a figure on an unreachable rung says how far the book goes, not what the move costs.
Cost to move the price by each delta, through all venues and through the order book alone, with whether the target is reachable at all.
MoveTarget priceCost, all venuesCost, order book only
0.5%1.714128 USDC (shortened; full value 1.7141288947688817 USDC)50,404.42 USDC (shortened; full value 50404.4243352658055038053009526706 USDC)49,860.14 USDC (shortened; full value 49860.14494491125782350223441 USDC)
1%2.285505 USDC (shortened; full value 2.2855051930251756 USDC)51,056.54 USDC (shortened; full value 51056.5469094993541951884119135314 USDC)50,052.64 USDC (shortened; full value 50052.64494491125782350223441 USDC)
10%12.570278 USDC (shortened; full value 12.5702785616384658 USDC)56,960.01 USDC (shortened; full value 56960.0106870312449549785729246856 USDC)51,341.14 USDC (shortened; full value 51341.14494491125782350223441 USDC)
100%115.418012 USDC (shortened; full value 115.4180122477713678 USDC)77,199.73 USDC (shortened; full value 77199.7331131621212716541186602387 USDC)55,247.01 USDC (shortened; full value 55247.01261242825142350223441 USDC)

Reachability on the all-venues ladder is unconditionally true whenever an active pool exists, because a constant product curve has no upper price bound. The order-book-only column is the one that answers whether a target is attainable, and it is the one Keel itself uses.

How far the book actually goes

Furthest price the book reaches
not computed

Null by structure, not by failure: an active pool means every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning

Cost to walk it that far
not computed

Null for the same reason as the price above

Against genuine volume

Not reported for this asset. Without it there is no comparison between the cost of an attack and the genuine trading it would have to hide inside.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → manipulationCostCombined[], manipulationCostOrderbookOnly[], oracleResistance
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Which checks fired, and which could not run?

An unevaluated check is not a check that came back clear. The two never share a treatment.

Triggered(1)

  • THIN_DEPTH_5PCT

Could not be evaluated(6)

  • MANIPULATION_RATIO_LOW
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_30D
  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREME
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_7D
  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH
  • WASH_TRADE_SUSPECTED
Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → flags[], unevaluatedFlags[], bandConfidence
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Who holds it, and is it genuinely traded?

Concentration and wash trading bound how much of the depth above is real.
Largest holder
not computed
Top ten holders
not computed
Concentration index
not computed

Herfindahl–Hirschman, over the holder distribution

Volume excluded as not genuine
not computed

Of 30 day volume. A high share indicates suspected wash trading

Volume to supply, 30 day
not computed
Last genuine trade
not computed

No genuine trade was found in the window

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → holderTop1Pct, holderTop10Pct, holderHhi, volumeToSupply, lastGenuineTrade, tradesExcludedPct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

How has this moved over time?

A single reading cannot separate a thin asset from one that just got thin. This is a stored series, not the historical replay that health reports as unavailable — those are different endpoints.

No readings were stored in this range from this source

The engine accepted the request and returned nothing for Offers implied. The series is as old as the deployment, and the reconstruction sources are not populated in production, so a window can reach back further than anything that was recorded. It is not empty because the figures were zero.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/history → points[], gaps[], dataSource
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What was this computed from?

Ledger
64,490,132

Closed at 2026-09-18T13:00:38Z

Computed at
2026-09-18T13:00:43.586338Z
Data source
horizon
Methodology
1.0.8-draft

The version that produced these figures, not the one this page was built against