Skip to content
Keel
Ledger
64,489,771
Methodology
1.0.8-draft
Age
5s

What depth stands behind this price?

BTC against USDC · GDPJAL…5O2MZM

How much can this asset safely back?

The ceiling is the lower of two independent limits. Which one binds is the part a lender acts on, so both are shown.
  1. Low
  2. Medium — this asset
  3. High
  4. Critical

Mediumpartial confidence

A band marked partial is a floor. At least one high-severity check could not be evaluated, so the real band can only be worse than the one shown, never better.

1,433.70 USDC (shortened; full value 1433.709894661715593827550596571519481805030212780468 USDC)

Limited by liquidation depth

Liquidation termbinds
1,433.70 USDC (shortened; full value 1433.709894661715593827550596571519481805030212780468 USDC)

Sell-side depth at the liquidation delta, times the haircut.

Manipulation term
3,386.84 USDC (shortened; full value 3386.84241658772621368144551 USDC)

Order-book-only manipulation cost at the critical delta, times the safety margin.

These bands come from thresholds that were chosen, not calibrated

The thresholds were chosen based on the magnitude of the Blend incident of February 2026 and on conservative judgement, not calibrated against a set of incidents. Every flag is reported separately so that consumers can apply their own thresholds.

Every threshold, as the engine serves it

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → maxSafeCollateral, maxSafeCollateralLiquidation, maxSafeCollateralManipulation
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What this computation could not do

  • maxReachablePrice and costToMaxReachablePrice are null because an active pool is present: under a constant product curve the price tends to infinity as the base reserve tends to zero, so every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning

Served by the engine with this response and shown as written.

Where does the price come from?

Two venues can disagree. Both readings are shown, not only the one that won.
Mid price
77,810.18414995 USDC (shortened; full value 77810.18414995031120875 USDC)

Source: order book mid

Spread
0.4958 % (shortened; full value 0.49588868618667678425499738 %)

Undefined unless the price came from a two-sided book

Pool spot price
77,825.97084389 USDC (shortened; full value 77825.9708438988851486 USDC)

Reported whenever an active pool exists, whichever source won

Divergence between the two
0.0202 % (shortened; full value 0.02028460908022392777788518 %)

Null means there is no pool to diverge from, not that the sources agree

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → midPrice, priceSource, spreadPct, poolSpotPrice, priceDivergencePct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What volume can it absorb before the price moves?

Three rungs at 2, 5 and 10 per cent, in each direction. The buy side matters for oracle manipulation and the sell side for liquidation.
  • SDEX
  • AMM
  • Sell side, composition not reported

2% from mid

Buy side
991.22 USDC (shortened; full value 991.2298711463863094563504709017 USDC)
Sell side
539.91 USDC (shortened; full value 539.917168598068700071748136837750330758379396314844 USDC)

5% from mid

Buy side
1,778.84 USDC (shortened; full value 1778.8448943561210899383975318191 USDC)
Sell side
1,350.71 USDC (shortened; full value 1350.71492969670706462036035264597574931629320811664 USDC)

10% from mid

Buy side
3,215.70 USDC (shortened; full value 3215.7098365878288056190586705078 USDC)
Sell side
2,867.41 USDC (shortened; full value 2867.419789323431187655101193143038963610060425560936 USDC)

Bars share one scale. The venue split decomposes the buy side; the sell side is drawn as an outline because its composition is not reported.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → depth[]
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What would it cost to move the price?

Read cost together with reachability: a figure on an unreachable rung says how far the book goes, not what the move costs.
Cost to move the price by each delta, through all venues and through the order book alone, with whether the target is reachable at all.
MoveTarget priceCost, all venuesCost, order book only
0.5%116,715.276224 USDC (shortened; full value 116715.276224925466813125 USDC)25,547.20 USDC (shortened; full value 25547.2034704752517229956481874559 USDC)13,547.36 USDC (shortened; full value 13547.36966635090485472578204 USDC)
1%155,620.368299 USDC (shortened; full value 155620.3682999006224175 USDC)84,819.21 USDC (shortened; full value 84819.2187562735945374314468711923 USDC)62,698.48 USDC (shortened; full value 62698.48903556473103989368117 USDC)
10%855,912.025649 USDC (shortened; full value 855912.02564945342329625 USDC)282,892.34 USDC (shortened; full value 282892.3497356711032059690310408144 USDC)159,150.04 USDC (shortened; full value 159150.04903556473103989368117 USDC)
100%7,858,828.599144 USDC (shortened; full value 7858828.59914498143208375 USDC)643,343.11 USDC (shortened; full value 643343.1199114508831877522275777158 USDC)159,929.09 USDC (shortened; full value 159929.09463556473103989368117 USDC)

Reachability on the all-venues ladder is unconditionally true whenever an active pool exists, because a constant product curve has no upper price bound. The order-book-only column is the one that answers whether a target is attainable, and it is the one Keel itself uses.

How far the book actually goes

Furthest price the book reaches
not computed

Null by structure, not by failure: an active pool means every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning

Cost to walk it that far
not computed

Null for the same reason as the price above

Against genuine volume

Not reported for this asset. Without it there is no comparison between the cost of an attack and the genuine trading it would have to hide inside.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → manipulationCostCombined[], manipulationCostOrderbookOnly[], oracleResistance
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Which checks fired, and which could not run?

An unevaluated check is not a check that came back clear. The two never share a treatment.

Triggered(1)

  • THIN_DEPTH_5PCT

Could not be evaluated(6)

  • MANIPULATION_RATIO_LOW
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_30D
  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREME
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_7D
  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH
  • WASH_TRADE_SUSPECTED
Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → flags[], unevaluatedFlags[], bandConfidence
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Who holds it, and is it genuinely traded?

Concentration and wash trading bound how much of the depth above is real.
Largest holder
not computed
Top ten holders
not computed
Concentration index
not computed

Herfindahl–Hirschman, over the holder distribution

Volume excluded as not genuine
not computed

Of 30 day volume. A high share indicates suspected wash trading

Volume to supply, 30 day
not computed
Last genuine trade
not computed

No genuine trade was found in the window

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → holderTop1Pct, holderTop10Pct, holderHhi, volumeToSupply, lastGenuineTrade, tradesExcludedPct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

How has this moved over time?

A single reading cannot separate a thin asset from one that just got thin. This is a stored series, not the historical replay that health reports as unavailable — those are different endpoints.

No readings were stored in this range from this source

The engine accepted the request and returned nothing for Hubble. The series is as old as the deployment, and the reconstruction sources are not populated in production, so a window can reach back further than anything that was recorded. It is not empty because the figures were zero.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/history → points[], gaps[], dataSource
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What was this computed from?

Ledger
64,489,771

Closed at 2026-09-18T12:30:33Z

Computed at
2026-09-18T12:30:38.194221Z
Data source
horizon
Methodology
1.0.8-draft

The version that produced these figures, not the one this page was built against