Skip to content
Keel
Ledger
64,490,308
Methodology
1.0.8-draft
Age
18s

What depth stands behind this price?

BASH against USDC · GBQ42A…N7D65N

How much can this asset safely back?

The ceiling is the lower of two independent limits. Which one binds is the part a lender acts on, so both are shown.
  1. Low
  2. Medium — this asset
  3. High
  4. Critical

Mediumpartial confidence

A band marked partial is a floor. At least one high-severity check could not be evaluated, so the real band can only be worse than the one shown, never better.

64.61 USDC (shortened; full value 64.613286495539172725279033747932534255731654172788 USDC)

Limited by liquidation depth

Liquidation termbinds
64.61 USDC (shortened; full value 64.613286495539172725279033747932534255731654172788 USDC)

Sell-side depth at the liquidation delta, times the haircut.

Manipulation term
not applicable

Not applied: the critical target is not reachable through the order book.

These bands come from thresholds that were chosen, not calibrated

The thresholds were chosen based on the magnitude of the Blend incident of February 2026 and on conservative judgement, not calibrated against a set of incidents. Every flag is reported separately so that consumers can apply their own thresholds.

Every threshold, as the engine serves it

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → maxSafeCollateral, maxSafeCollateralLiquidation, maxSafeCollateralManipulation
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What this computation could not do

  • maxReachablePrice and costToMaxReachablePrice are null because an active pool is present: under a constant product curve the price tends to infinity as the base reserve tends to zero, so every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning
  • manipulation to delta 0.5 is unreachable through the order book; the manipulation term was not applied

Served by the engine with this response and shown as written.

Where does the price come from?

Two venues can disagree. Both readings are shown, not only the one that won.
Mid price
0.00000949 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0000094927064033 USDC)

Source: AMM pool spot

Spread
not computed

Undefined unless the price came from a two-sided book

Pool spot price
0.00000949 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0000094927064033 USDC)

Reported whenever an active pool exists, whichever source won

Divergence between the two
not computed

Null means there is no pool to diverge from, not that the sources agree

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → midPrice, priceSource, spreadPct, poolSpotPrice, priceDivergencePct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What volume can it absorb before the price moves?

Three rungs at 2, 5 and 10 per cent, in each direction. The buy side matters for oracle manipulation and the sell side for liquidation.
  • SDEX
  • AMM
  • Sell side, composition not reported

2% from mid

Buy side
25.20 USDC (shortened; full value 25.2085234636045820028880168992 USDC)
Sell side
25.30 USDC (shortened; full value 25.309352348306210616977808500961854594906721669 USDC)

5% from mid

Buy side
62.56 USDC (shortened; full value 62.5623640446387375400919926487 USDC)
Sell side
63.76 USDC (shortened; full value 63.762669538870967123461943712618485076758637510414 USDC)

10% from mid

Buy side
123.65 USDC (shortened; full value 123.652053313335123177294369212 USDC)
Sell side
129.22 USDC (shortened; full value 129.226572991078345450558067495865068511463308345576 USDC)

Bars share one scale. The venue split decomposes the buy side; the sell side is drawn as an outline because its composition is not reported.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → depth[]
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What would it cost to move the price?

Read cost together with reachability: a figure on an unreachable rung says how far the book goes, not what the move costs.
Cost to move the price by each delta, through all venues and through the order book alone, with whether the target is reachable at all.
MoveTarget priceCost, all venuesCost, order book only
0.5%0.000014 USDC (shortened; full value 0.00001423905960495 USDC)569.36 USDC (shortened; full value 569.3673557370720658930031816627 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 0 USDC
1%0.000018 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0000189854128066 USDC)1,049.36 USDC (shortened; full value 1049.3662402995687009201011711148 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 0 USDC
10%0.000104 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0001044197704363 USDC)5,868.92 USDC (shortened; full value 5868.9238288396652256259161515984 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 0 USDC
100%0.000958 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0009587633467333 USDC)22,926.90 USDC (shortened; full value 22926.9024927784447753198387050061 USDC)unreachablebook ends at 0 USDC

Reachability on the all-venues ladder is unconditionally true whenever an active pool exists, because a constant product curve has no upper price bound. The order-book-only column is the one that answers whether a target is attainable, and it is the one Keel itself uses.

How far the book actually goes

Furthest price the book reaches
not computed

Null by structure, not by failure: an active pool means every target is reachable and a highest price has no meaning

Cost to walk it that far
not computed

Null for the same reason as the price above

Against genuine volume

Not reported for this asset. Without it there is no comparison between the cost of an attack and the genuine trading it would have to hide inside.

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → manipulationCostCombined[], manipulationCostOrderbookOnly[], oracleResistance
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Which checks fired, and which could not run?

An unevaluated check is not a check that came back clear. The two never share a treatment.

Triggered(2)

  • THIN_DEPTH_5PCT
  • HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH

Could not be evaluated(5)

  • PRICE_SOURCE_CONFLICT
  • SPREAD_EXTREME
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_30D
  • NO_GENUINE_TRADE_7D
  • WASH_TRADE_SUSPECTED
Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → flags[], unevaluatedFlags[], bandConfidence
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

Who holds it, and is it genuinely traded?

Concentration and wash trading bound how much of the depth above is real.
Largest holder
30.1183 % (shortened; full value 30.11834646311862388983161962 %)
Top ten holders
97.6434 % (shortened; full value 97.64340900702199573122929476 %)
Concentration index
1,552.37 (shortened; full value 1552.3723827961565965822596740122250735918512894177049188)

Herfindahl–Hirschman, over the holder distribution

Volume excluded as not genuine
not computed

Of 30 day volume. A high share indicates suspected wash trading

Volume to supply, 30 day
not computed
Last genuine trade
not computed

No genuine trade was found in the window

Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/depth → holderTop1Pct, holderTop10Pct, holderHhi, volumeToSupply, lastGenuineTrade, tradesExcludedPct
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

How has this moved over time?

A single reading cannot separate a thin asset from one that just got thin. This is a stored series, not the historical replay that health reports as unavailable — those are different endpoints.

2 readings from horizon, with no gaps reported. One source per chart.

Band at each reading

Medium
2 of 2

Which checks were firing

Whether a finding has been there all along or started recently. Only checks that fired at least once appear.

THIN_DEPTH_5PCTthroughout
HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGHthroughout

Price

Lowest
0.00000941 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0000094132739985 USDC)
Highest
0.00000949 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0000094927064033 USDC)
2026-09-17T23:45:28Z2026-09-18T13:00:28Z
Mid price
0.00000949 USDC (shortened; full value 0.0000094927064033 USDC)

Buy-side depth

What an order can absorb before the price moves against a buyer. The rungs are nested, so one scale covers all three, and the lines darken as the rung widens.

Lowest
25.10 USDC (shortened; full value 25.1025209525718117754969360476 USDC)
Highest
123.65 USDC (shortened; full value 123.652053313335123177294369212 USDC)
2026-09-17T23:45:28Z2026-09-18T13:00:28ZOne scale across every line on this chart
2% from mid
25.20 USDC (shortened; full value 25.2085234636045820028880168992 USDC)
5% from mid
62.56 USDC (shortened; full value 62.5623640446387375400919926487 USDC)
10% from mid
123.65 USDC (shortened; full value 123.652053313335123177294369212 USDC)

Cost to move the price by half

The series carries one manipulation rung, at the half per cent delta the engine treats as critical. A reading the engine could not produce breaks the line rather than sitting at zero.

No point in this range carried a value.

Collateral ceiling

Lowest
64.34 USDC (shortened; full value 64.341585908850880921069750999964997498457620707208 USDC)
Highest
64.61 USDC (shortened; full value 64.613286495539172725279033747932534255731654172788 USDC)
2026-09-17T23:45:28Z2026-09-18T13:00:28Z
Max safe collateral
64.61 USDC (shortened; full value 64.613286495539172725279033747932534255731654172788 USDC)
Where this number comes from
Source
GET /asset/{assetId}/history → points[], gaps[], dataSource
What it is
Awaiting methodology copy.
What it does not account for
Awaiting methodology copy.

What was this computed from?

Ledger
64,490,308

Closed at 2026-09-18T13:15:18Z

Computed at
2026-09-18T13:15:36.56148Z
Data source
horizon
Methodology
1.0.8-draft

The version that produced these figures, not the one this page was built against