Skip to content
keel
Ledger
65,276,593
Methodology
1.0.8-draft
Age
6s

AMM against USDC — what depth stands behind this price?

All assets

AMM / USDC

GARQ…BDOQ

Risk band

Critical

partial confidence

A floor: the real band can only be worse.

Max safe collateral
0 USDCLimited by manipulation cost
Depth within 5%
buy15.40 USDC (shortened; full value 15.4058588987478700333155968552 USDC)sell57.90 USDC (shortened; full value 57.909256151344240565227033494748820180094191997427 USDC)
Cost to move +50%
0 USDCReachable at no cost: nothing stands in the way
Checks
7 triggered3 not evaluated

No readings were stored in this range from this source

The engine accepted the request and returned nothing for Hubble. The series is as old as the deployment, so a window can reach back further than anything that was recorded. It is not empty because the figures were zero.

Checks

What fires now, how long it has been firing across the window above, and what could not run.

Triggered7

  • Nothing tradable within 2%
  • Cheap to move the price
  • Cheap next to real trading
  • Extreme spread
  • One holder owns most of it
  • Thin depth at 5%
  • Supply is concentrated

Not evaluated3

  • No genuine trade in 30 days
  • No genuine trade in 7 days
  • Volume may be wash traded

Evidence

The figures behind the verdict, as the engine served them.

Concentration and wash trading bound how much of the depth is real.

Largest holder
99.8251 % (shortened; full value 99.82519356884194479406613317 %)
Top ten holders
99.9101 % (shortened; full value 99.91014042539254026871571561 %)
Concentration index
9,965.07 (shortened; full value 9965.070507175192488673014293719733913119080044064911459)

Herfindahl–Hirschman, over the holder distribution

Volume excluded as not genuine
not computed

the newest trade reading is anchored more than 48h0m0s ago, so it was not used

Volume to supply, 30 day
not computed

the newest trade reading is anchored more than 48h0m0s ago, so it was not used

Last genuine trade
not computed

the newest trade reading is anchored more than 48h0m0s ago, so it was not used